The Application of Root Analogy Implant in Immediate Implantation (RAI)
A Clinical Exploratory Study of Root Analogy Implant
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Yixu Chen
- Phone Number: +86 571 8721 9287
- Email: 11818293@zju.edu.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310006
- Recruiting
- The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Xiaowen Yu, Doctor
- Phone Number: +8615068107876
- Email: yuxiaowen@zju.edu.cn
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age:20-60 years old, gender unlimited
- Good oral hygiene
- No systemic diseases
- There are irreparable residual roots, no obvious apical periodontitis, no looseness greater than degree II, and the tooth position includes four quadrant anterior teeth and premolars
- Root length greater than 10 mm, and no significant bone resorption at the alveolar crest
- There is no significant displacement of adjacent teeth and no significant elongation of opposing teeth
- The bone density of the target implant area is Class II and Class III
- The lateral bone wall of the lips (cheeks), palate (tongue) is intact and larger than 1mm
- The subjects are able to understand the purpose of the experiment, willing to -cooperate with surgical treatment and follow-up, voluntarily participate in the experiment, and sign an informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with moderate to severe periodontitis
- Missing proximal and distal adjacent teeth in the target residual root
- Residual roots with root adhesion
- The target implant area has a bone density of Class I or IV
- Acute infectious disease or metabolic bone disease activity period
- Patients with diabetes history and poor blood glucose control (fasting blood glucose ≥ 8.8 mmol/L L)
- Patients with liver and kidney dysfunction (AST, ALT ≥ 1.5 times ULNULN, creatinine ≥ 1.5 times ULNULN)
- Individuals with a history of osteoporosis
- Individuals with a history of malignant tumors or other serious illnesses who are not suitable for surgery
- Individuals with mental disorders and lack of autonomous behavior ability Pregnant women, lactating or menstruating women, and women with pregnancy plans within six months
- Various possible causes of imaging artifacts in the surgical area
- Receiving medication that may affect bone metabolism (such as bisphosphonates) within the past 3 months
- The researchers estimate poor compliance or other factors that are not suitable for conducting this experiment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: implanted group
This study is a single arm study, with only immediate implantation of root analogy implants
|
Immediate implantation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Alveolar ridge height
Time Frame: day 0,12 weeks,24weeks,48weeks
|
The distance from the top of the alveolar ridge to the tip of the implant
|
day 0,12 weeks,24weeks,48weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Width of alveolar ridge, buccal and lingual directions
Time Frame: day 0,12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
|
The width of the implant platform from the buccal and lingual to the alveolar bone
|
day 0,12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
|
|
Implant mobility
Time Frame: day 0,12 weeks
|
Measure the movement of the implant using an implant mobility meter and record the ISQ value
|
day 0,12 weeks
|
|
Gingival condition
Time Frame: day 0, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48weeks
|
Two independent clinical doctors conducted gingival examination in the oral implant area of the patient, and gave a comprehensive score for gingival condition based on changes in gingival color, shape, and texture.
A 3-point scoring method was used, with good, average, and poor results.
|
day 0, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48weeks
|
|
Exploration depth and Exploring bleeding
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
|
Same periodontal probing.
Use blunt head periodontal probing to measure the depth of probing at six points around the implant, including the buccal mesial, buccal central, buccal distal, lingual palatal mesial, lingual palatal central, and lingual palatal distal.
Record the depth of probing and calculate the average value, 2-4mm if normal, if depth >5mm, consider the occurrence of periimplantitis.
The improved gingival sulcus bleeding index (mSBI) can be used to detect bleeding: 0=Along the periphery of the implant, no bleeding after soft tissue edge exploration; 1=scattered points after exploration, hemorrhage in shape; 2=After diagnosis, the bleeding appears linear in the groove; 3=severe or Spontaneous bleeding.
|
12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
|
|
Clinical looseness of implants
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
|
Evaluation of tooth looseness.
Use tweezers to clamp and shake the cutting edge during the examination of anterior dental implants; When checking the posterior dental implant, fold the forceps together and place them in the center of the occlusal fissure, shaking them towards the buccal, lingual (palatal), and mesial and distal directions (clamping the anterior tooth ridge, and pressing the posterior tooth forceps against the posterior occlusal fissure).
The commonly used method for recording tooth looseness in clinical practice is to calculate the degree of looseness in millimeters: degree I looseness: the looseness amplitude is within 1mm; Second degree loosening: the loosening amplitude is within 1-2mm; Third degree loosening: the loosening amplitude is above 2mm.
|
12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks
|
|
Recovery of chewing function
Time Frame: 24 weeks, 48 weeks
|
The basic method is to use a vernier ruler about 10 cm long, where "0" represents complete dissatisfaction and "10" represents complete satisfaction.
The patient marks the line segment based on their own satisfaction, and the physician scores them based on the position marked by the patient.
|
24 weeks, 48 weeks
|
|
Aesthetic satisfaction
Time Frame: 24 weeks,48 weeks
|
Use a survey questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction, including aesthetics and other suggestions and opinions on treatment.
The evaluation adopts a 3-point scoring method, which is satisfied, average, and dissatisfied.
|
24 weeks,48 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024035
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.