Feasibility of CALM in Patients With Ovarian Cancer

December 8, 2025 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

A Feasibility Trial of Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Advanced Ovarian Cancer

The goal of this feasibility trial is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a brief evidence-based psychotherapeutic intervention, Managing Cancer And Living Meaningfully (CALM), at the time of a new diagnosis and recurrence of ovarian cancer (OC).

The main questions are:

  1. Is it feasible and acceptable to implement CALM for patients with newly diagnosed or recently recurred advanced OC
  2. What are the prevalence and correlates of traumatic stress symptoms at baseline in patients with newly diagnosed or recently recurred advanced OC

Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires at baseline and at 3 and 6 months following a diagnosis or recurrence of stage III or IV OC. Participants will also be invited to participate in 3-6 sessions of CALM therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

While CALM has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing depression, death anxiety and increasing preparation for end of life among patients with advanced cancer later in the illness trajectory, its feasibility and effectiveness in addressing traumatic stress symptoms (TSS) soon after a diagnosis of advanced cancer has not previously been established. Findings of this study could inform the potential development of a larger randomized effectiveness trial. This study will involve a multi-method, single-arm, feasibility trial, approaching a total of 100 OC patients (50 newly diagnosed and 50 recently recurred) at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM). Measurements will be administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Participants who declined to participate in the intervention will be invited to share their reasons for opting out, contributing valuable insights to our records. A subset of purposefully sampled participants will also complete qualitative interviews following the completion of outcome measures at 6 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Recruiting
        • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • new diagnosis or recurrence of stage III or stage IV OC;
  • age ≥18 years
  • able to complete outcome measures and engage in CALM in English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • evidence of cognitive impairment indicated in the medical record, communicated by the OC clinic team, or determined by research staff at recruitment;
  • receiving psychological or psychiatric counseling from the Department of Supportive Care at PM at the time of recruitment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Newly Diagnosed + Recently Recurred
n = 50 patients with ovarian cancer (stage III or IV) will be enrolled in the study (25 newly diagnosed and 25 recently recurred).
Other: Managing Cancer And Living Meaningfully (CALM)
Our team has developed a brief, manualized, individual and couple-based psychotherapeutic intervention for patients living with advanced cancer and their primary caregivers called Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM). CALM is a brief supportive-expressive therapy consisting of 3-6 sessions of 30-60 minutes delivered over the course of 3-6 months. This tailored therapy is focused on the most common challenges and concerns facing individuals living with advanced cancer. These four broad content domains are: 1) symptom management and communication with healthcare providers; 2) changes in self and in relationships with close others; 3) sense of meaning and purpose in life; and 4) hopes and fears about the future and mortality. The aim is to offer patients and caregivers reflective space and a supportive environment to reflect on and process the various practical and profound aspects of their life while facing advanced illness.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire (SASRQ)
Time Frame: This questionnaire will be administered at all timepoints (baseline, 3 months and 6 months)
The SASRQ is a self-reported DSM-IV correspondent scale to measure a range of symptoms associated with Acute Stress Disorder (ASD), encompassing dissociation, trauma re-experiencing, avoidance behaviours, anxiety, hyperarousal, and functional impairment. The SASRQ consists of 30-items utilizing a 6-point scale that ranges from 0=not experienced to 4=very often experienced. Demonstrating robust psychometric properties, including strong test-retest reliability and consistent evidence of predictive, construct, discriminant, and convergent validity across varied populations, the SASRQ serves as a reliable and valid tool for assessment.
This questionnaire will be administered at all timepoints (baseline, 3 months and 6 months)
Clinical Evaluation Questionnaire (CEQ)-CALM
Time Frame: This questionnaire will be administered at 3 months and 6 months only.
The CEQ is a 7-item validated questionnaire, created by our research team to assess the perceived benefit of interactions with health care providers in domains relevant to advanced cancer.
This questionnaire will be administered at 3 months and 6 months only.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR-M-16)
Time Frame: This questionnaire will be administered at baseline.
The ECR-M-16 is a validated measure with 16-items, has been thoughtfully adapted to be less time-consuming and alleviate any potential burden for patients who may be physically unwell.
This questionnaire will be administered at baseline.
Condensed Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (CMSAS)
Time Frame: This questionnaire will be administered at all timepoints (baseline, 3 months and 6 months).
The CMSAS CMSAS stands as a straightforward and validated self-report evaluation tool, comprising 14 items. It effectively gauges various aspects such as energy level, dry mouth, appetite, weight loss, pain, nausea, drowsiness etc. These facets are organized into three subscales: physical, psychological and symptom distress.
This questionnaire will be administered at all timepoints (baseline, 3 months and 6 months).
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: This questionnaire will be administered at all timepoints (baseline, 3 months and 6 months).
The PHQ-9 is a diagnostic tool used in primary care settings to establish criteria-based diagnoses for depression. PHQ-9 is a 9-tem, self-reported questionnaire which consists of the 9 depression criteria which is highlighted within the DSM-IV. PHQ-9 is particularly favoured due to its concise structure, which efficiently identifies the presence of depressive disorders and is also able to rate the severity of depressive symptoms.
This questionnaire will be administered at all timepoints (baseline, 3 months and 6 months).
Death and Dying Distress Scale (DADDS)
Time Frame: This questionnaire will be administered at all timepoints (baseline, 3 months and 6 months).
The DADDS is a tool used to evaluate the distress caused by a patients thoughts on death and dying over the previous two weeks. DADDS is a 15-items questionnaire with the aims of alleviating the fear of death and fostering psychological development (Nissim et al., 2011; Shapiro et al., 2021).The validity of DADDS has been rigorously established, with factor analysis demonstrating distress related to two factors: Finitude and Dying.
This questionnaire will be administered at all timepoints (baseline, 3 months and 6 months).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Health Network, Toronto

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gary M Rodin, MD, University Health Network, Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 23-5885

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trials on Managing Cancer And Living Meaningfully (CALM)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings