Evaluation of Open-face Maxillary Complete Denture for Patients With Prominent Premaxilla
Evaluation of Open-face Maxillary Complete Denture for Patients With Prominent Premaxilla. Crossover Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt, 21527
- Faculty of dentistry, Alexandria university
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Completely edentulous male patients.
- Patients having had no previous complete dentures
- Patients with well-developed edentulous ridge with proclined premaxilla covered with healthy firm mucosa
- Patients with normal Angle Class 1 maxillomandibular relationship
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with resorbed ridges
- Patients with xerostomia and patients undertaking medications that affect salivary flow (e.g., diuretics). Similarly, patients with systemic diseases that may affect the amount or consistency of saliva (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional denture
|
Patients in this group received conventional maxillary and mandibular complete dentures.
The patients used these dentures for 45 days.
Then, the conventional maxillary denture was replaced by open faced denture with soft acryl resin wing.
|
|
Experimental: maxillary open-faced denture
|
Patients in this group received a maxillary open faced denture with soft acryl resin wing and a conventional mandibular complete denture.
The patients used these dentures for 45 days.
Afterward, the maxillary open-faced denture was replaced by one with a conventional construction.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Denture retention
Time Frame: up to 45 days
|
Evaluated using a universal testing machine to exert a vertical dislodging force on the denture.
A stainless-steel loop was attached to the geometric center of the denture using autopolymerizing acrylic resin.
The center of the labial frenum (point A) and the hamular notches (points B&C) were located in the denture base.
The distance halfway between points B and C was measured, and the location was marked on the posterior border of the denture base (point D).
Half the distance between points A and D was marked as the denture base center (point E).
A force transmission device was used to transmit the dislodging vertical force from the universal testing machine to the denture.
A facebow was used to set the Frankfort plane of the patient parallel to the floor.
After orienting the participant to the testing machine, it was set to exert a dislodging force at a rate of 50 mm/min.
The test was repeated 3 times for each denture and the mean was calculated.
|
up to 45 days
|
|
Patient satisfaction with esthetics
Time Frame: up to 45 days
|
Participant satisfaction with esthetics was evaluated by using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The level of satisfaction was indicated as a sign on a 10 cm VAS, labeled with (not at all satisfied) at the zero end with (completely satisfied) at the other end.
The distance (mm) between the zero point and the sign marked by the patient on the 10-cm-line was measured and expressed in percentage.
|
up to 45 days
|
|
Patient satisfaction with comfort
Time Frame: up to 45 days
|
Participant satisfaction with comfort was evaluated by using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
The level of satisfaction was indicated as a sign on a 10 cm VAS, labeled with (not at all satisfied) at the zero end with (completely satisfied) at the other end.
The distance (mm) between the zero point and the sign marked by the patient on the 10-cm-line was measured and expressed in percentage.
|
up to 45 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Haitham A Ismail, MSc, Alexandria University
- Study Chair: Ingy S Soliman, PhD, Alexandria University
- Study Chair: Muhammed B El-Danasory, PhD, Alexandria University
- Study Chair: Salma S Abolgheit, PhD, Alexandria University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0672-04/2023
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.