COgnitive-somatoSensory-MOtor Training to Improve Arm and Hand Function After Stroke (iCOSMO) (iCOSMO)
Comparing the Effect of a Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Home-based Exercise Programme With COgnitive-somatoSensory-MOtor Training to Improve Arm and Hand Function After Stroke (iCOSMO)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Urvashy Gopaul, PhD
- Phone Number: 7996 416-597-3422
- Email: urvashy.gopaul@uhn.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Olga Yaroslavtseva, BSc
- Phone Number: 7858 416-597-3422
- Email: olga.yaroslavtseva@uhn.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G2A1
- Recruiting
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
-
Contact:
- Urvashy Gopaul, PhD
- Phone Number: 7996 416-597-3422
- Email: urvashy.gopaul@uhn.ca
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Urvashy Gopaul, PhD
-
Contact:
- Olga Yaroslavtseva, BSc
- Phone Number: 416-597-3422
- Email: olga.yaroslavtseva@uhn.ca
-
Principal Investigator:
- Mark U Bayley, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of stroke
- Must be more than 6 months post-stroke
- Must be above 18 years old
- Must have some motor and/or somatosensory deficits in the upper limbs
Exclusion Criteria:
- A prior history of central nervous system dysfunction other than stroke
- Upper limb deficits resulting from non-stroke pathology
- Inability to cooperate, follow instructions or provide consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: iCOSMO
20 participants will receive the iCOSMO intervention.
iCOSMO consists of two training approaches that will include active touch and movement exploratory procedures during goal-oriented tasks as well as robotic training using the Kinarm Exoskeleton device.
|
The first training approach of iCOSMO will focus on integrated somatosensory-motor variables during reaching and object manipulation (60 minutes).
The second training approach will focus on proprioceptive, motor and cognitive tasks using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton (60 minutes).
iCOSMO will be delivered 3 times per week (2 hours per session) for 6 weeks (Total: 36 hours of treatment).
|
|
Active Comparator: Home GRASP
20 participants will receive the control intervention.
The control group will receive a matched dose of a home-based exercise programme.
The home-based exercise programme will be based on the Home Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program.
|
The home-based exercise programme will be based on the Home Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program focusing on stretching, arm strengthening, hand strengthening, coordination and hand skills.
The Home Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program will be delivered 2 hours/session, 3 times/week, for 6 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fidelity
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
|
Measures of fidelity will monitor intervention delivery such as the number of intervention sessions attended and the amount of practice.
|
Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
|
|
Kinarm standard tasks- the Reverse Visually Guided Reaching
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The Kinarm standard tasks™ will include the Reverse Visually Guided Reaching.
The Reverse Visually Guided Reaching task assesses attention, inhibitory control and cognitive control of visuomotor skills.
A task score will be reported as a measure of a participant's performance against healthy populations.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Kinarm standard tasks- the Trail Making A&B
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The Kinarm standard tasks™ will include the Trail Making A&B.
The Trail Making tests evaluate task switching abilities.
There are 2 parts of this test.
Trail A: trace a sequence of targets numbered 1 to 25; Trail B: Trace alternating numeric-alpha sequence of targets 1-A-2-B etc.
A task score will be reported as a measure of a participant's performance against healthy populations.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Kinarm standard tasks- the Object Hit and Avoid
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The Kinarm standard tasks™ will include the Object Hit and Avoid.
The Object Hit and Avoid task assesses spatial attention, rapid motor selection and inhibition control.
A task score will be reported as a measure of a participant's performance against healthy populations.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Kinarm standard tasks- the Spatial Span Task
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The Kinarm standard tasks™ will include the Spatial Span Task.
The Spatial Span test evaluates visuospatial working memory.
A task score will be reported as a measure of a participant's performance against healthy populations.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Kinarm standard tasks- the Paired Associates Learning
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The Kinarm standard tasks™ will include the Paired Associates Learning.
The Paired Associates Learning task evaluates visuospatial working memory by testing the ability to associate patterns with spatial locations and recall them after a delay.
A task score will be reported as a measure of a participant's performance against healthy populations.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Kinarm standard tasks- the Visually Guided Reaching
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The Kinarm standard tasks™ will include the Visually Guided Reaching.
The Visually Guided Reaching task measures the subject's visuomotor capabilities and multi-joint coordination.
A task score will reported as a measure of a participant's performance against healthy populations.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Kinarm standard tasks- the Object Hit
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The Kinarm standard tasks™ will include the Object Hit.
The Object Hit task is a rapid sensorimotor decision and control test.
A task score will be reported as a measure of a participant's performance against healthy populations.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Kinarm standard tasks- the Ball-on-Bar
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The Kinarm standard tasks™ will include the Ball-on-Bar.
The Ball on Bar task assesses bimanual coordination and visuomotor skills.
A task score will reported as a measure of a participant's performance against healthy populations.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Kinarm standard tasks- the Arm Posture Perturbation
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The Kinarm standard tasks™ will include the Arm Posture Perturbation.
The Arm Posture Perturbation task assesses the responsiveness to unexpected disturbances to the arm.
A task score will reported as a measure of a participant's performance against healthy populations.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Kinarm standard tasks- the Arm Positioning Matching
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The Kinarm standard tasks™ will include the Arm Positioning Matching: The Arm Position Matching task measures of a subject's proprioceptive capabilities in the upper limb.
A task score will be reported as a measure of a participant's performance against healthy populations.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Kinarm standard tasks- the Arm Movement Matching
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The Kinarm standard tasks™ will include the Arm Movement Matching: The Arm Movement Matching task assesses the ability of a subject to perceive limb motion or kinesthesia in a workspace.
A task score will be reported as a measure of a participant's performance against healthy populations.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
FMA-UE provides quantitative measures of sensory and motor impairments in the upper limbs and is scored from 0-66.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The ARAT assesses motor performance of the upper limb.
It consists of 19 tasks across the 4 subscales (grasp, grip, pinch, gross movement).
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Grip dynamometry
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
Maximum voluntary grip strength with the Jamar dynamometer will be used as a conventional measure of muscle strength in the upper limb post-stroke.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Pinch strength
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
Pulp-to-pulp pinch strength will be assessed using a pinch gauge (B & L Engineering).
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
|
Box and Block Test (BBT)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
The BBT will be used to assess gross manual dexterity.
|
Baseline, immediately after intervention,1-month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Stanford Fatigue Visual Analogue Scale (SFVAS)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
|
The SFVAS, a single-item scale with a rating of 1 (no fatigue) to 10 (severe fatigue), will be used to assess the presence and extent of mental and physical fatigue.
|
Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
|
|
Pain visual analogue scale (PVAS)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
|
PVAS is a single-item scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (excruciating pain).
|
Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mark Bayley, MD, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Birkenmeier RL, Prager EM, Lang CE. Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Sep;24(7):620-35. doi: 10.1177/1545968310361957. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
- Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985 Jun;39(6):386-91. doi: 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386.
- Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983 Oct;63(10):1606-10. doi: 10.1093/ptj/63.10.1606.
- Gopaul U, van Vliet P, Callister R, Nilsson M, Carey L. COMbined Physical and somatoSEnsory training after stroke: Development and description of a novel intervention to improve upper limb function. Physiother Res Int. 2019 Jan;24(1):e1748. doi: 10.1002/pri.1748. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
- Ritter PL, Gonzalez VM, Laurent DD, Lorig KR. Measurement of pain using the visual numeric scale. J Rheumatol. 2006 Mar;33(3):574-80.
- Bourke TC, Lowrey CR, Dukelow SP, Bagg SD, Norman KE, Scott SH. A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Oct 10;13(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0201-2.
- Ekstrand E, Lexell J, Brogardh C. Grip strength is a representative measure of muscle weakness in the upper extremity after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Dec;23(6):400-405. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1168591. Epub 2016 May 4.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 22-5628
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.