Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Four-Point Scleral Intraocular Lens Fixation and Yamane Techniques
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Warsaw, Poland, 04-141
- Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- only adult men and women with aphakia without capsular support
Exclusion Criteria:
- Fuchs' dystrophy
- corneal haze or scarring
- history of corneal transplantation
- astigmatism of more than 2,0D
- clinically active uveitis
- advanced glaucoma
- macular diseases that affect visual acuity (age-related macular degeneration, diabetic maculopathy)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Four-point scleral fixation group
|
Intrascleral tunnels were marked at a distance of 2 mm from the corneal limbus, 6 mm apart (4 in number) after retrobulbar anesthesia.
Next corneal incisions were performed.
An artificial lens was then implanted into the anterior chamber.
The 6-0 polypropylene suture was introduced into the anterior chamber through openings in the cornea.
The next stage was to perform a sclerotomy using a 30G needle.
Then the needle was passed through the hole in the haptic and 6-0 polypropylene suture was inserted into the needle hole and guided outside.
The other end of the suture, passed through the opening in the haptic, was placed in the lumen of the needle and carried out through another sclerotomy and then externalised.
This maneuver was repeated with another haptics as well.
Correct position of the IOL in the eye was achieved by pulling on the ends of the monofilament.
The ends of sutures were trimmed and cauterized.
The melted tips of the sutures were then fixed subconjunctivally.
|
|
Active Comparator: Yamane technique group
|
The surgery was performed under retrobulbar anesthesia.
The first step of the procedure was to mark the locations of the intrascleral tunnels (2 mm from the corneal limbus) and locate them at a distance of 180° from each other to prevent the lens from tilting in the eyeball.
Openings in the cornea were done.
Three-piece IOL was implanted into the anterior chamber.
The first sclerotomy was performed through the conjunctiva using a 30G needle 2 mm from the limbus.
One of the haptics was inserted into the needle lumen and then brought out.
Same procedure was performed with another haptic at a distance of 180°.
The next step was to perform cautery of the tips of the haptics, obtaining a 0.3 mm collar that prevents the risk of the haptic coming out of the tunnel and displacing the lens inside the eyeball.
The tips of the haptics were finally gently inserted into the scleral canals and covered with conjunctiva.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
BCVA
Time Frame: before and 12 months after surgery
|
The change of best- corrected visual acuity
|
before and 12 months after surgery
|
|
RE
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
|
Postoperative total refractive error
|
12 months after surgery
|
|
ECC
Time Frame: before and 12 months after surgery
|
corneal endothelial cell density
|
before and 12 months after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of complications
Time Frame: from day 1 until 12 months after surgery
|
Rate of complications
|
from day 1 until 12 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Natalia Blagun, MD, Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 11/WIM/2021
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aphakia
-
NCT04176965CompletedEye Diseases | Cataract | Lens Opacities | Postcataract Aphakia
-
NCT06399211CompletedEye Diseases | Cataract | Astigmatism | Lens Opacities | Postcataract Aphakia
-
NCT03437434UnknownAphakia, Acquired
-
NCT05821101Active, not recruitingAphakia, Postcataract
-
NCT06363448CompletedAphakia, Postcataract
-
NCT07347379Enrolling by invitation
-
NCT04005651CompletedAphakia, Postcataract | Cataract; Eye Disease
-
NCT06102109RecruitingLens Luxation | IOL Subluxation | IOL Opacification | Aphakia - No Lens Capsule