Irinotecan Liposomes Combined with Cetuximab + Vermofenib in First-line Failure of Advanced Colorectal Cancer (VICPROIRI)

February 26, 2025 updated by: Li Wenhua, Fudan University

Phase II Exploratory Study of Irinotecan Liposomes Combined with Cetuximab + Vermofenib in First-line Failure of Advanced RAS Wild /BRAF Mutated Colorectal Cancer

Efficacy and safety of irinotecan liposomes combined with cetuximab + vermofenib in first-line failure of advanced RAS wild /BRAF mutated colorectal cancer, Exploratory analysis of biomarkers (including but not limited to ctDNA, immune microenvironment indicators, tumor mutation load, lymphocyte subsets, cytokines, gut microbes, and others) in relation to efficacy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study aims to explore the following key questions: 1) whether replacing ordinary irinotecan in VIC protocol with irinotecan liposomes can improve the safety and efficacy of BRAF V600E mutation in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer; 2) To provide a reference for identifying the dominant population for the benefit of irinotecan liposomes through the exploration of a range of biomarkers (including but not limited to ctDNA, immune microenvironmental indicators, tumor mutation load, lymphocyte subsets, cytokines, gut microbes, and others). Thus, it provides more treatment options for BRAF V600E mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Recruiting
        • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 18 years of age;
  • Colorectal adenocarcinoma was confirmed by histological or cytopathological examination, and RAS wild /BRAF V600E mutation was detected by PCR or NGS;
  • Failure or intolerance of standard first-line treatment. First-line regimens including oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil in patients with MSS; For BRAF V600E mutated patients with MSI-H, first-line immunotherapy with PD-1 or PD-L1 is required;
  • At least one measurable lesion according to RECIST v1.1;
  • ECOG score is 0~2;
  • Good bone marrow and organ function: ① Neutrophils (ANC) ≥1.5×109/L, platelets (PLT) ≥100×109/L, hemoglobin (Hb) ≥90g/L, white blood cells (WBC) ≥3.0×109/L, albumin (ALB) ≥32 g/L, and no bleeding tendency; ② AST, ALT and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were all ≤2.5× upper limit of normal range (ULN), and ≤5×ULN when liver metastases occurred; Total bilirubin ≤1.5×ULN; Serum creatinine (Cr) ≤1.5×ULN or creatinine clearance ≥60 ml/min (calculated according to Cockroft-Gault);
  • Expected survival ≥3 months;
  • Can understand the situation of this study, patients and (or) legal representatives voluntarily agree to participate in this study and sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have previously received BRAF inhibitors or irinotecan liposomes;
  • Proven allergic to the test drug and/or its excipients;
  • symptomatic, untreated brain metastases or meningeal metastases that fail to achieve clinical stability;
  • Acute or subacute intestinal obstruction or chronic inflammatory bowel disease;
  • have had other malignant tumors within the past 5 years or currently, except for cured cervical carcinoma in situ, uterine carcinoma in situ and non-melanoma skin cancer;
  • Pregnant or lactating female patients, patients of childbearing age who refuse to accept contraceptive measures;
  • Patients considered by the investigator to be unsuitable for this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Irinotecan liposome gourp
Irinotecan liposomes combined with cetuximab + vermofenib
Drug: Irinotecan liposomes combined with cetuximab + vermofenib
Vermofenil 960mg orally twice daily; Irinotecan liposomes, 70mg/m2, d1, 90 min intravenously, Q2W; Cetuximab 500mg/m2, d1, Q2W;
Other Names:
  • Irinotecan liposomes+VC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response rate
Time Frame: The evaluation period was up to 24 months from the date the participant entered the clinical study and started the medication
The proportion of patients with optimal tumor response, complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed based on the RECIST v1.1 criteria
The evaluation period was up to 24 months from the date the participant entered the clinical study and started the medication

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival
Time Frame: The evaluation period was up to 24 months from the date of the subject's first medication to the date of first recorded progress or the date of death from any cause, whichever came first
The time from the start of treatment to the first recording of PD or death, whichever occurs first
The evaluation period was up to 24 months from the date of the subject's first medication to the date of first recorded progress or the date of death from any cause, whichever came first
Overall survival
Time Frame: The evaluation period was up to 24 months from the date of the subject's first medication to the date of death from any cause
The time between the start of treatment and the first recorded death
The evaluation period was up to 24 months from the date of the subject's first medication to the date of death from any cause
Adverse event
Time Frame: Incidence and severity of adverse events in treatment regimens up to 24 months
Incidence and severity of adverse events in treatment regimens
Incidence and severity of adverse events in treatment regimens up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fudan University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Wenhua Li, Ph.D, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 26, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FudanU.2411307-18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

After the research is completed, it is decided to share according to the research results

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings