CGM Academy for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes
Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Impact of CGM Academy Education Curriculum Versus Standard Care on Glycemic Outcomes for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effects of a virtual education curriculum in blood glucose variation of youth with type 1 diabetes wearing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- Do participants undertaking the proposed curriculum present improved glucose variation than participants of standard education?
- Explore relationships between participant's glycemic outcomes with diabetes distress, diabetes family responsibilities, and number of hours of diabetes education.
Participants in the intervention group will:
- receive an interactive workbook with problem-based learning scenarios and video links about CGM and glucose management strategies.
- participate in four in-depth online group sessions with diabetes care and education specialists
- complete questionnaires three times: at the time of study enrollment, week 4 and 6 months.
Participants in the comparison group will:
- receive standard education provided to all patients at CHLA
- complete questionnaires three times: at the time of study enrollment, week 4 and 6 months.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Rebecca Barber, PhD, RN
- Phone Number: 11359 (323) 361-1359
- Email: rbarber@chla.usc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Natalia Garban
- Email: ngarban@chla.usc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
- Recruiting
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles
-
Contact:
- Natalia Garban
- Email: ngarban@chla.usc.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Rebecca Barber, PhD, RN
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Current age of 8-18 years, age group eligible for CGM therapy with Dexcom G6 and G7
- T1D duration ≥6 months, as insulin adjustments during honeymoon stage differs from establishedT1D
- Able to speak, read, and write English or Spanish
- Smartphone compatible with Dexcom G6 and G7application
- Ability to participate in virtual visits
Exclusion Criteria:
• Known history of medical adhesive allergies
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: CGM Academy
|
Educational materials as well as online sessions with diabetes educators.
|
|
No Intervention: Standard Diabetes Education
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean change in Hemoglobin A1c from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
Change in Hemoglobin A1c
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean change in HbA1c (%) from baseline to 6 months.
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
Change in Hemoglobin A1c
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
Mean change in CGM metrics measured by CGM readings
Time Frame: Week 4 & 6 months
|
% Glucose Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL), % Glucose Time Below Range (<70mg/dL), % Glucose Time Above Range (>180mg/dL).
|
Week 4 & 6 months
|
|
Average number of diabetes educator hours used per study participant at week 4 & 6 months.
Time Frame: Week 4 and 6 months
|
Number of hours spent in diabetes education
|
Week 4 and 6 months
|
|
Change in perceived diabetes distress at baseline, week 4 & 6 months
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4 & 6 months
|
The Problem Areas in Diabetes survey (PAID) is an 18-item survey to assess the perceived burden associated with diabetes.
Youth and caregivers are given statements about diabetes-related issues and report on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not a problem, 1 = minor problem, 2 = moderate problem, 3 = somewhat serious problem, 4 = serious problem) the degree to which the statements are a problem for them.
Increasing scores denote increased burden perceived.
|
Baseline, Week 4 & 6 months
|
|
Change in perceived diabetes family responsibility at baseline, week 4 & 6 months.
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4 & 6 months
|
The Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ) is a 14-item validated survey assessing parental and child involvement in various diabetes management tasks.
Youth and caregivers report on a 3-point scale (1=child, 2=equal, 3=parent) who is responsible for a given diabetes task.
Higher scores indicate more parental involvement in diabetes management.
|
Baseline, week 4 & 6 months
|
|
Perceived benefits of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) use
Time Frame: week 4 & 6 months
|
Adolescent Benefits and Burdens of CGM Survey - BenCGM & BurCGM.
Participants answer each question on a scale of Strong Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly Agree.
|
week 4 & 6 months
|
|
Perceived burden of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) use
Time Frame: week 4 & 6 months
|
Adolescent Benefits and Burdens of CGM Survey - BenCGM & BurCGM.
Participants answer each question on a scale of Strong Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly Agree.
|
week 4 & 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rebecca Barber, PhD, RN, Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CHLA-23-00298
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.