Effectiveness of Nurse Tele-consultation on the Quality of Elective Colonoscopy, Procedure-related Anxiety, and Financial Toxicity
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Nurse Tele-consultation on the Quality of Elective Colonoscopy, Procedure-related Anxiety, and Financial Toxicity
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness, in daily clinical practice, of a tele-consultation procedure (defined as a telephone consultation with the patient conducted by nursing staff with an appropriate level of experience in digestive endoscopy) with the goal of:
- improving adherence to methods and timing for the correct intake of the intestinal preparation by patients undergoing elective colonoscopy;
- assessing whether the tele-consultation can reduce anxiety and procedure-related stress, promoting a better emotional state in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Francesco De Falco, Nursing degree
- Phone Number: 0039 0811770813
- Email: endoscopia@istitutotumori.na.it
Study Locations
-
-
-
Naples, Italy, 80131
- Recruiting
- S.S.D. Garoenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva
-
Contact:
- Francesco De Falco, Nursing degree
- Phone Number: 0039 08117770813
- Email: endoscopia@istitutotumori.na.it
-
Contact:
- Mario De Bellis, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects eligible for outpatient pancolonoscopy:
- for diagnostic purposes;
- for screening purposes;
- for post-polypectomy follow-up;
- of both genders;
- of all ethnicities;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients under 18 years of age or over 80 years of age;
- Patients on waiting lists with SHORT priority: the procedure to be provided within a short time (no more than 10 days);
- Patients included in GOM pathways who undergo colonoscopy within 10 days;
- Pregnancy;
- Presence of known contraindications to bowel preparation;
- Presence of known contraindications to performing pancolonoscopy;
- Patients who have undergone colonic resection and/or have a colostomy/ileostomy;
- Patients with cognitive impairments;
- Patients declared legally incompetent or unable to understand and make decisions;
- Patients unable to provide informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Standard arm
|
|
|
Experimental: nurse tele-consultation arm
Use of the nurse tele-consultation tool in the Intervention arm administered 5±2 days before the colonoscopy procedure.
|
Tele-consultation procedure is defined as a telephone consultation with the patient conducted by nursing staff with an appropriate level of experience in digestive endoscopy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of intestinal preparation. BBPS score (BOSTON BOWEL PREPARATION SCORE)
Time Frame: at the end of colonoscopy up to 12 months
|
Compare the quality of the colonoscopy between patients who received tele-consultation (INTERVENTION Group) and those who did not receive tele-consultation (CONTROL Group) based on the BBPS score (BOSTON BOWEL PREPARATION SCORE).
The BBPS score ranges from 0 to 9 based on intestinal preaparation in cecum, colon and rectum.
Each section is scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= unprepared to 3= excellent).
The total BBPS score is the sum of the scores from the three sections (score 0 to 5=Poor preparation; score 6 to 7= fair preparation; score 8 to 9=good preparation).
A higher score indicates better bowel preparation, which is ideal for a successful colonoscopy.
|
at the end of colonoscopy up to 12 months
|
|
H.A.D.S. (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Time Frame: baseline, before colonoscopy up to 12 months
|
Compare the quality of the emotional state between the sample of patients who received tele-consultation (INTERVENTION Group) and those who did not receive tele-consultation (CONTROL Group) based on the H.A.D.S. score (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale).The scale consists of 14 items, with 7 questions related to anxiety and 7 related to depression. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (from 0=not at all to 3= most of the time). The total score for each section (anxiety and depression) can range from 0 to 21, and then the scores from both sections are combined for a total score ranging from 0 to 42. The minimun score is 0-7 that means normal (little to no anxiety or depression). The maximum score is 15-21 that means severe (significant anxiety or depression). |
baseline, before colonoscopy up to 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Effectiveness of a colonoscopy in detecting adenomas. Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)
Time Frame: at the end of colonoscopy up to 12 months
|
Quality of colonoscopies between patients who received tele-consultation and those who did not receive tele-consultation based on ADR.
ADR represents the percentage of patients undergoing colonoscopy in which at least one adenoma is detected.
|
at the end of colonoscopy up to 12 months
|
|
Rate of cecal intubation
Time Frame: at the end of colonoscopy up to 12 months
|
Cecal intubation rate in patients of the 2 study groups
|
at the end of colonoscopy up to 12 months
|
|
Financial Toxicity (FT) using the "PROFFIT questionnaire"
Time Frame: baseline (before colonoscopy) up to 12 months
|
Assessment of FT through PROFFIT questionnaire.
This is an Italian instrument for evaluating FT in patients in the Italian healthcare context.
It includes 16 total items, 7 measuring FT (defining the PROFFIT financial score) and 9 measuring possible determinants of FT.
The score range from 0-100 (the higher value means precence of FT).
|
baseline (before colonoscopy) up to 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Francesco De Falco, Nursing degree, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Registry 26-23
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.