Mechanism of TIPS to Improve Sarcopenia

February 7, 2026 updated by: Jiacheng Liu, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Mechanism of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt to Improve Sarcopenia by Down-regulation of FGF21

Sarcopenia is particularly common in patients with chronic liver disease, especially in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, where the prevalence can be more than 50%. Sarcopenia is an important risk factor for a significant increase in mortality in cirrhotic patients, and is closely associated with a high incidence of complications such as hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, and infections . Recent studies have found that TIPS not only significantly improves clinical symptoms caused by portal hypertension, but may also have a positive effect on skeletal muscle mass and function in patients. Although the effect of TIPS in improving sarcopenia has been preliminarily confirmed, its mechanism is not yet fully understood. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore the mechanism of action of TIPS to improve sarcopenia and provide guidance for clinical treatment options.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

According to whether the sarcopenia improved or not in patients after TIPS, patients were divided into sarcopenia group and non-sarcopenia group, and the relationship between FGF21 levels and sarcopenia improvement in patients after TIPS was analyzed by analyzing the differences between the two groups. During the follow-up of patients after TIPS, blood samples were collected to test serum FGF21 levels and imaging examinations were performed to assess the improvement of sarcopenia; changes in nutritional status, muscle strength and function indicators were analyzed in the process of sarcopenia improvement; changes in serological indicators were analyzed in the process of sarcopenia improvement, with a focus on the serum FGF21 level; the combination of the serum FGF21 level and the muscle strength and function indicators, and evaluate their value in the prognosis of TIPS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
132

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Wuhan, Taiwan, 430022
        • Recruiting
        • Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with cirrhosis and requiring TIPS treatment, willing to participate in this study, and meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with liver cirrhosis and needing TIPS surgical treatment;
  2. Aged between 18-80 years old;
  3. Able to understand and sign the informed consent form and willing to cooperate in completing the examinations and follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Combination of serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (such as acute myocardial infarction, severe heart failure, etc.);
  2. Suffering from malignant tumors and in the active stage;
  3. Recent (within 3 months) history of major surgeries or traumas;
  4. The presence of mental illness or cognitive disorders, which are unable to cooperate with the study;
  5. Undergoing other special treatments that may affect the results of the study (such as certain specific immune-suppressing agents, hormones, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Sarcopenia
Patients were diagnosed with sarcopenia on the basis of CT-quantified skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) during preoperative TIPS and postoperative follow-up. The European Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines were used to determine the threshold value for sarcopenia, and SMI was calculated from the ratio of L3 cross-sectional area to height on CT images; those with <50 cm²/m² in men and <39 cm²/m² in women were diagnosed with sarcopenia. Patients with preoperative sarcopenia and 1-year postoperative sarcopenia who were still diagnosed with sarcopenia were in the sarcopenia group.
Procedure: Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt
All patients were treated with Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS).
Other Names:
  • TIPS
Non-sarcopenia
Patients were diagnosed with sarcopenia on the basis of CT-quantified skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) during preoperative TIPS and postoperative follow-up. The European Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines were used to determine the threshold value for sarcopenia, and SMI was calculated from the ratio of L3 cross-sectional area to height on CT images; those with <50 cm²/m² in men and <39 cm²/m² in women were diagnosed with sarcopenia. Patients with sarcopenia before TIPS and without sarcopenia 1 year after TIPS were considered the non-sarcopenia group.
Procedure: Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt
All patients were treated with Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS).
Other Names:
  • TIPS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pearson Correlation between Changes in Serum Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) Levels and Changes in Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) at 1 Year after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS)
Time Frame: 1 year
This endpoint evaluates whether longitudinal changes in circulating FGF21 levels after TIPS have a significant Pearson correlation with changes in skeletal muscle mass. Skeletal muscle mass is quantified by the Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI), which is measured by abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) in the unit of cm²/m² . Serum FGF21 levels are measured by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) in the unit of picogram per milliliter (pg/mL). This endpoint is intended to determine the role of FGF21 in TIPS-related improvement of sarcopenia.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pearson Correlation Analysis between Changes in Handgrip Strength and Dynamic Changes in Serum Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) Levels after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS)
Time Frame: 1 year
This outcome measure focuses on the dynamic changes in skeletal muscle strength after TIPS, with handgrip strength as the sole assessment index, measured by an electronic handgrip dynamometer in the unit of kilogram-force (kgf). Serum FGF21 levels are measured by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) in the unit of picogram per milliliter (pg/mL). Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the linear correlation between the dynamic changes in handgrip strength and the dynamic changes in serum FGF21 levels after TIPS, so as to reflect the functional recovery status of skeletal muscle in the dimension of muscle strength.
1 year
Pearson Correlation Analysis between Changes in Gait Speed and Dynamic Changes in Serum Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) Levels after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS)
Time Frame: 1 year
This outcome measure focuses on the dynamic changes in physical motor function after TIPS, with gait speed as the sole assessment index, measured by the 6-meter walk test in the unit of meter per second (m/s). Serum FGF21 levels are measured by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) in the unit of picogram per milliliter (pg/mL). Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the linear correlation between the dynamic changes in gait speed and the dynamic changes in serum FGF21 levels after TIPS, so as to reflect the functional recovery status of skeletal muscle in the dimension of physical performance.
1 year
Association between Dynamic Changes in Serum Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) Levels and Overall Survival after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS)
Time Frame: 1 year
This endpoint investigates whether longitudinal dynamic changes in serum FGF21 levels have a significant association with the overall survival of patients after TIPS, so as to explore the prognostic value of serum FGF21 levels for the survival outcome of patients after TIPS. Cox proportional hazards regression model will be used to analyze the association between dynamic changes in serum FGF21 levels and overall survival, so as to determine whether dynamic changes in serum FGF21 levels are independent influencing factors of overall survival in patients after TIPS. Serum FGF21 levels are measured by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) in the unit of picogram per milliliter (pg/mL). Overall survival is defined as the time from TIPS surgery to all-cause death or the last follow-up, assessed based on clinical follow-up records in the unit of month.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 27, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TIPS improves sarcopenia

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings