Fluid Responsiveness Evaluation by a Non-invasive Method in Children, Extended to PREterm Infants - FRENCH-PREMA (FRENCH-PREMA)

February 27, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux
In this study, the investigators aim to validate a non-invasive marker of fluid-responsiveness in preterm infants (term below 37 gestational week) with acute circulatory failure based on standardized abdominal compression. This would allow physicians to identify which patient could benefit from a fluid expansion, thus avoiding a potentially useless or even dangerous fluid expansion, leading to fluid overload. To this end, the investigators will evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of stroke volume variation induced by standardized abdominal compression for the diagnosis of fluid responsiveness (based on the gold-standard test: significant increase in cardiac index after fluid expansion).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Fluid expansion is the cornerstone of acute circulatory failure treatment in children and preterm infants with acute circulatory failure. Although this therapy drastically reduced mortality, several studies in recent years have highlighted the adverse effects of excessive fluid expansion especially for preterm infants such as PDA, chronic lung disease and mortality. Currently, the search for indicators to predict fluid responsiveness is a major issue in neonatal intensive care. These indicators are based on Franck-Starling's law: if small changes in preload lead to an increase in cardiac output, then fluid responsiveness can be expected. However, in children, the only validated indicator (respiratory variability of peak aortic velocity) can only be used in the absence of any spontaneous respiratory movement, a rare situation in practice. Recently, two pediatric studies investigated a simple clinical test: hepatic or abdominal compression. This clinical maneuver, by increasing venous return via mobilization of the hepato-splanchnic reserve, induces a transient and reversible preload increase. The evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of this "endogenous fluid expansion" allowed, according to the authors, to accurately predict fluid responsiveness. However, several factors reduce the applicability of these results: the small number of studies on this subject, the smaller volume of fluid used than in clinical practice, and the population studied, composed almost exclusively of children in postoperative of cardiac surgery.

Thus, there is a need of reliable preloads markers to guide intravenous volume rescusitation in neonates.

In this study, the investigators will evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal compression for the diagnosis of fluid responsiveness in preterm infants (<37WA) with acute circulatory failure, hospitalized in neonatal intensive care unit for a medical or a non-cardiac surgical condition, for whom a fluid expansion was prescribed by the physician in charge. The index test will be the stroke volume variation following a standardized abdominal compression (before fluid expansion). The gold standard test will be the variation of cardiac output between baseline and after fluid expansion, a variation > 15% defining fluid responsiveness.

In this non interventional study of diagnostic accuracy, patients will undergo an extra echocardiographic assessment, but no supplemental blood test or invasive parameters will be collected. Simple clinical parameters will be collected within 4 hours after the fluid expansion.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • Recruiting
        • Bordeaux Hospital University
        • Contact:
          • Sophie CRAMAREGEAS, MD
          • Phone Number: 0557821269
        • Contact:
          • sophie.cramaregeas@chu-bordeaux.fr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

As this is a pilot study in a population of premature infants (term bellow 37 weeks of amenorrhea), the projected number of patients included will be 20, based on the department's active patient file, in order to have a minimum of 40 fluid expansion required for the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Premature newborn under 37 weeks of amenorrhea hospitalized in neonatal intensive care
  • Prescription of a 10 to 20ml/kg fluid expansion (crystalloid, blood products or albumin) by the physician in charge, whose goal would be to increase cardiac output (based on clinical, biological and/or echographic criteria).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema
  • Hemodynamic instability making the delay necessary for abdominal compression and ultrasonography dangerous for the patient
  • Non corrected congenital cardiopathy, or inferior to 15 days postoperative. Intra-abdominal hypertension or painful abdominal palpation
  • Abdominal surgery in the last 15 days
  • Supine position contraindicated or deleterious
  • No investigator available to assess ultrasonographic measures
  • Impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window or restless patient making ultrasonography impossible

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
study of diagnostic accuracy
Patients included in this study would have received fluid expansion in all cases, as the prescription of 10 to 20ml/kg fluid expansion by the physician in charge is the main inclusion criterion.
Procedure: Non interventional study (study of diagnostic accuracy with an extra echocardiographic assessment).

Study of diagnostic accuracy (non-interventional, prospective, monocentric). Fluid expansion will be delayed for a few minutes while our index test is performed. After fluid expansion, patient will undergo an echocardiographic assessment of response to fluid expansion (gold-standard test). This will allow to test the diagnostic performance of the index test for the "prediction" of fluid responsiveness.

The index test is the ΔSVi-AC: indexed percentage of stroke volume variation between baseline and during a standardized abdominal compression. Stroke volume will be assessed by transthoracic echocardiography.

Patient will undergo 3 echocardiographic assessment: At baseline (stroke volume, cardiac output, left ventricular ejection fraction), During a standardized abdominal compression (stroke volume),After the 10 to 20ml/kg fluid expansion prescribed by the physician in charge (cardiac output).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) of the index test (ΔSVi-AC) for the diagnosis of fluid responsiveness,
Time Frame: after abdominal compression, 30 minutes to 4 hours after baseline

Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) of the index test (ΔSVi-AC) for the diagnosis of fluid responsiveness, defined by an increase of cardiac output > 15% after fluid expansion (ΔCO-FE > 15%, gold-standard test) Index test (ΔSVi-AC) will be calculated as the difference between SV after abdominal compression and SV at baseline, divided by SV at baseline (%). SV will be measured by echocardiographic assessment.

Gold-standard test (ΔCO-FE) will be calculated as the difference between CO after fluid expansion and CO at baseline, divided by CO at baseline (%). CO will be measured by echocardiographic assessment.

value) of the index test (ΔSVi-AC) for the diagnosis of fluid responsiveness, defined by an increase of cardiac output > 15% after fluid expansion (ΔCO-FE > 15%, gold-standard test)
after abdominal compression, 30 minutes to 4 hours after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of the SAV mean and the ΔPeak for the diagnosis of fluid responsiveness
Time Frame: after abdominal compression, 30 minutes to 4 hours after baseline

Diagnostic accuracy of the SAV mean and the ΔPeak for the diagnosis of fluid responsiveness, defined by an increase of cardiac output > 15% after fluid expansion (ΔCO-FE > 15%, gold-standard test) in preterm infants.

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of these tests.
after abdominal compression, 30 minutes to 4 hours after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Bordeaux

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sophie CRAMAREGEAS, Bordeaux Hospital University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 17, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 17, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 17, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CHUBX 2023/32

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings