Assessment of Automatic Tourniquets for Soldiers During Wartime

March 13, 2024 updated by: TOMER ERLICH, Medical Corps, Israel Defense Force

Assessment of Automatic Tourniquets for Soldiers During Wartime as Part of Accelerated Research and Development

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare usability and performance of automatic tourniquets (AUT) and standard mechanical tourniquets (CAT) in healthy adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Are AUTs effective in occlusion of blood flow
  • Are AUTs easy to use

Participants will be asked to place AUT and CAT on their upper limbs and lower limbs (8 applications overall).

Following each application, the following parameters will be assessed:

  1. Limb blood flow
  2. Ease of use

Researchers will compare the results of the AUT and CAT to see if AUT is as effective as CAT in blood occlusion, and if AUT is easy to use as the CAT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare usability and performance of automatic tourniquets (AUT) and standard mechanical tourniquets (CAT) in healthy adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Are AUTs effective in occlusion of blood flow
  • Are AUTs easy to use

Participants will be asked to place AUT and CAT on their upper limbs and lower limbs (8 applications overall).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-Soldier in active service or active reserve service.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Muscle disorders
  • Peripheral nerve disorders
  • Skin diseases of the limbs
  • Limb surgery in the past
  • Rickets
  • Hypertension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Automatic Tourniquet
Automatic pneumatic tourniquet
Tourniquets will be applied until peripheral blood flow occlusion is achieved. Total intervention time: up to 60 seconds
Active Comparator: Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT)
Combat Application Tourniquet Generation 7
Tourniquets will be applied until peripheral blood flow occlusion is achieved. Total intervention time: up to 60 seconds

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to distal limb arterial occlusion as assessed by Doppler
Time Frame: 60 seconds
Time to distal limb arterial occlusion as assessed by Doppler is recorded
60 seconds

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of using automatic tourniquets
Time Frame: Will be assessed via questionnaire up to 5 minutes following the intervention.
Safety issues, specifically peripheral limb numbness will be assessed via questionnaire. Scale is from 0 to 5, 0 is "No numbness", 5 is "Severe numbness"
Will be assessed via questionnaire up to 5 minutes following the intervention.
Usability of using automatic tourniquets
Time Frame: Ease of use will be assessed via questionnaire up to 5 minutes following the intervention.
Usability of using automatic tourniquets will be assessed via questionnaire up to 5 minutes following the intervention. Scale for ease to secure the tourniquet is from 0 to 5, 0 is "Very difficult to secure", 5 is "Very easy to secure"
Ease of use will be assessed via questionnaire up to 5 minutes following the intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tomer Erlich, MD, Head of Medical innovation and R&D

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1.1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma Injury

Clinical Trials on Occlusion of blood flow diagnosed by Point of Care UltraSound (POCUS)

Subscribe