Topical CBD Scar Healing Study

March 3, 2026 updated by: University of Oklahoma

The Effects of Topical Cannabidiol on Paramedian Forehead Flap Scar Healing: A Split Scar Study (TOPSCAR)

The purpose of this study is to find out what effects (good and bad) that cannabidiol (CBD) has on scar healing and appearance in patients who have undergone paramedian forehead flap reconstruction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The patient will be asked to apply a silicone patch to half of the scar and experimental ointment (CBD oil ointment) with silicone patch) to the other half of the scar on their forehead. They will be randomized to which half of the scar the ointment will be applied. Neither they nor their physician will choose which half of the scar will have the experimental ointment applied. Specific instructions will be given to the patient on how to apply each drug (the silicone patch to one segment of the scar and the CBD with silicone patch to the other segment of the scar). They will apply the treatments twice a day for 2 months and, at their follow-up appointments, complete two questionnaires about how the scar is healing. Photographs of the scars will be taken at each visit and will be evaluated to determine if there is an improved outcome in the appearance of the scar.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark Mims, M.D., Ph.D.,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients that are adults (18+) of all genders and ethnicities who have undergone a PMFF (Paramedian forehead flap) will be considered for this study.
  • English-speaking patients

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients younger than 18 years of age
  • Non-English speaking patients
  • Patients with known allergies to CBD
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners
  • Patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment
  • A history of suicidal ideation and behavior within the last 6 months
  • Patients with severe depression
  • Who anticipate coadministration of other CNS depressants including alcohol that could potentiate the sedating effects of the drug
  • Patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity reactions to adhesives
  • Patients who anticipate coadministration of potentially hepatotoxic drugs
  • Patients who anticipate coadministration of sensitive CYP2C19 substrates per labeling

Termination criteria

  • There will be immediate termination from the study if any allergic response to the CBD/silicone combination occurs or if the topical application of CBD/silicone significantly worsens the scar outcome at the Follow Up 2 visit or at any subsequent visit.
  • Subject will not receive any additional CBD doses if they experience an adverse event assessed as ≥ Grade 3 (including hepatotoxicities and hematologic adverse events, ≥ Grade 2 for the system-organ class of Cardiac Disorders) according to CTCAE v5. They will remain on study in follow-up until the adverse event resolves or stabilizes.
  • If the patient voluntarily requests cessation in the study.
  • Pregnancy
  • Increase in serum transaminases (ALT/AST) to above three times the upper limit of normal or increase in total bilirubin to above two times the upper limit of normal.
  • If a subject experiences worsening depression or suicidal ideation or behavior, the participant will be discontinued from treatment with CBD and immediately referred to a mental health professional. The decision to resume treatment with CBD will be made in collaboration with a mental health professional.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Split-scar randomized trial arm with CBD oil
The study targets the vertical forehead scar, treating half with CBD oil and a silicone patch (experimental).
Drug: Vantage Hemp CBD Isolate + Silicone patch
The study intervention is prospective in nature. This "split scar" study directly compares two parts of the healing scar during clinic visits. Photos will be taken at each visit to track progress. Assessments will be done over a period of around 7 months using the Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, followed by blinded photo evaluations using the Scar Cosmesis and Rating Scale.
Placebo Comparator: Split-scar randomized trial arm without CBD oil
The study targets the vertical forehead scar, treating the other scar half with a silicone patch (control).
Drug: Silicone patch
Standard of care silicone patch will be used as the control part of the split scar study. This "split scar" study directly compares two parts of the healing scar during clinic visits. Photos will be taken at each visit to track progress. Assessments will be done over a period of around 7 months using the Modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, followed by blinded photo evaluations using the Scar Cosmesis and Rating Scale.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of subjective and objective effects of CBD on the outcomes of healing scars.
Time Frame: 2 years
Proportion of patients who have a positive effect using CBD oil in combination with the silicone patch. This will be assessed using the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) scale to determine the impact of CBD oil and silicon patch combo. This photographic evaluation of scare will be done over a period of around 7 months to evaluate the scar outcomes, using the scoring system with minimum score of 0 (being best possible outcome) and maximum score of 13 (worst possible scar outcome).
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Oklahoma

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Mims, M.D., Ph.D., University of Oklahoma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OU-SCC-TOPSCAR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Paramedian Forehead Flap

Clinical Trials on Vantage Hemp CBD Isolate + Silicone patch

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings