Safety and Efficacy of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL) POD L GF in Comparison With a Multifocal and a Monofocal IOL

April 18, 2023 updated by: Beaver-Visitec International, Inc.

Post-Market Follow-up Clinical Trial to Investigate Safety and Efficacy of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL) POD L GF In Comparison With a Multifocal (TECNIS Symfony® Extended Range of Vision IOL) and a Monofocal (AcrySof® IQ Monofocal IOL)

The objectives of the Post-Market Follow-up (PMCF) clinical investigation are to determine the safety and performance of a hydrophobic trifocal intraocular lens POD L GF in comparison with two comparator lenses: another multifocal intraocular lens (Johnson & Johnson TECNIS Symfony® Extended Range of Vision IOL); and a monofocal intraocular lens (Alcon AcrySof® IQ Monofocal IOL) through one year of post-operative assessments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, active controlled comparative binocular Post Market Follow-up (PMCF) clinical study to demonstrate safety and efficacy between the trifocal intraocular lens POD L GF and the Johnson & Johnson TECNIS Symfony® Extended Range of Vision IOL and the Alcon AcrySof® IQ Monofocal IOL.

Patients who are scheduled to undergo cataract extraction in one or both eyes and posterior chamber intraocular lens implants may be screened for eligibility in the study and, if eligible, complete a pre-operative screening visit. Both eyes of subjects who are eligible to receive the POD L GF IOL or the Johnson & Johnson TECNIS Symfony® Extended Range of Vision IOL must be eligible to receive bilateral multifocal IOL implants. Both eyes of subjects who are eligible to receive the Alcon AcrySof® IQ Monofocal IOL must be eligible to receive bilateral monofocal IOL implants.

At the time of the first eye surgery, the subjects to be implanted with either the POD L GF (test) IOL or the Johnson & Johnson TECNIS Symfony® Extended Range of Vision (comparator) IOL will be randomized to receive either the test or comparator IOL in a 1:1 ratio. In addition, 50 subjects will be implanted with the Alcon AcrySof® IQ Monofocal IOL. All subjects will undergo bilateral IOL implantation and will receive the same brand of lenses in each eye. Second eye implantations will be delayed until 1 to 30 days after the first eye implantation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France, 44300
        • OphtALLIANCE Clinique Jules Verne
      • Ahaus, Germany, 48683
        • Augenklinik Ahaus
      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40212
        • Internationale Innovative Ophthalmochirgie
      • Rheine, Germany, 48429
        • Augentagesklinik Rheine
      • Madrid, Spain, 28003
        • IOA Madrid Innova Ocular

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female adults ages 45 or older on the day of screening who have cataract(s) in one or both eyes
  • Capability to understand and sign an Ethics Committee (EC) approved informed consent form and privacy authorization
  • Corrected visual acuity projected by potential acuity meter (PAM) testing or other potential visual acuity test procedure to be better than 20/32 after intraocular lens implantation
  • Clear intraocular media other than cataract
  • Calculated IOL power is within the range of the study IOLs
  • Dilated pupil size large enough to visualize IOL axis markings postoperatively
  • Willing and able to conform to the study requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with diagnosed degenerative visual disoerders (e.g., macular degeneration or other retinal or optic disorders) that are predicted to cause future acuity losses to a level of 20/30 or worse
  • Subjects with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) suspicious eyes as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination
  • Subjects who may be expected to require retinal laser treatment during the course of the study or at a greater risk of developing cystoid macular edema
  • Greater than 1 diopter of pre-operative corneal astigmatism or any irregular astigmatism
  • Previous intraocular or corneal surgery
  • Traumatic cataract
  • History or presence of macular edema
  • Pregnant,lactating or, if able to bear children, unwilling to use medically acceptable birth control over the course of the study
  • Concurrent or previous (within 30 days) participation in another drug or device investigation
  • Instability of keratometry or biometry measurements
  • Ocular hypertension or glaucoma
  • Significant dry eye
  • Unsuitable for study participation for any other reason, as determined by Investigator's clinical judgement (reason to be documented on eCRF)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: POD L GF
Approximately 50 subjects who are scheduled for multifocal IOL implantation and enrolled in the study will be randomized into the POD L GF arm. Subjects will be implanted bilaterally with the European Conformity (CE) marked POD L GF trifocal IOL and assessed according to the study visit schedule.
Cataractous lens will be removed in the study eyes and the POD L GF IOL will be implanted in the capsular bag
Active Comparator: Symfony®
Approximately 50 subjects who are scheduled for multifocal IOL implantation and enrolled in the study will be randomized into the Symfony arm. Subjects will be implanted bilaterally with the CE marked TECNIS Symfony® IOL and assessed according to the study visit schedule.
Cataractous lens will be removed in the study eyes and the Symfony® IOL will be implanted in the capsular bag
Active Comparator: AcrySof®
Approximately 50 subjects who are scheduled for monofocal IOL implantation and enrolled in the study will be placed in the AcrySof® arm. Subjects will be implanted bilaterally with the CE marked AcrySof® IQ monofocal IOL and assessed according to the study visit schedule.
Cataractous lens will be removed in the study eyes and the AcrySof® IOL will be implanted in the capsular bag

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CDVA in first implanted eyes
Time Frame: Day 120-180 both eyes
Photopic monocular logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in first implanted eyes at Visit 4
Day 120-180 both eyes
DCIVA in first implanted eyes
Time Frame: Day 120-180 both eyes
Photopic monocular logMAR intermediate visual acuity with distance correction (DCIVA) in first implanted eyes at Visit 4
Day 120-180 both eyes
DCNVA in first implanted eyes
Time Frame: Day 120-180 both eyes
Photopic monocular logMAR near visual acuity with distance correction (DCNVA) in first implanted eyes at Visit 4
Day 120-180 both eyes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UDVA at Visits 3A, 3B, 4, and 5
Time Frame: Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
Photopic monocular logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA)
Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
UIVA at Visits 3A, 3B, 4, and 5
Time Frame: Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
Photopic monocular logMAR uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA)
Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
UNVA at Visits 3A, 3B, 4, and 5
Time Frame: Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
Photopic monocular logMAR uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA)
Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
CDVA at Visits 3A, 3B, 4, and 5
Time Frame: Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
Photopic monocular logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)
Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
DCIVA at Visits 3A, 3B, 4, and 5
Time Frame: Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
Photopic monocular logMAR intermediate visual acuity with distance correction (DCIVA)
Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
DCNVA at Visits 3A, 3B, 4, and 5
Time Frame: Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
Photopic monocular logMAR corrected near visual acuity with distance correction (DCNVA)
Day 30-60 post first eye (3A), day 30-60 post second eye (3B), day 120-180 both eyes (4), day 330-420 both eyes (5)
Quality of Vision Questionnaire (QoV) quality of vision at Visit 4
Time Frame: Day 120-180 both eyes
Quality of vision based on response to each question in the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire at Visit 4. Answer is a choice of 4 options, the first being the least and the fourth being the most based on question type, i.e. "never" to "very often" or "not at all" to "severe".
Day 120-180 both eyes
Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) quality of vision at Visit 4
Time Frame: Day 120-180 both eyes
Quality of vision based on response (choice of 0-3 with 0 meaning no difficulty and 3 meaning extreme difficulty) to each question in the Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) at Visit 4.
Day 120-180 both eyes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Endpoint: Rates of AEs (Adverse Events)
Time Frame: Enrollment (Day -30 to -1) through study exit or Visit 5 (Day 330 to 420 both eyes), whichever comes first
Rates of posterior chamber IOL adverse events compared to the ISO Safety and Performance Endpoint (SPE) rates as described in International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 11979-7
Enrollment (Day -30 to -1) through study exit or Visit 5 (Day 330 to 420 both eyes), whichever comes first
Safety Endpoint: Optical and Visual Symptoms Assessed with NAVQ
Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 120 to 180 both eyes)
Subject questionnaire frequency of optical and visual symptoms as reported in NAVQ
Visit 4 (Day 120 to 180 both eyes)
Safety Endpoint: Optical and Visual Symptoms Assessed with QoV questionnaire
Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 120 to 180 both eyes)
Subject questionnaire frequency of optical and visual symptoms as reported in QOV questionnaire
Visit 4 (Day 120 to 180 both eyes)
Safety Endpoint: Secondary Surgical Interventions
Time Frame: Operative Visit (Day 0) through study exit or Visit 5 (Day 330 to 420 both eyes), whichever comes first
Rates of device-related secondary surgical interventions related to the POD L GF trifocal IOL
Operative Visit (Day 0) through study exit or Visit 5 (Day 330 to 420 both eyes), whichever comes first
Safety Endpoint: Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Day 330 to 420 both eyes
The rate of serious adverse events related to teh POD L GF trifocal IOL in first implanted eyes through Visit 5
Day 330 to 420 both eyes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Christophe Pagnoulle, PhysIOL s.a.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 27, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PHY1804

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphakia, Postcataract

Clinical Trials on POD L GF IOL

3
Subscribe