High Flow Nasal Oxygen for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in the Emergency Room (GLAMOUR)
High Flow Nasal Oxygen for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in the Emergency Room: the GLAMOUR Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Francesco Franceschi, MD
- Phone Number: +390630156627
- Email: francesco.franceschi@policlinicogemelli.it
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Gianluca Tullo, MD
- Phone Number: +393926595850
- Email: gianlucatullo@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio between 250 and 150 mmHg or SpO2/FiO2 ratio between 190 and 274, after at least 15 minutes of spontaneous breathing through a Venturi mask (VM), with a FiO2 targeted at a SpO2 94-97%;
- Respiratory rate(RR)≤35breaths/min,afteratleast15minutesofspontaneous breathing through a VM, with a FiO2 targeted at a SpO2 94-97%;
- PaCO2 ≤ 45 mmHg;
- Unilateral or bilateral infiltrate(s), as detected with chest radiography and/or computed tomography and/or with lung ultrasound not fully explained by effusions, atelectasis, or nodules/masses. Infiltrates at lung ultrasound are defined as presence of focal B-lines, consolidations (with irregular marginal contour, air bronchogram, air trapping sign) and irregularity of the pleural line.
Exclusion Criteria:
Respiratory failure due to:
- Acute asthma or COPD exacerbation,
- Cardiac failure or fluid overload as primary cause of respiratory failure;
- Unstable angina or ongoing acute myocardial infarction;
- Acute respiratory acidosis with pH < 7.35 and PaCO2 > 45 mmHg;
- Hemodynamic instability and/or use of vasopressors/inotropes;
- Altered mental status (Kelly >3), see Figure 1;(18)
- Contraindications to NIV (high risk of aspiration pneumonia, impaired airways protection, head-facial trauma and/or burns, uncooperative patient, cranial/thoracic/abdominal open wounds);
- Indications to urgent intubation performed according to the clinician in charge;
- Body Mass Index > 35 kg/m2;
- Pregnancy;
- Patient's refusal to participate.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: high flow nasal oxygen
|
humidified and heated oxygen
|
|
Active Comparator: standard oxygen
|
oxygen delivery through Venturi mask
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Early deterioration
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
occurrence of any of the following from randomization: respiratory worsening; respiratory acidosis; severe respiratory distress; start of non-invasive ventilation; necessity of endotracheal intubation; development of shock; death.
|
24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Development of respiratory acidosis
Time Frame: 2, 12 and 24 hours
|
arterial pH
|
2, 12 and 24 hours
|
|
Development of hypercapnia
Time Frame: 2, 12 and 24 hours
|
arterial pCO2
|
2, 12 and 24 hours
|
|
Worsening hypoxemia
Time Frame: 2, 12 and 24 hours
|
P/F ratio
|
2, 12 and 24 hours
|
|
Worsening respiratory distress
Time Frame: 2, 12 and 24 hours
|
respiratory frequency
|
2, 12 and 24 hours
|
|
duration of any type of ventilatory support
Time Frame: 90 days
|
hours of ventilatory support
|
90 days
|
|
rate of ICU admission
Time Frame: 90 days
|
number of patients admitted to ICU
|
90 days
|
|
hospital length-of-stay
Time Frame: 30 days
|
duration of hospitalization
|
30 days
|
|
in-hospital mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
|
death during hospitalization
|
90 days
|
|
ICU length-of-stay
Time Frame: 90 days
|
duration of ICU stay
|
90 days
|
|
ICU mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
|
death in ICU
|
90 days
|
|
development of complications
Time Frame: 90 days
|
composite outcome of septic shock, nosocomial pneumonia, cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, delirium
|
90 days
|
|
level of dyspnea
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
utilizing Borg scale
|
24 hours
|
|
patient comfort
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
utilizing visual analogue scale
|
24 hours
|
|
clinical setting after ED stabilization
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
type of ward admission
|
24 hours
|
|
standard vs asymmetrical high-flow nasal cannula
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
rate of early deterioration in the treatment group will be compared between patients treated with standard or asymmetrical high-flow nasal cannula
|
24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81.
- Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans JR. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2010 Apr;55(4):408-13.
- Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10. doi: 10.1007/BF01709751. No abstract available.
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
- Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, Hess D, Hill NS, Nava S, Navalesi P Members Of The Steering Committee, Antonelli M, Brozek J, Conti G, Ferrer M, Guntupalli K, Jaber S, Keenan S, Mancebo J, Mehta S, Raoof S Members Of The Task Force. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2017 Aug 31;50(2):1602426. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02426-2016. Print 2017 Aug.
- Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, Prat G, Boulain T, Morawiec E, Cottereau A, Devaquet J, Nseir S, Razazi K, Mira JP, Argaud L, Chakarian JC, Ricard JD, Wittebole X, Chevalier S, Herbland A, Fartoukh M, Constantin JM, Tonnelier JM, Pierrot M, Mathonnet A, Beduneau G, Deletage-Metreau C, Richard JC, Brochard L, Robert R; FLORALI Study Group; REVA Network. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2185-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503326. Epub 2015 May 17.
- Demoule A, Girou E, Richard JC, Taille S, Brochard L. Benefits and risks of success or failure of noninvasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Nov;32(11):1756-65. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0324-1. Epub 2006 Sep 21.
- Antonelli M, Conti G, Esquinas A, Montini L, Maggiore SM, Bello G, Rocco M, Maviglia R, Pennisi MA, Gonzalez-Diaz G, Meduri GU. A multiple-center survey on the use in clinical practice of noninvasive ventilation as a first-line intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):18-25. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251821.44259.F3.
- Carteaux G, Millan-Guilarte T, De Prost N, Razazi K, Abid S, Thille AW, Schortgen F, Brochard L, Brun-Buisson C, Mekontso Dessap A. Failure of Noninvasive Ventilation for De Novo Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Role of Tidal Volume. Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):282-90. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001379.
- Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993 Dec 22-29;270(24):2957-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957. Erratum In: JAMA 1994 May 4;271(17):1321.
- Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Hayden DL, Schoenfeld DA, Ware LB; National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Network. Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest. 2007 Aug;132(2):410-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0617. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
- Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Madotto F, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, Bumbasirevic V, Piquilloud L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Bauer PR, Arabi YM, Ranieri M, Antonelli M, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Noninvasive Ventilation of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Insights from the LUNG SAFE Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):67-77. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201606-1306OC.
- Rochwerg B, Granton D, Wang DX, Helviz Y, Einav S, Frat JP, Mekontso-Dessap A, Schreiber A, Azoulay E, Mercat A, Demoule A, Lemiale V, Pesenti A, Riviello ED, Mauri T, Mancebo J, Brochard L, Burns K. High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
- Torres A, Sibila O, Ferrer M, Polverino E, Menendez R, Mensa J, Gabarrus A, Sellares J, Restrepo MI, Anzueto A, Niederman MS, Agusti C. Effect of corticosteroids on treatment failure among hospitalized patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high inflammatory response: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Feb 17;313(7):677-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.88.
- Crimi C, Noto A, Madotto F, Ippolito M, Nolasco S, Campisi R, De Vuono S, Fiorentino G, Pantazopoulos I, Chalkias A, Libra A, Mattei A, Scala R, Clini EM, Ergan B, Lujan M, Winck JC, Giarratano A, Carlucci A, Gregoretti C, Groff P, Cortegiani A; COVID-HIGH Investigators. High-flow nasal oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and mild hypoxaemia: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2023 Apr;78(4):354-361. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2022-218806. Epub 2022 May 17.
- O'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Earis J, Mak V. British Thoracic Society Guideline for oxygen use in adults in healthcare and emergency settings. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017 May 15;4(1):e000170. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000170. eCollection 2017. No abstract available.
- Raveling T, Vonk J, Struik FM, Goldstein R, Kerstjens HA, Wijkstra PJ, Duiverman ML. Chronic non-invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 9;8(8):CD002878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002878.pub3.
- Berbenetz N, Wang Y, Brown J, Godfrey C, Ahmad M, Vital FM, Lambiase P, Banerjee A, Bakhai A, Chong M. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 5;4(4):CD005351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005351.pub4.
- Marjanovic N, Guenezan J, Frat JP, Mimoz O, Thille AW. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure at Emergency Departments: A systematic review. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1508-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.091. Epub 2020 May 4.
- Oczkowski S, Ergan B, Bos L, Chatwin M, Ferrer M, Gregoretti C, Heunks L, Frat JP, Longhini F, Nava S, Navalesi P, Ozsancak Ugurlu A, Pisani L, Renda T, Thille AW, Winck JC, Windisch W, Tonia T, Boyd J, Sotgiu G, Scala R. ERS clinical practice guidelines: high-flow nasal cannula in acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2022 Apr 14;59(4):2101574. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01574-2021. Print 2022 Apr.
- Chidekel A, Zhu Y, Wang J, Mosko JJ, Rodriguez E, Shaffer TH. The effects of gas humidification with high-flow nasal cannula on cultured human airway epithelial cells. Pulm Med. 2012;2012:380686. doi: 10.1155/2012/380686. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
- Tinelli V, Cabrini L, Fominskiy E, Franchini S, Ferrante L, Ball L, Pelosi P, Landoni G, Zangrillo A, Secchi A. High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen vs. Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Ventilation in Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;57(3):322-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.06.033. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
- Matthay MA, Arabi Y, Arroliga AC, Bernard G, Bersten AD, Brochard LJ, Calfee CS, Combes A, Daniel BM, Ferguson ND, Gong MN, Gotts JE, Herridge MS, Laffey JG, Liu KD, Machado FR, Martin TR, McAuley DF, Mercat A, Moss M, Mularski RA, Pesenti A, Qiu H, Ramakrishnan N, Ranieri VM, Riviello ED, Rubin E, Slutsky AS, Thompson BT, Twagirumugabe T, Ware LB, Wick KD. A New Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;209(1):37-47. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202303-0558WS.
- Demi L, Wolfram F, Klersy C, De Silvestri A, Ferretti VV, Muller M, Miller D, Feletti F, Welnicki M, Buda N, Skoczylas A, Pomiecko A, Damjanovic D, Olszewski R, Kirkpatrick AW, Breitkreutz R, Mathis G, Soldati G, Smargiassi A, Inchingolo R, Perrone T. New International Guidelines and Consensus on the Use of Lung Ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Feb;42(2):309-344. doi: 10.1002/jum.16088. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
- Kelly BJ, Matthay MA. Prevalence and severity of neurologic dysfunction in critically ill patients. Influence on need for continued mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1993 Dec;104(6):1818-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.6.1818.
- Puntillo KA, White C, Morris AB, Perdue ST, Stanik-Hutt J, Thompson CL, Wild LR. Patients' perceptions and responses to procedural pain: results from Thunder Project II. Am J Crit Care. 2001 Jul;10(4):238-51.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 6697 (CTEP)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.