Short-term Effects of an SGLT2 Inhibitor on Divalent Ions in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (SIDIA)

September 19, 2026 updated by: Patrick Hofmann, Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden

This study aims to better understand electrolyte handling in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease treated with the SGLT2 inhibitor Empagliflozin.

Patients will be randomized into two groups and take Empagliflozin or a Placebo for 2 weeks with a wash-out period of 2 weeks. The primary outcome is tubular handling of the divalent ions calcium, phosphate and magnesium. Secondary outcomes include diuresis, safety and tolerability.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This investigator-initiated randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study aims to better understand tubular electrolyte handling of divalent ions in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease treated with the SGLT2 inhibitor Empagliflozin.

After randomization, at week 0, participants collect 24-hour urine sample and a patient visit to assess vitals and blood tests takes place. After this visit, period 1 starts with a 2-week treatment of either Empagliflozin 10mg or Placebo.

At week 2, the second 24-hour-urine sample and 2. patient visit and blood test take place. After this visit, wash-out period for 2 weeks starts where no study drug will be administered At week 4, the period 2, the crossover-period starts for an additional 2 weeks. At week 6; a final and third 24-hour urine sample, clinical visit and blood test takes place.

At week 3 & 7, a phone consultation will assess safety.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
16

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • Canton of Zurich
      • Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
        • University Hospital Zurich, Division of Nephrology
    • Kanton Graubünden
      • Chur, Kanton Graubünden, Switzerland, 7000
        • Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Patients 18-75 years old with ADPKD, defined according to international diagnostic and classification criteria14, treated at Cantonal Hospital Graubünden (KSGR) and the University Hospital Zürich (USZ) independent of baseline treatment with the vasopressin receptor antagonist Tolvaptan
  • Informed consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - renal replacement therapy or kidney allograft recipient
  • chronic kidney disease CKD KDIGO Stage G4 (eGFR under 30ml/min/1.73m2)
  • patients younger 18 years of age
  • Diabetes mellitus type 1
  • recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) defined as more than 3 infections requiring antibiotic treatment or over 1 requiring hospitalization/year.
  • Patients with uncontrolled hypertension (defined as ambulatory systolic BP over 180mmHg), liver cirrhosis (Child Pugh B and C)
  • Patients not able or not willing to stop the following medications during the study period of participation in the trial:
  • Thiazide diuretics
  • Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors
  • Sodium bicarbonate
  • 1, 25 (OH) vitamin D (calcitriol)
  • Bisphosphonate, denosumab, teriparatide
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Known allergy to study drug
  • Inability to understand and follow the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention

Empagliflozin 10mg
Drug: Empagliflozin

Empagliflozin 10mg
Placebo Comparator: Control

Placebo
Drug: Placebo

Placebo capsule

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
24-hour Urinary Phosphate
Time Frame: End of each 14 day treatment period

Total phosphate excretion measured in a 24-hour urine collection at the end of each treatment period.
End of each 14 day treatment period
24-hour Urinary Calcium Excretion
Time Frame: End of each 14-day treatment period

Effect of empagliflozin compared with placebo on 24-hour urinary calcium excretion after each 14-day treatment period in a randomized crossover trial.
End of each 14-day treatment period
24-hour Urinary Magnesium Excretion
Time Frame: End of each 14-day treatment period

Effect of empagliflozin compared with placebo on 24-hour urinary magnesium excretion after each 14-day treatment period in a randomized crossover trial.
End of each 14-day treatment period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum Phosphate
Time Frame: End of each 14-day treatment period

Effect of empagliflozin compared with placebo on serum phosphate after each 14-day treatment period.
End of each 14-day treatment period
Serum Calcium
Time Frame: End of each 14-day treatment period

Effect of empagliflozin compared with placebo on serum calcium after each 14-day treatment period.
End of each 14-day treatment period
Serum Magnesium
Time Frame: End of each 14-day treatment period

Effect of empagliflozin compared with placebo on serum magnesium after each 14-day treatment period.
End of each 14-day treatment period
24-hour Urine Volume
Time Frame: End of each 14-day treatment period

Total urine volume collected over 24 hours at the end of each treatment period.
End of each 14-day treatment period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Zurich

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Fehr, MD, Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden
  • Principal Investigator: Patrick Hofmann, MD, Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 24, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 19, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2024-00070

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The local ethics committee approval does not include individual participant data sharing.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings