mindBEAGLE: Unlocking Functional Communication for Patients With Disorders of Consciousness

June 2, 2026 updated by: Amy Wagner

Unlocking Functional Communication for Patients With Disorders of Consciousness With Innovative Brain Computer Interface Technology

The goal of this clinical trial is to test how effective the mindBEAGLE device is in allowing people who are unconscious (due to a brain injury or other condition) to communicate using brain waves to answer Yes/No questions. Participants will wear a cap that will be connected to a computer that measures brain waves, wrist bands that vibrate at different strengths, and ear phones that create different levels of loud tones and will be asked to associate Yes/No answers with the vibrations or tones. They will also be asked to "think about" moving different parts of their body to answer Yes or No. The mindBEAGLE device has already been proven effective for this kind of communication in a previous study, and the study team would like to trial it on a population of unconscious people who enter the UPMC Rehabilitation Institute to see if patients are able to be trained to use the device as part of their everyday inpatient rehabilitation until they are discharged, or until they are able to regain consciousness.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The team's research reflects an integrated clinical and research team who will characterize and implement an aggressive and innovative approach using brain-computer interface (BCI) technology for Disorders of Consciousness (DoC) evaluation, prognostication, and rehabilitation care. The work proposed strives for equity in accessing healthcare systems and technology effectively, even among vulnerable individuals with profound levels of disability due to their DoC state.

The "gold-standard" for assessing cognitive capacity among patients with DoC relies on behavioral response observations and neuroimaging modalities. However, these approaches underestimate patients' capabilities. The current problem is that without other clinical data, rehabilitation teams rely solely on observable behavioral changes in patients' awareness of their environment in order to treat and improve communication. The project's challenge rests with implementing BCI focused assistive technology that identifies a unique and specific electrophysiological biomarker of cognitive and communication capacities that cannot be tapped using current clinical tools. If successful, this approach will allow clinical teams to initiate treatment and communication, avoiding therapeutic delays arising from traditional methods that require behavioral indicators needed to participate in functional communication.

The P300 wave is a positive deflection in the human event-related potential. It is most commonly elicited in an "oddball" paradigm when a subject detects an occasional "target" stimulus in a regular train of standard stimuli.

This project will compare standard awareness training methods used at the UPMC RI Brain Injury program with novel BCI research by using mindBEAGLE, a suite of P300 paradigms (vibrations, sound tones, and mental visualization) used for cognitive and communication assessment and treatment. European studies using the mindBEAGLE system with DoC patients reveal patients' cognitive and communication capabilities that impact current functional assessment and influence prognostication and recovery. The mindBEAGLE gives additional diagnostic data to enhance clinical neuroscience practice by showing reactions to stimuli that benefit from electroencephalogram (EEG) P300 use. However, clinical neuroscience implementation studies have not been conducted. Armed with more detailed and accurate assessments from this study, the investigators are confident that the clinical teams will be able to offer exciting rehabilitation treatments designed by UPMC RI treatment teams, patients, and families that leverage the mindBEAGLE interface for functional communication. Specifically, the EEG-based mindBEAGLE BCI suite will provide a practical platform for cognitive assessment of command following and a communication system for patients with DoC that will allow the research teams to offer more intensive, multidimensional rehabilitation treatments that meet the UPMC ideal of Life Changing Medicine.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Katherine Hill, Ph.D.
  • Phone Number: (412) 647-1310
  • Email: khill@pitt.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • UPMC Center for Assistive Technology
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15219
        • UPMC Rehabilitation Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 16-65
  • Medically able to tolerate Disorders of Consciousness (DoC) rehabilitation program as determined by UPMC Physicians
  • Locked in Syndrome (LIS) patients who show clinical evidence of intact cognition via some form of alternative communication methods
  • Clinically assessed capacity for functional improvement in the rehabilitation environment
  • Measuring improvements with pharmacological stimulation (using JFK Coma Recovery Scale)
  • Electrophysiological prognostic testing confirming brain activity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coma
  • Bilateral non-response with standard electrophysiological studies
  • Medical instability
  • Open scalp wound

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: mindBEAGLE trial participants
Patients identified as "disorders of consciousness" admitted to UPMC Rehabilitation Institute will be considered for the trial. As patients will not be able to communicate, health care proxy will provide consent. Participants will undergo 3 trials across 5 days within a 10-day period (2-3 hours each ) to assess if they are responding to the device.
Device: mindBEAGLE daily device use
If participants are considered responsive, they will continue to use the device daily for the remainder of their stay at inpatient rehab, or until they regain consciousness.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of mindBEAGLE treatment by clinical staff.
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks Post-intervention
Clinicians agree that mindBEAGLE is feasible to implement with DOC patients in the inpatient setting.
Within 2 weeks Post-intervention
Acceptability of mindBEAGLE treatment by families of DOC patients.
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks Post-intervention
Family/Caregivers of DOC patient agree that the mindBEAGLE was beneficial.
Within 2 weeks Post-intervention
Neural and Multisensory DOC mindBEAGLE Initial Classification Accuracy Assessment
Time Frame: 18 months

The ability to answer Yes/No questions at over above 40% accuracy using 1 of the following paradigms:

  1. auditory evoked potentials;
  2. vibro-tactile stimulation with 2 tactors;
  3. vibro-tactile stimulation with 3 tactors;
  4. vibro-tactile stimulation with 7 tactors;
  5. motor imagery.
18 months
DOC mindBEAGLE Communication Assessment
Time Frame: 18 months

Among DOC patients who pass initial classification assessment: ability to communicate yes/no questions at or above 40% accuracy with one of the two P300 paradigms.

mindBEAGLE P300 paradigm #1

  1. Baseline - No response to yes/no questions
  2. Change in baseline - Response to yes/no questions using mindBEAGLE

mindBEAGLE P300 paradigm #2

  1. Baseline - 0% accuracy on yes/no questions
  2. Change in baseline - 60% or higher in response to yes/no questions.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Amy Wagner

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The Beckwith Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Amy Wagner, M.D., University of Pittsburgh
  • Principal Investigator: Katherine Hill, Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 2, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY23080022
  • BECKW/12863 (Other Grant/Funding Number: UPMC Beckwith Institute)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

It is possible that the investigators may use the information obtained from this study in other future research studies. All information disseminated to outside collaborators or entities will be done in a de-identified manner so as to mitigate a breach of confidentiality and protect PHI/PII. Data will be coded using unique identifying numbers that do not contain PII. Any links to PII will be kept locally but will not be disseminated to outside collaborators.

Any data shared with outside institutions or collaborators will be conducted under the guidelines of an approved data use agreement between the University of Pittsburgh and the collaborating entity. This includes any plans to publish published peer-reviewed manuscripts.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings