mindBEAGLE: Unlocking Functional Communication for Patients With Disorders of Consciousness

January 7, 2026 updated by: Amy Wagner

Unlocking Functional Communication for Patients With Disorders of Consciousness With Innovative Brain Computer Interface Technology

The goal of this clinical trial is to test how effective the mindBEAGLE device is in allowing people who are unconscious (due to a brain injury or other condition) to communicate using brain waves to answer Yes/No questions. Participants will wear a cap that will be connected to a computer that measures brain waves, wrist bands that vibrate at different strengths, and ear phones that create different levels of loud tones and will be asked to associate Yes/No answers with the vibrations or tones. They will also be asked to "think about" moving different parts of their body to answer Yes or No. The mindBEAGLE device has already been proven effective for this kind of communication in a previous study, and the study team would like to trial it on a population of unconscious people who enter the UPMC Rehabilitation Institute to see if patients are able to be trained to use the device as part of their everyday inpatient rehabilitation until they are discharged, or until they are able to regain consciousness.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The team's research reflects an integrated clinical and research team who will characterize and implement an aggressive and innovative approach using brain-computer interface (BCI) technology for Disorders of Consciousness (DoC) evaluation, prognostication, and rehabilitation care. The work proposed strives for equity in accessing healthcare systems and technology effectively, even among vulnerable individuals with profound levels of disability due to their DoC state.

The "gold-standard" for assessing cognitive capacity among patients with DoC relies on behavioral response observations and neuroimaging modalities. However, these approaches underestimate patients' capabilities. The current problem is that without other clinical data, rehabilitation teams rely solely on observable behavioral changes in patients' awareness of their environment in order to treat and improve communication. The project's challenge rests with implementing BCI focused assistive technology that identifies a unique and specific electrophysiological biomarker of cognitive and communication capacities that cannot be tapped using current clinical tools. If successful, this approach will allow clinical teams to initiate treatment and communication, avoiding therapeutic delays arising from traditional methods that require behavioral indicators needed to participate in functional communication.

The P300 wave is a positive deflection in the human event-related potential. It is most commonly elicited in an "oddball" paradigm when a subject detects an occasional "target" stimulus in a regular train of standard stimuli.

This project will compare standard awareness training methods used at the UPMC RI Brain Injury program with novel BCI research by using mindBEAGLE, a suite of P300 paradigms (vibrations, sound tones, and mental visualization) used for cognitive and communication assessment and treatment. European studies using the mindBEAGLE system with DoC patients reveal patients' cognitive and communication capabilities that impact current functional assessment and influence prognostication and recovery. The mindBEAGLE gives additional diagnostic data to enhance clinical neuroscience practice by showing reactions to stimuli that benefit from electroencephalogram (EEG) P300 use. However, clinical neuroscience implementation studies have not been conducted. Armed with more detailed and accurate assessments from this study, the investigators are confident that the clinical teams will be able to offer exciting rehabilitation treatments designed by UPMC RI treatment teams, patients, and families that leverage the mindBEAGLE interface for functional communication. Specifically, the EEG-based mindBEAGLE BCI suite will provide a practical platform for cognitive assessment of command following and a communication system for patients with DoC that will allow the research teams to offer more intensive, multidimensional rehabilitation treatments that meet the UPMC ideal of Life Changing Medicine.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • UPMC Center for Assistive Technology
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15219
        • UPMC Rehabilitation Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 16-65
  • Medically able to tolerate Disorders of Consciousness (DoC) rehabilitation program as determined by UPMC Physicians
  • Locked in Syndrome (LIS) patients who show clinical evidence of intact cognition via some form of alternative communication methods
  • Clinically assessed capacity for functional improvement in the rehabilitation environment
  • Measuring improvements with pharmacological stimulation (using JFK Coma Recovery Scale)
  • Electrophysiological prognostic testing confirming brain activity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coma
  • Bilateral non-response with standard electrophysiological studies
  • Medical instability
  • Open scalp wound

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: mindBEAGLE trial participants
Patients identified as "disorders of consciousness" admitted to UPMC Rehabilitation Institute will be considered for the trial. As patients will not be able to communicate, health care proxy will provide consent. Participants will undergo 3 trials across 5 days within a 10-day period (2-3 hours each ) to assess if they are responding to the device.
If participants are considered responsive, they will continue to use the device daily for the remainder of their stay at inpatient rehab, or until they regain consciousness.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of mindBEAGLE treatment by clinical staff.
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks Post-intervention
Clinicians agree that mindBEAGLE is feasible to implement with DOC patients in the inpatient setting.
Within 2 weeks Post-intervention
Acceptability of mindBEAGLE treatment by families of DOC patients.
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks Post-intervention
Family/Caregivers of DOC patient agree that the mindBEAGLE was beneficial.
Within 2 weeks Post-intervention
Neural and Multisensory DOC mindBEAGLE Initial Classification Accuracy Assessment
Time Frame: 18 months

The ability to answer Yes/No questions at over above 40% accuracy using 1 of the following paradigms:

  1. auditory evoked potentials;
  2. vibro-tactile stimulation with 2 tactors;
  3. vibro-tactile stimulation with 3 tactors;
  4. vibro-tactile stimulation with 7 tactors;
  5. motor imagery.
18 months
DOC mindBEAGLE Communication Assessment
Time Frame: 18 months

Among DOC patients who pass initial classification assessment: ability to communicate yes/no questions at or above 40% accuracy with one of the two P300 paradigms.

mindBEAGLE P300 paradigm #1

  1. Baseline - No response to yes/no questions
  2. Change in baseline - Response to yes/no questions using mindBEAGLE

mindBEAGLE P300 paradigm #2

  1. Baseline - 0% accuracy on yes/no questions
  2. Change in baseline - 60% or higher in response to yes/no questions.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy Wagner, M.D., University of Pittsburgh
  • Principal Investigator: Katherine Hill, Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

It is possible that the investigators may use the information obtained from this study in other future research studies. All information disseminated to outside collaborators or entities will be done in a de-identified manner so as to mitigate a breach of confidentiality and protect PHI/PII. Data will be coded using unique identifying numbers that do not contain PII. Any links to PII will be kept locally but will not be disseminated to outside collaborators.

Any data shared with outside institutions or collaborators will be conducted under the guidelines of an approved data use agreement between the University of Pittsburgh and the collaborating entity. This includes any plans to publish published peer-reviewed manuscripts.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disorders of Consciousness

Clinical Trials on mindBEAGLE daily device use

Subscribe