Bioactive Microstructured Anti Microbial Precoated Surface Implant Versus Non-coated Surface Implant in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in the Mandible

July 25, 2024 updated by: Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

Bioactive Microstructured Anti Microbial Precoated Surface Implant Versus Non-coated Surface Implant in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in the Mandible (Controlled Clinical Trial)

Dental implant's surface properties significantly influence both biological and mechanical integration. Surface bio-treatment could accelerate and enhance bone regeneration, ensuring successful implantation. therefore, this study compares bone densification, primary and secondary stability, wound healing, and pain intensity between pre-coated antimicrobial surfaces of dental implants versus non-coated surfaces in controlled type 2 diabetic patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Alexandria Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adequate interproximal space.
  • Adequate interocclusal space.
  • Adequate anatomical location, accessibility, and visualization for easy surgical implant placement.
  • Both genders.
  • Controlled medical condition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of parafunctional dependency as bruxism.
  • Adjacent pathosis near the implant site.
  • Patient under radiotherapy targeting the head and neck.
  • Heavy smokers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pre coated surface implants
Pre coated impants with microstructured bioactive antimicrobial coating with double threading for higher bone-to-implant contact and faster bone gathering on the surface.
Active Comparator: Non coated surface implants
Non-coated implant with double threading for higher bone-to-implant contact and faster bone gathering on the surface.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in implant stability
Time Frame: up to 4 months
implant stability will be assessed using Osstell device
up to 4 months
change in pain intensity
Time Frame: 1st,3rd, and 7th days
pain was assessed using visual analogue scale that ranges from 0 (No pain) to 10 (untolerated pain)
1st,3rd, and 7th days
Wound Healing score
Time Frame: 1st,3rd, and 7th days,14th day

Landry healing index was used;

  1. Very poor Tissue color: ≥50% of gingiva red, Response to palpation: Bleeding, Granulation tissue:Present, Incision margin: Not epithelialized, with loss ofepithelium beyond incision margin, Suppuration: Present
  2. Poor Tissue color: ≥50% of gingiva red, Response to palpation: Bleeding, Granulation tissue: Present, Incision margin: Not epithelialized, with connective tissue exposed
  3. Good Tissue colour: ≥25% and<50% of gingiva red, Response to palpation: No bleeding, Granulation tissue: None, Incision margin: No connective tissue exposed
  4. Very good Tissue colour: <25% of gingiva red, Response to palpation: No bleeding, Granulation tissue: None, Incision margin: No connective tissue exposed
  5. Excellent Tissue color: All tissues pink, Response to palpation: No bleeding, Granulation tissue: None, Incision margin: No connective tissue expose
1st,3rd, and 7th days,14th day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post operative complications
Time Frame: 6 months
Occurence of infection was assessed
6 months
Change in bone density
Time Frame: up to 4 months
CBCT was used to measure bone density
up to 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 26, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 12, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 12, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on Pre coated impants

Subscribe