Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation

May 6, 2025 updated by: Xu jianmin

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Emulating the Target Trial

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of robotic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery in treating low rectal cancer. While robotic surgery has gained popularity, there is limited long-term evidence regarding its outcomes. By using real-world data from a specialized multicenter colorectal cancer database in Shanghai, China, this retrospective cohort study will emulate the target trial to evaluate whether robotic surgery offers advantages over laparoscopic surgery. Key factors such as disease-free survival, locoregional recurrence, circumferential margin positivity, and postoperative complications will be examined. The goal is to provide stronger, evidence-based support for the clinical use of robotic surgery in treating low rectal cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2702

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200000
        • Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The data is sourced from the Colorectal Cancer Specialty Cohort Database and Biobank, established through the "Construction and Application of the Shanghai Colorectal Cancer Specialty Cohort Database and Biobank" project. The research will utilize cohort data collected from January 2021 to May 2022 (17 months). This specialized database was led by Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, in collaboration with Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Changhai Hospital), Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and Shanghai First People's Hospital.

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Age from 18 years to 80 years;
  2. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I - III;
  3. Histologically proved rectal adenocarcinoma;
  4. Inferior tumor edge ≤ 10 cm from anal verge, measured by rigid rectoscopy;
  5. Tumor assessed as cT1-T3 (mesorectal fascia not involved) N0-1, or ycT1-T3 Nx after preoperative radio- or chemoradiotherapy, measured by pelvic MRI;
  6. No evidence of distant metastases (including pelvis, peritoneum, liver, lung, brain, bone, distant lymph node, etc), according to ultrasound, CT, MRI, PET-CT, etc;
  7. No other malignancies in medical history except adequately treated basocellular carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri;
  8. Received either robotic or laparoscopic surgery; 9） Surgery with radical intent;

10) Informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Emergency surgery for acute intestinal obstruction, bleeding, perforation, etc;
  2. Synchronous colon surgery for multiple colorectal tumors or other schedules;
  3. Hereditary colorectal cancer (familial adenomatosis polyposis, Lynch Syndrome, etc.);
  4. Co-existent inflammatory bowel disease;
  5. Pregnancy or lactation;
  6. Patients received treatment other than preoperative radio- or chemoradiotherapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Robotic group
Patients received robotic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer
Procedure: Robotic surgery
Robotic surgery for radical resection of middle and low rectal cancer
Laparoscopic group
Patients received laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer
Procedure: Laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopic surgery for radical resection of middle and low rectal cancer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-year postoperative disease-free survival rate
Time Frame: From surgery to three years postoperatively
Disease-free survival event is defined as any death or locoregional recurrence or distant metastases.
From surgery to three years postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Circumferential resection margin positivity rate
Time Frame: 14 days during postoperative pathological examination
Circumferential resection margin positivity is defined as 1 mm or less from the tumor.
14 days during postoperative pathological examination
30-day postoperative complication rate (Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher grade)
Time Frame: From surgery to 30 days postoperatively
30-day postoperative complication rate is defined according to the Clavien-Dindo grade system. Only complications in grade 2 or higher grade will be calculated.
From surgery to 30 days postoperatively
3-year postoperative locoregional recurrence rate
Time Frame: From surgery to three years postoperatively
Locoregional recurrence is defined as any cancer recurrence in the pelvic or perineal area.
From surgery to three years postoperatively
rate of abdominoperineal resection
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
percentage of patients received abdominoperineal resection
30 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Xu jianmin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 3, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 7, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CCS-DASET-TTE-REAL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings