Introduction of Mycotic Prophylaxis At Cystectomy Trial. (IMPACT)
IMPACT - the Introduction of Mycotic Prophylaxis At Cystectomy Trial. Perioperative Mycotic Prophylaxis to Reduce Postoperative Complications Following Cystectomy - a Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cystectomy with construction of a urinary diversion, is a major cancer surgery and one of the most complex surgeries in the urological specialty. After cystectomy, the most commonly performed urinary diversion is an ileal conduit, where a section of the terminal ileum is shunted out and connected to the upper urinary tract and a stoma is created. During this procedure, the abdominal cavity is exposed to bacteria and fungus from the ileum. Besides the perioperative contamination, micro-leakage in relation to the anastomosis is suspected to contribute to a local infectious response that may result in postoperative complications as ileal paralysis. Paralytic ileus is a serious complication that affects many patients after cystectomy, resulting in a prolonged length of stay, low quality of life postoperatively, and increased risk of complications such as aspiration, pneumonia, wound rupture, deep venous thrombosis, undernourishment and infections.
Current guidelines support the use of perioperative antibiotics targeting gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, typically administered as broad-spectrum medicine such as piperacillin/tazobactam or cephalosporins. Regarding fungal infections, emerging data show that 48% of the patients undergoing RC have candida albicans in samples from the terminal ileum. Also, it is well known that fungal infections are highly prevalent in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery where it is associated with a high risk of mortality.
Small retrospective studies suggest that the addition of antifungal medicine to perioperative antibiotics can reduce the risk of bowel- and infectious complications after abdominal surgery.
The compelling theoretical and clinical rationale for addition of antifungal prophylaxis to standard-of-care antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing radical cystectomy provides the basis for initiation of a randomized clinical trial representing the highest level of evidence.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Mie Ynddal, MD
- Phone Number: +4535456152
- Email: mie.skjoettgaard.ynddal@regionh.dk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
- Recruiting
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet
-
Contact:
- Adreas Røder, MD, PhD, Professor
- Phone Number: +4535458789
- Email: andreas.roeder@regionh.dk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients 18 years and older
- Willingness to participate in the study and the ability to understand and sign an informed consent
- Indication for performing cystectomy
- The urinary diversion is limited to the ileal conduit
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with contraindications to Fluconazole. This includes allergies and treatment with non-pausable medication that in combination is contraindicated
- Patients in active treatment for mycotic infections
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Fluconazole
Intravenous Fluconazole 400 mg single dose in 200 ml saline solution
|
400 mg inravenous Fluconazole, single dose 200 ml
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Isotonic saline solution
Intravenous saline solution single dose 200 ml
|
Intravenous saline solution, single dose 200 ml
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: 90 days from surgery
|
Measured by Clavien Dindo III-V classification score.
The Clavien Dindo Classification is used to rank the severity of a surgical complication.
It consists of seven grades (I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb, V) with I being any deviation from the normal postoperative course and V being death of a patient.
|
90 days from surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Days Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH)
Time Frame: 90 days from surgery
|
Number of days alive and out of hospital within 90 days from surgery
|
90 days from surgery
|
|
Readmission rate
Time Frame: 90 days after surgery
|
Number of readmissions
|
90 days after surgery
|
|
Time to gastrointestinal function
Time Frame: Postoperatively within 90 days
|
First bowel movement
|
Postoperatively within 90 days
|
|
Nasogastric tube placement
Time Frame: Postoperatively within 90 days
|
Number of nasogastric tube placements
|
Postoperatively within 90 days
|
|
Length of stay (LOS)
Time Frame: 90 days from surgery
|
Duration (days) of primary hospitalization.
|
90 days from surgery
|
|
Quality of life (QoL): EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Before operation and 90 days after surgery
|
Questionnaire from EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100.
The questionnaires consists of a global health status (high score represents high quality of life), a functional scale (a high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning) and a symptom scale (a high score represents a high level of symptomatology/problems).
|
Before operation and 90 days after surgery
|
|
Quality of Life(QOL): EORTC QLQ-BLM30
Time Frame: Before operation and 90 days after
|
Questionnaire from EORTC: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100.
The questionnaires consists of a global health status (high score represents high quality of life), a functional scale (a high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning) and a symptom scale (a high score represents a high level of symptomatology/problems).
|
Before operation and 90 days after
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andreas Røder, MD, PhD, Professor, Urological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Principal Investigator: Ulla N Joensen, MD, PhD, Urological Research Unit, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
- Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):139-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139.
- Lightner DJ, Wymer K, Sanchez J, Kavoussi L. Best Practice Statement on Urologic Procedures and Antimicrobial Prophylaxis. J Urol. 2020 Feb;203(2):351-356. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000509. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
- Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Biyani CS, Bjerggaard Jensen J, Roupret M, Truss M. Validation of the Clavien-Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel. Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):608-613. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
- Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Roupret M, Truss M; European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.033. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
- Maibom SL, Roder MA, Poulsen AM, Thind PO, Salling ML, Salling LN, Kehlet H, Brasso K, Joensen UN. Morbidity and Days Alive and Out of Hospital Within 90 Days Following Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Apr 19;28:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.03.010. eCollection 2021 Jun.
- Andrijasevic N, Ovcaricek S, Butic I, Navratil M, Mili B. Comparison of the effectiveness of two combinations of antibiotic used for perioperative prophylactic therapy during radical cystectomy: A retrospective cohort study. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 Nov;16(11):E539-E544. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7859.
- Villmones HC, Halland A, Stenstad T, Ulvestad E, Weedon-Fekjaer H, Kommedal O. The cultivable microbiota of the human distal ileum. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jun;27(6):912.e7-912.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
- Prunty M, Rhodes S, Rivero MJ, Callegari M, Jesse E, Arenas-Gallo C, Brant A, Calaway A, Scherr D, Shoag JE. National Adherence to Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy. J Urol. 2023 Feb;209(2):329-336. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003069. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
- Maibom SL, Roder MA, Aasvang EK, Rohrsted M, Thind PO, Bagi P, Kistorp T, Poulsen AM, Salling LN, Kehlet H, Brasso K, Joensen UN. Open vs robot-assisted radical cystectomy (BORARC): a double-blinded, randomised feasibility study. BJU Int. 2022 Jul;130(1):102-113. doi: 10.1111/bju.15619. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Antifungal Agents
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors
- Hormone Antagonists
- Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors
- Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 Inhibitors
- 14-alpha Demethylase Inhibitors
- Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 Inhibitors
- Fluconazole
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023-506226-36-00
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cystectomy
-
NCT07537127RecruitingMyomectomy | Cystectomy
-
NCT06783855Recruiting
-
NCT00577785Completed
-
NCT03265470CompletedRadical Cystectomy
-
NCT00966147UnknownHemodynamic Monitoring | Radical Cystectomy | Perioperative Complications
-
NCT03410186Completed
-
NCT00393601CompletedLaparoscopic Radical Cystectomy
-
NCT03500744TerminatedHysterectomy | Regional Anesthesia | Cystectomy
-
NCT06422182CompletedErector Spinae Plane Block | Radical Cystectomy
Clinical Trials on Fluconazole
-
NCT07557966CompletedEfficacy | Treatment | Safety | Fungal Keratitis | Fluconazole | Intrastromal Injection
-
NCT07295314Not yet recruitingGut Microbiome | Healthy Adult Male | Antifungal Therapy
-
NCT07396857Recruiting
-
NCT07341672Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07342153RecruitingDermatophytosis | Tinea Corporis
-
NCT03945448RecruitingCryptococcal Meningitis
-
NCT04930107Active, not recruitingCandidiasis, Vulvovaginal
-
NCT05076409Completed
-
NCT07636018Completed