Bioactive Microstructured Anti Microbial Precoated Surface Implant Versus Non-coated Surface Implant in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in the Mandible
Bioactive Microstructured Anti Microbial Precoated Surface Implant Versus Non-coated Surface Implant in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in the Mandible (Controlled Clinical Trial)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Alexandria, Egypt
- Alexandria Faculty of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adequate interproximal space.
- Adequate interocclusal space.
- Adequate anatomical location, accessibility, and visualization for easy surgical implant placement.
- Both genders.
- Controlled medical condition
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of parafunctional dependency as bruxism.
- Adjacent pathosis near the implant site.
- Patient under radiotherapy targeting the head and neck.
- Heavy smokers.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Pre coated surface implants
|
Pre coated impants with microstructured bioactive antimicrobial coating with double threading for higher bone-to-implant contact and faster bone gathering on the surface.
|
|
Active Comparator: Non coated surface implants
|
Non-coated implant with double threading for higher bone-to-implant contact and faster bone gathering on the surface.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
change in implant stability
Time Frame: up to 4 months
|
implant stability will be assessed using Osstell device
|
up to 4 months
|
|
change in pain intensity
Time Frame: 1st,3rd, and 7th days
|
pain was assessed using visual analogue scale that ranges from 0 (No pain) to 10 (untolerated pain)
|
1st,3rd, and 7th days
|
|
Wound Healing score
Time Frame: 1st,3rd, and 7th days,14th day
|
Landry healing index was used;
|
1st,3rd, and 7th days,14th day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post operative complications
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Occurence of infection was assessed
|
6 months
|
|
Change in bone density
Time Frame: up to 4 months
|
CBCT was used to measure bone density
|
up to 4 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0375-01/2020
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.