Positive Minds Strong Joints for Knee Osteoarthritis (PMSJ)
Physical and Mental Health Intervention for Black Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Feasibility Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Deepak Kumar, PhD,PT
- Phone Number: 617-358-3037
- Email: kumard@bu.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Hosea Boakye, MPH, PT
- Phone Number: 6173588142
- Email: hboakye@bu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Boston University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
- Age≥50
- BMI ≤ 40 kg/m2
- Self-identify as Black (including African American)
- Knee pain ≥4/10 on a 11 numeric scale over the past week
- Scored 5 or more on either the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and/or the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item Scale (GAD-7)
- Can speak and understand English at a sufficient level to understand the study procedures and informed consent
- Available for study duration
- Able to attend remote sessions
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
- Knee, hip or ankle replacement
- Intra-articular corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid knee injection within 3 months
- Knee surgery within past 6 months
- Currently receiving or received within 3-months any PT for knee OA
- Currently receiving or received within 3 months any mental health intervention (excluding pharmacologic treatments)
- Planning to initiate physical therapy for joint or low back pain in the next 3months
- Planning to initiate any mental health treatment (excluding pharmacologic treatments) in the next 1 month.
- Systemic inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
- Neurologic conditions (e.g., stroke, Parkinson's disease, etc.)
- Contraindications to starting an exercise program.
- Suspected substance abuse
- Lack capacity to consent
- Pregnancy (self-report)
- Participation in another clinical trial for any joint or muscle pain
- Planning for a major surgery in the next 6 months
- Having high risk mental health symptoms (active suicidality, bipolar disorder, mania, psychosis, schizophrenia)
- Receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy for cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Positive Minds Strong Joints
Participants will receive an individual mental health intervention and a group-based exercise intervention through a HIPPAA-Protected Zoom videoconferencing once a week for 10 weeks.
|
In this10-week physical and mental health intervention, participants will receive recommended exercise intervention and evidence-based mental health intervention for pain, depression and anxiety.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: Throughout the recruitment process
|
Number of participants enrolled out of those screened
|
Throughout the recruitment process
|
|
Retention
Time Frame: From the start of the study to end of the 10 week intervention
|
Proportion of participants who complete patient-reported outcome surveys at 10 week timepoint
|
From the start of the study to end of the 10 week intervention
|
|
Attendance
Time Frame: During 10 weeks intervention period
|
Proportion of participants that attended at least 80% of intervention sessions
|
During 10 weeks intervention period
|
|
Satisfaction with treatment
Time Frame: week 10 and week 22
|
Custom 2-item (0-10 scale) to determine satisfaction with individual components of the intervention (i.e., Positive Minds, Strong Joints).
There are 2 items and each item is scored separately.
Higher scores for each item mean greater satisfaction for that dimension.
|
week 10 and week 22
|
|
Participant Feedback
Time Frame: week 10 and week 22
|
Custom survey asking the participants to provide feedback on a 5-point scale from very poor to excellent on various aspects of the intervention including content, interventionists, group aspects, overall rating, etc.
|
week 10 and week 22
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time Frame: Baseline, week 5, week 10, week 16 and week 22
|
Patient-reported outcome for knee pain and disability; a score from 0 to 100, 0 representing extreme problems and 100 representing no problems.
|
Baseline, week 5, week 10, week 16 and week 22
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item
Time Frame: Baseline, week 5, week 10, week 16 and week 22
|
9-item questionnaire assessing depression symptoms.
Each question is scored from 0 to 3 where higher scores indicate higher frequency of experiencing depressive symptoms.
Total score is the sum of individual item scores.
Score range is 0-27.
Higher total scores indicate greater severity of depression
|
Baseline, week 5, week 10, week 16 and week 22
|
|
Generalized anxiety 7-item scale
Time Frame: Baseline, week 5, week 10, week 16 and week 22
|
It assesses anxiety symptoms.
Each question is scored from 0 to 3 and the sum value of individual questions is the total score with range form 0-21. Higher total scores indicate greater severity of anxiety
|
Baseline, week 5, week 10, week 16 and week 22
|
|
Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, week 10, and week 22
|
It measures confidence in one's capacity to function despite pain.
Scores range from 1 (very uncertain) to 10 (very certain).
It has three subscales of pain, function, and other symptoms calculated as average of items contributing to that subscale.
Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy to manage osteoarthritis.
|
Baseline, week 10, and week 22
|
|
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire - Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline and week 10
|
4-item questionnaire to determine how one's fear avoidance beliefs contributes to the cognitive/affective part of their knee pain.
Each item is scored from 0 to 6.
Total scores are summation of each item scores.
Range is 0-24.
Higher total scores indicate greater fear of physical activity
|
Baseline and week 10
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and week 10
|
Questionnaire for a person's thought and feeling about pain.
The questionnaire has 3 subscales namely rumination, magnification and helplessness.
Each question is rated on a 5-point scale, from 0 (not at all) to 4 (always).
It is scored by summing the ratings of its 13 items with a range of 0-52.
Higher scores indicate greater pain catastrophizing tendencies in response to pain.
|
Baseline and week 10
|
|
Trust in Medical Research Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and week 10
|
It assesses participants' trust in medical research.
It includes items related to confidence in researchers, and the scientific process, rated on a 5 Likert scale (strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree and strongly agree) with a total score range of 0-48.
Higher scores indicate greater trust in medical research
|
Baseline and week 10
|
|
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Time Frame: Baseline and week 10
|
It measures perceived social support from family, friends, and significant others.
It consists of 12 items rated on a 7- Likert scale for a total score range from 12-84.
Higher scores indicate greater perceived social support across various domains.
|
Baseline and week 10
|
|
International Physical Activity Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, week 10, week 22
|
It assesses physical activity levels across diverse populations.
The responses are converted into MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) minutes per week.
The results can be continuous or categorized.
For the categorized results, individuals' physical activity categorized as low, moderate and high
|
Baseline, week 10, week 22
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-sleep
Time Frame: Baseline, week 10
|
It is used to measure measures perceived sleep quality, difficulty in sleep and having enough and refreshing sleep.
The 8 questions are rated on a 5-point scale.
The scores are summed together with a raw score of from 8 to 40.
The raw scores are then converted to standardized T-scores using conversion tables.
|
Baseline, week 10
|
|
Patient Global Rating of Change
Time Frame: Week 10, Week 22
|
This is a single item questionnaire with 15 options ranging from a very great deal worse to a very great deal better.
|
Week 10, Week 22
|
|
Numerical Rating Scale-nominated activity
Time Frame: Weekly from start of intervention to week 22
|
average rating of knee pain from 0-10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable, in the past week in a nominated activity selected at baseline
|
Weekly from start of intervention to week 22
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Osteoarthritis
Time Frame: Weekly start of intervention to week 22
|
It assesses participant's assessment of impact of osteoarthritis on their general health on a 0-100 scale.
0 is very poor and 100 is very well.
|
Weekly start of intervention to week 22
|
|
Adherence to exercise
Time Frame: Weekly from start of intervention to week 22
|
This questionnaire is used to assess participants adhere to exercise.
Participants document their engagement in unsupervised exercise throughout the week by noting minutes of exercise per day of the week
|
Weekly from start of intervention to week 22
|
|
gait speed
Time Frame: Baseline and week 10
|
A known distance of20-28 meters divided by time taken to walk this distance in m/s
|
Baseline and week 10
|
|
Physical Activity Stages of change (short form)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 10
|
It assesses participants readiness to engage physical activity.
It consists of five stages which include Precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action and maintenance.
|
Baseline and week 10
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Deepak Kumar, PhD,PT, Boston University Charles River Campus
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Jordan JM, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Luta G, Dragomir AD, Woodard J, Fang F, Schwartz TA, Abbate LM, Callahan LF, Kalsbeek WD, Hochberg MC. Prevalence of knee symptoms and radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. J Rheumatol. 2007 Jan;34(1):172-80.
- Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, Arden NK, Bennell K, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Kraus VB, Lohmander LS, Abbott JH, Bhandari M, Blanco FJ, Espinosa R, Haugen IK, Lin J, Mandl LA, Moilanen E, Nakamura N, Snyder-Mackler L, Trojian T, Underwood M, McAlindon TE. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Nov;27(11):1578-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
- Dillon CF, Rasch EK, Gu Q, Hirsch R. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the United States: arthritis data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1991-94. J Rheumatol. 2006 Nov;33(11):2271-9. Epub 2006 Oct 1.
- Iversen MD, Schwartz TA, von Heideken J, Callahan LF, Golightly YM, Goode A, Hill C, Huffman K, Pathak A, Cooke J, Allen KD. Sociodemographic and Clinical Correlates of Physical Therapy Utilization in Adults With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. 2018 Aug 1;98(8):670-678. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy052.
- Jimenez DE, Cook B, Bartels SJ, Alegria M. Disparities in mental health service use of racial and ethnic minority elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jan;61(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12063. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
- McClendon J, Essien UR, Youk A, Ibrahim SA, Vina E, Kwoh CK, Hausmann LRM. Cumulative Disadvantage and Disparities in Depression and Pain Among Veterans With Osteoarthritis: The Role of Perceived Discrimination. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jan;73(1):11-17. doi: 10.1002/acr.24481.
- Vaughn IA, Terry EL, Bartley EJ, Schaefer N, Fillingim RB. Racial-Ethnic Differences in Osteoarthritis Pain and Disability: A Meta-Analysis. J Pain. 2019 Jun;20(6):629-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
- Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, Oatis C, Guyatt G, Block J, Callahan L, Copenhaver C, Dodge C, Felson D, Gellar K, Harvey WF, Hawker G, Herzig E, Kwoh CK, Nelson AE, Samuels J, Scanzello C, White D, Wise B, Altman RD, DiRenzo D, Fontanarosa J, Giradi G, Ishimori M, Misra D, Shah AA, Shmagel AK, Thoma LM, Turgunbaev M, Turner AS, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):220-233. doi: 10.1002/art.41142. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Mental Disorders
- Arthritis
- Joint Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Behavioral Symptoms
- Osteoarthritis
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Behavior
- Signs and Symptoms
- Anxiety Disorders
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Chronic Pain
- Depression
- Motor Activity
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 7517
- 9550306371 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Rheumatology Research Foundation)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.