Optical Biopsy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

June 13, 2024 updated by: Jiayuan Sun, Shanghai Chest Hospital

Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

The purpose of the study is to describe confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) interpretation criteria for different types of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), with histopathological correlation, and to perform the validation of these criteria.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

CLE is a modern imaging technique that uses an excitation laser light to create real-time microscopic images of tissues. During transbronchial lung biopsy, CLE has the potential to provide real-time non-invasive diagnosis of PPLs ("optical biopsy"). In this study, we will obtain CLE images within the target lesion before taking a biopsy during transbronchial lung biopsy of PPLs. We will compare the results of the "optical biopsy" with the corresponding histopathological results and develop CLE interpretation criteria for different types of PPLs. In addition, we will perform the validation of these criteria to evaluate the ability of CLE to discriminate between benign and malignant PPLs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200030
        • Shanghai Chest Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions scheduled for transbronchial lung biopsy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients older than 18 years.
  2. Chest CT shows peripheral pulmonary lesions (peripheral pulmonary lesions are lesions beyond the segmental bronchi that are invisible during bronchoscopy), and transbronchial biopsy is considered necessary and feasible.
  3. Patients who have good compliance and sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with known allergy for fluorescein.
  2. Pregnant or lactating women.
  3. Patients with contraindications of bronchoscopy.
  4. The investigators believe that patient has other conditions that are not suitable for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions
A total of 150 patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be prospectively enrolled, of which 100 patients will be used for the development of CLE interpretation criteria, and 50 patients will be used for the validation of the criteria.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of CLE in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant PPLs
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
Diagnostic accuracy is defined as the number of lesions correctly identified as malignant or benign using our proposed CLE interpretation criteria divided by the total number of lesions.
6 months post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity, specificity of CLE in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant PPLs
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
Sensitivity is defined as the number of lesions correctly identified as malignant using our proposed CLE interpretation criteria divided by the total number of malignant lesions. Specificity is defined as the number of lesions correctly identified as benign using our proposed CLE interpretation criteria divided by the total number of benign lesions.
6 months post-procedure
positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CLE in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant PPLs
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
The positive predictive value is the percentage of true malignant lesions among all lesions identified as malignant using our proposed CLE interpretation criteria. The negative predictive value is the percentage of true benign lesions among all lesions identified as benign using our proposed CLE interpretation criteria.
6 months post-procedure
Diagnostic accuracy of CLE in differential diagnosis of different types of PPLs
Time Frame: 6 months post-procedure
Different types of PPLs include different types of common malignant PPLs (e.g., adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, small cell lung carcinoma, etc.) and different types of common benign PPLs (e.g., inflammation, tuberculosis, fungal infection, etc.). Diagnostic accuracy is defined as the number of lesions correctly identified as a specific disease using our proposed CLE interpretation criteria divided by the total number of lesions.
6 months post-procedure
Incidence of complications
Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure
Complications mean a composite of procedure related adverse advents during and after the operation.
1 month post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Chest Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Jiayuan Sun, Shanghai Chest Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 13, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SHCHE202402

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings