Dysferlinopathy Protein in Peripheral Blood Monocytes.

July 11, 2024 updated by: Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Cross-sectional Study to Evaluate the Frequency of Dysferlinopathy Carriers in the Caucasian Population Using a Test for Detecting the Dysferlin Protein in Peripheral Blood Monocytes.

The objective of the study is to answer the following important questions. Deficiency of the dysferlin protein is the cause of a very rare limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD-2B) that leads to significant disability. This disease is caused by mutations in the dysferlin gene. It is a recessive inherited disease, meaning that both copies of the gene must have mutations for the disease to develop. This study aims to analyze the frequency of carriers of a mutation in the DYSF gene in the Caucasian population. To achieve this, The investigator analyzed the blood of 100 healthy volunteers from their local area, quantifying the dysferlin protein in peripheral blood monocytes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
149

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Cataluña
      • Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain, 08041
        • Eduard Gallardo Vigo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study focuses on individuals with dysferlinopathies, a heterogeneous group of autosomal recessive muscular dystrophies caused by mutations in the DYSF gene. It examines the effect of vitamin D3 treatment on dysferlin expression in vitro using HL60 cells, monocytes, and myotubes from controls and carriers of a single DYSF mutation. Additionally, an observational study with oral vitamin D3 in a cohort of 21 carriers demonstrates a significant increase in dysferlin expression in treated monocytes compared to untreated carriers. These findings suggest significant therapeutic implications, emphasizing the potential of combining molecular strategies with vitamin D3 supplementation to elevate dysferlin expression to non-pathological levels.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals diagnosed with dysferlinopathies.
  • Carriers of a single mutation in the DYSF gene.
  • Participants who are willing to undergo treatment with oral vitamin D3.
  • Subjects who can provide informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Controls and carriers willing to participate in in vitro studies using HL60 cells, monocytes, and myotubes.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with conditions or medications that could interfere with the study outcomes of dysferlin expression.
  • Participants who are unwilling or unable to adhere to the study protocol for the duration of the study period.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Individuals with known allergies or adverse reactions to vitamin D3 supplements.
  • Subjects with severe concurrent illnesses that may impact the study's objectives or their ability to participate effectively.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dysferlin Expression Levels by age and gender
Time Frame: 1 month
Dysferlin expresion lels in monocytes by western blotting
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of Carries by Protein Level
Time Frame: 1 month
Identification of Carries by Protein Level
1 month
Percentage of Predicted Carriers Showing Specific Genetic Mutations
Time Frame: 1 month
Mutation Analysis of Predicted Carriers
1 month
Percentage of DNA Methylation in Target Gene
Time Frame: 1 month
DNA Methylation status of the DYSF locus in order to determine wether the reduced DYSF levels in carrier and disease range had an underlying epigenetic mechanism.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 27, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 17, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IIBSP-MON-2011-157

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings