Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Abdullah Hilmi Yılmaz, MD
- Phone Number: 0432 222 00 10
- Email: drabdullahhilmi@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Van, Turkey
- Recruiting
- University of Health Science Van Training and Research Hospital
-
Contact:
- Abdullah Hilmi Yılmaz, MD
- Phone Number: 0432 222 00 10
- Email: drabdullahhilmi@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with inguinal hernias.
- Patients aged over 65.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Younger than 65 years.
- Incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Laparoscopic TEP Repair under General Anesthesia
A mini-incision was made at the umbilical margin, passing through the skin and subcutaneous tissue to expose the external sheath of the rectus muscle.
The RS was incised, and the rectus muscle was laterally displaced.
A 10-mm trocar was inserted into the preperitoneal space, and CO2 insufflation was performed with a pressure set at 12 mmHg.
Two additional 5 mm trocars were inserted between the umbilicus and the symphysis pubis under laparoscopic guidance.
Using laparoscopic dissectors and graspers, all steps of myopectineal orifice dissection were performed (16).
A 15 × 10 cm prolene mesh was spread and secured to cover both direct and indirect hernia areas, extending approximately 2-3 cm beyond.
Trocars were removed under camera surveillance after CO2 desufflation, and the skin was closed.
|
Laparoscopic TEP Repair performed
|
|
Active Comparator: Open Technique (Lichtenstein) under Spinal Anesthesia
Following a classic inguinal incision of approximately 5-7 cm extending laterally from the pubic tubercle, the external oblique aponeurosis was opened, the external ring was disrupted, and the spermatic cord/round ligament was suspended.
The hernia sac was isolated from surrounding tissues and the spermatic cord/round ligament, then either reduced or ligated.
Subsequently, a polypropylene mesh measuring approximately 60x110 mm² was placed to completely cover the transverse fascia, and continuous sutures were used to secure it laterally along the transverse arch starting from the pubic tubercle.
Hemostasis was achieved, and the layers and skin were anatomically closed.
|
Open Technique (Lichtenstein) performed
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
rate of postoperative mortality
Time Frame: postoperative 24 hours
|
postoperative 24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Postoperative complications
Time Frame: postoperative 24 hours and 1st month
|
such as wound infection, bleeding
|
postoperative 24 hours and 1st month
|
|
rate of urinary retansion
Time Frame: postoperative 24 hours
|
postoperative 24 hours
|
|
|
rate of postoperative pain
Time Frame: postoperative 24 hours
|
postoperative 24 hours
|
|
|
Rate of Hernia recurrence
Time Frame: first year
|
first year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Vigneswaran Y, Gitelis M, Lapin B, Denham W, Linn J, Carbray J, Ujiki M. Elderly and octogenarian cohort: Comparable outcomes with nonelderly cohort after open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. Surgery. 2015 Oct;158(4):1137-43; discussion 1143-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
- Xi S, Chen Z, Lu Q, Liu C, Xu L, Lu C, Cheng R. Comparison of laparoscopic and open inguinal-hernia repair in elderly patients: the experience of two comprehensive medical centers over 10 years. Hernia. 2024 Apr 4. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03004-0. Online ahead of print.
- Bowling K, El-Badawy S, Massri E, Rait J, Atkinson J, Leong S, Stuart A, Srinivas G. Laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: Patient reported outcomes in the elderly from a single centre - A prospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Aug 29;22:12-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.08.013. eCollection 2017 Oct.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Urologic Diseases
- Urination Disorders
- Pathological Conditions, Anatomical
- Hernia, Abdominal
- Hernia
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Urogenital Diseases
- Male Urogenital Diseases
- Hernia, Inguinal
- Postoperative Complications
- Urinary Retention
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 65646564
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.