Monocentric Retrospective Observational Study; Analysis of Gore Excluder ACS Device Using Numerical Simulation (ACSSim)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bron, France, 69500
- Hôpital Louis Pradel
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
The patient:
- Is age ≥18 at the time of inclusion.
- Underwent EVAR with ACS Gore Excluder
- AAA proximal neck angulation superior to 60 degrees
- Pre-op CT and post-operative/follow-up CT available
Exclusion Criteria:
- Slice thickness of Pre-op or post-op / follow-up CT superior to 2mm.
- Non-injected or poorly injected pre-operative CT-scan precluding technical feasibility of the aortic digital twin
- Absence of post-operative or follow-up CT-scan
- Patient refusal of his personal information/medical data to be used in the context of the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Patients who underwent EVAR with ACS Gore excluder.
Patients who underwent EVAR with ACS Gore excluder.
Only patients with proximal neck angulation superior to 60 degrees will be considered.
|
analyzed on the post-operative scanner
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The aim of the present study is to investigate the accuracy of numerical simulation to predict stent-graft apposition of Gore ACS in highly angulated proximal AAA necks.
Time Frame: up to 16 months
|
Quantitative neck apposition parameters (including but not limited to malapposition length, width, angle) will be extracted both from numerical simulation and post-operative CT. Quantitative values will then be compared Comparison between quantitative neck apposition parameters (malapposition length, width, angle) derived from simulation and the one observed on post-op CT and/ or follow-up CT |
up to 16 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 69HCL24_0514
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.