Cryocompression to Reduce Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Gynecologic Cancer - COHORT 2

June 1, 2026 updated by: Duke University

Use of Cryocompression to Reduce Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Gynecologic Cancer: a Randomized Controlled Trial - COHORT 2

The investigators aim to determine the effect of cryotherapy wraps plus compression therapy (henceforth referred to as cryocompression) versus cryotherapy wraps alone on the incidence and degree of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with gynecologic cancer using a noninferiority design. The investigators also aim to determine the effect of cryocompression versus cryotherapy on patient tolerability and patient and staff satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Participants will be randomized by patient to receive cryotherapy wraps plus compression therapy (cryocompression) versus cryotherapy wraps alone applied to the bilateral hands and feet. Participants will receive cryotherapy (+/- compression) for the duration of their taxane infusions. Participants will be asked to complete the FACT-NTX survey and a PNQ neuropathy surveys at each infusion visit to evaluate symptoms related to neuropathy. Participants will also complete a brief acceptability and tolerability survey at each visit. Lastly, a staff satisfaction survey will be administered at each visit as well. The investigators will test the hypothesis that the average final visit FACT-NTX11 scores in the cryotherapy group are noninferior to the cryocompression group with a noninferiority margin of 2.5 points. The investigators will routinely monitor for the following adverse events: frost bite, (unexpected) hospitalizations, and death.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
190

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Mary K Anastasio
  • Phone Number: 225-603-7972
  • Email: mm765@duke.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • Hartford, Connecticut, United States, 06106
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Amy Brown, MD
        • Contact:
      • Middletown, Connecticut, United States, 06457
        • Recruiting
        • Middlesex Health Cancer Center - Middletown
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Karthikeyan Kandevelou, MD
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Recruiting
        • Duke University Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laura Havrilesky, MD
    • Virginia
      • Roanoke, Virginia, United States, 24016

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gynecologic cancer diagnosis (ovarian, cervical, endometrial cancer; adenocarcinomas of likely primary gynecologic origin based on cytology or FNA in conjunction with radiologic impression will be eligible)
  • Plan to receive at least 6 cycles of paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks at the Duke Cancer Center or Macon Pond or at the Carilion Clinic in Roanoke, VA. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a plan for interval debulking will be eligible.
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 0-1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treated with prior neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents
  • Baseline diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy such as diabetic neuropathy, or conditions including but not limited to fibromyalgia, cryoglobulinemia and Raynaud's disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cryotherapy
Behavioral: Cryotherapy
Participants will receive cryotherapy on both hands and feet
Experimental: Compression with Cryotherapy
Behavioral: Cryotherapy
Participants will receive cryotherapy on both hands and feet
Behavioral: Compression
Participants will receive compression on both hands and feet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) -Taxane [FACT-NTX] (patient reported assessment) over time
Time Frame: Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months
The FACT-NTX is a patient self-reported 11-item questionnaire used for evaluating symptoms and concerns specifically associated with chemotherapy induced neuropathy. The total score ranges from 0-44, and a lower FACT-NTX score corresponds to worsening neuropathy. For both the FACT-NTX and the sensory subscale of the FACT-NTX, a significant decrease in the score is defined as a decrease exceeding 10% from baseline.
Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tolerability of cryocompression: scale
Time Frame: Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months
Subjects will be asked to complete a cryocompression tolerability assessment after each chemotherapy session in which they will answer the question, "How tolerable was the cryocompression procedure for you?" on a scale from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means "not tolerable at all" and a score of 100 is "very tolerable". Pain, abnormal sensation, and adherence to cryocompression will also be evaluated as patient-reported measures of tolerability.
Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months
Acceptability: scale
Time Frame: Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months
Subjects will be asked to complete a cryocompression acceptability assessment after each chemotherapy session in which they answer the questions, "How acceptable was the cryocompression procedure to you?" and "How likely are you to continue with cryocompression at your next chemotherapy treatment?" on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 being "not acceptable, not likely to continue" and 100 being "very acceptable, very likely to continue".
Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months
Measure of manageability and acceptability for staff involved in the participants' care
Time Frame: Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months
Staff will be asked to complete an acceptability assessment after each chemotherapy session in which they will answer the question, "How manageable or acceptable was this patient's cryotherapy/cryocompression therapy to you in working with a patient receiving chemotherapy?" on a scale from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means "not at all acceptable" and a score of 100 is "complete acceptable". They will also be asked "In your experience, compare the ease of use of the cryotherapy wrap versus plastic ice bags" on a scale from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means "cryotherapy wraps are much harder," and a score of 100 means "cryotherapy wraps are much easier."
Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months
Change in Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire [PNQ] (patient reported assessment) over time
Time Frame: Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months
PNQ is a patient-reported questionnaire that consists of 2 items, representing motor and sensory components, with increasing grades for worsening symptoms. Patients will respond to each question for each of their 4 extremities by grading sensory and motor symptoms as A (no neuropathy), B (mild neuropathy), C (moderate neuropathy that does not interfere with activities of daily living [ADL]), D (moderate neuropathy that does interfere with ADL), or E (severe neuropathy that interferes with ADL).
Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months
Chemotherapy Dose
Time Frame: Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months
Study staff will record the taxol dose at each cycle
Up to two months after completion of chemotherapy, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Laura Havrilesky, DUHS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 18, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00106236_1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings