UNMET CARE PERCEPTIONS OF INTENSIVE CARE NURSES
UNMET NURSING CARE PERCEPTIONS OF INTENSIVE CARE NURSES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Atakum
-
Samsun, Atakum, Turkey, 55100
- Ondokuz Mayıs University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- working in intensive care
- volunteering to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- not volunteering to participate in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
What is the perception of care among intensive care nurses?
Time Frame: April-September 2023
|
This study is a qualitative design study conducted with intensive care nurses.
In the study, a purposeful sampling method was used in accordance with the qualitative research approach.
The number of participants was determined according to data saturation and was based on the voluntary participation of a total of 20 intensive care nurses.
During the interview, participants were asked to fill out a personal information form and expert opinions on the subject, as well as in-depth interview questions in a semi-structured information form consisting of eight questions.
Data were collected through face-to-face individual interviews with nurses working in the intensive care unit of a Training and Research Hospital between April and September 2023.
In-depth interview questions were prepared in line with literature knowledge and expert opinions were obtained.
|
April-September 2023
|
|
What are the thoughts of intensive care nurses regarding the perception of unmet care?
Time Frame: April-September 2023
|
After the interviews were completed, the raw data were manually transcribed by the researchers.
The content analysis method was used in the evaluation of the data.
The data were read several times by the researchers and codes were created from each word, sentence and paragraph.
The analysis of the data was carried out manually using the level coding system and themes were created.
Level coding was applied as open coding (first level), selective coding (second level), themes (third level) (Yıldırım & Şimşek 2016).
After this stage, the relevant codes were classified and themes and sub-themes were created (Elo & Kyngäs, 2008; Vaismoradi et al., 2013).
|
April-September 2023
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UNMET NURSING CARE PERCEPTIONS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.