Mitral Valve Annulus Assessment, Multimodality Imaging (MAS-3D)

August 12, 2025 updated by: Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Mitral Valve Annulus Assessment, a Comparison Between 3D-TOE, CCT and Surgical Ring

The success of mitral valve repair with annuloplasty depends on the repair technique and on the choice of a ring with appropriate dimensions related to mitral annulus. Intraoperatively, the choice of the prosthetic ring size is made by the surgeon using special gauges that are placed on the anterior mitral leaflet (having the trigons and commissures as anatomical findings), a method considered the gold standard for defining annulus size. However, it is performed in cardioplegia, without considering annulus shape and motion during cardiac cycle. Three-dimensional techniques are fundamental in evaluating mitral valve structure and its changes during cardiac cycle; three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography (3D-TOE) has been proven to be essential for the anatomo-functional characterization of mitral valve apparatus in patients undergoing surgically mitral valve repair. It also allows the measurement of quantitative parameters useful in determining the size of the annuloplasty ring, such as A2 scallop height, intertrigonal distance, intercommissural diameter and total annular perimeter size, that will support the surgeon's choice on the dimensions of the ring to be implanted. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) plays a key role for device sizing in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement; it provides isotropic sub-millimetre spatial resolution and it is the gold standard for geometric characterisation of the mitral valve and for assessment of the spatial relationship of mitral valve apparatus to adjacent anatomical structures. In patients undergoing mitral valve surgery it is foremost performed to exclude coronary artery disease, as stated by European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Several studies have compared CCT with 3D-TOE in sizing the mitral valve apparatus: Shanks et al. have demonstrated a good correlation between the two techniques in measuring intercommissural diameter; Hirasawa et al. have demonstrated a good correlation in evaluating intertrigonal distance. Only one study has compared the measures of the annulus obtained by CCT with the prosthetic ring (Alkhadi et al.) and only for 9 patients the intercommissural diameter was compared to the prosthetic ring, obtaining a good correlation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Roma, Italy, 00168
        • Recruiting
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Cardiologia
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Annalisa Pasquini, MD. PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with severe mitral regurgitation with indication to surgical treatment who are elegible according to inclusion and exclusion criteria

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years or older
  • Patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation, with an indication for surgical treatment of the valvopathy and who have undergone cardiac surgery for mitral valve surgery with prosthetic ring implantation
  • Pre-operative coronary CT scan as a diagnostic tool for the exclusion of coronary artery disease (in accordance with the guidelines for chronic coronary syndrome and valvulopathy) with adequate image quality to allow measurement of the mitral annulus
  • Availability of adequate three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstructions of the mitral valve apparatus at the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram to allow measurements of the annulus
  • Provision of informed consent prior to enrolment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Implantation of mitral valve prosthesis due to inability to perform mitral valve repair
  • Unavailability of CCT scan
  • Unavailability of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram
  • Unavailability of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison between 3D-TOE and CCT
Time Frame: 48 hours
The reliability of mitral annulus measurements obtained by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (evaluated in terms of anterior leaflet length, intertrigonal distance and intercommissural diameter) compared to cardiac computed tomography.
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determination of the best measure
Time Frame: 1 year
To demonstrate whether any of the individual variables (anterior leaflet height, intertrigonal distance and intercommissural diameter) correlates better with the size of the implanted ring size (from the available data, the intercommissural diameter has shown a better correlation than the intertrigonal distance, although there are no studies that have directly compared the two values).
1 year
Comparison between CCT and surgery
Time Frame: 48 hours
The reliability of mitral annulus measurements obtained by cardiac computed tomography with the dimensions of the implanted ring during cardiac mitral valve repair surgery.
48 hours
Comparison between 3D-TOE and surgery
Time Frame: 24 hours
The reliability of mitral annulus measurements obtained by intraoperative three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiogram with the dimensions of the implanted ring during cardiac mitral valve repair surgery
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Annalisa Pasquini, MD, PhD, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 12, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 7065

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings