Adaptive vs. Continuous Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease (CLOSE-PD)
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Adaptive Versus Continuous Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease
The objective of the CLOSE-PD study is to compare the efficacy of adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) with continue deep brain stimulation (cDBS) in patients with Parkinson's disease. The main question it aims to answer is:
- whether the change in daily mean ON time without troublesome dyskinesia in aDBS is greater than cDBS over a six-month follow-up period?
Researchers will compare aDBS to regular continue deep brain stimulation (cDBS).
Participants will:
- be set up to cDBS during the first programming visit (visit 2);
- be randomized 1:1 to aDBS or cDBS two weeks after visit 2;
- follow-up will be at three and six months after visit 2;
- complete PD Home diary at baseline, two weeks, three months and at six months after visit 2.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: M. Beudel, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +31 20 566 9111
- Email: closepd@amsterdamumc.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Leuven, Belgium
- Not yet recruiting
- UZ Leuven
-
Sub-Investigator:
- B. Swinnen, MD, PhD
-
-
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Recruiting
- Amsterdam UMC
-
Principal Investigator:
- Martijn Beudel, MD, PhD
-
Maastricht, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- Maastricht UMC+
-
Sub-Investigator:
- M.L.F. Janssen, MD, PhD
-
The Hague, Netherlands
- Not yet recruiting
- Hagaziekenhuis
-
Sub-Investigator:
- M.F. Contarino, MD, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of idiopathic PD based on the UK Brain Bank criteria (Hughes et al. 1992);
- Age older than 18 years;
- Previous implantation of Medtronic PerceptTM PC/RC DBS electrodes bilateral targeting the STN;
- Optimal contact point compatible with aDBS in at least one STN;
- Reliable beta peak in at least one STN;
- Able to provide informed consent and comply with the study protocol;
- Understand the Dutch language.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Legally incompetent adults;
- Patients with ongoing participation in other clinical trials involving neurological interventions;
- Inability to recognize the difference between the motor ON or OFF state;
- Mild cognitive impairment or dementia;
- Pregnancy.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: aDBS group
65 patients with Parkinson's disease will receive adaptive DBS.
|
The Medtronic Percept device will be activated with the aDBS functionality.
Participant will receive adaptive DBS.
|
|
Active Comparator: cDBS group
65 patients with Parkinson's disease will receive continue DBS.
|
The Medtronic Percept device will be equipped with aDBS functionality (to maintain the blinding of the allocation), but this functionality will remain inactive.
Participant will receive continue DBS.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Home PD diary
Time Frame: change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
The primary outcome is the comparison between the aDBS group and the cDBS group of the change from baseline to six months in mean daily ON time without troublesome dyskinesia.
Daily ON time without troublesome dyskinesia is measured with the PD home diary.
The PD home diary is a self-reported tool for tracking motor symptoms in Parkinson's patients every 30 minutes for three days within a one-week window
|
change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PD Home diary
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
ON time without troublesome dyskinesia
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
MDS-UPDRS III (ON and OFF phase)
Time Frame: change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
Motor symptoms
|
change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
|
MDS-UPDRS IV
Time Frame: change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
Motor complication including motor fluctuations and dyskinesias
|
change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
|
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
Quality of life
|
change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
|
Dopaminergic medication usage
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
MoCA is a cognitive screening tool for detecting and scoring cognitive impairment
|
change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
Mood status
|
change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
|
Starkstein Apathy Scale (SAS)
Time Frame: change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
Apathy status
|
change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
|
Side effects
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
Number and sort of side effects
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
Time of DBS titration
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
Duration of DBS titration based on the number and duration of hospital visits
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
Assessor's evaluation of the ease of programming
Time Frame: after six months of follow-up
|
Five-point Likert scale
|
after six months of follow-up
|
|
Beta oscillatory activity
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
Amount of decrease of oscillatory activity in the beta range
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
DBS settings (1)
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
Electrical energy consumption expressed by the Total electrical energy delivered (TEED)
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
DBS settings (2)
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
DBS amplitudes in mA
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
DBS settings (3)
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
Average stimulation fraction expressed as percentages
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS-2)
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
Sleep disturbances and quality of sleep
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
LFP characteristics (2)
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
Beta power spectral density expressed as µV²/Hz
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
LFP characteristics (2)
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
Beta volatility expressed as a.u.
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
Participant's evaluation of the burden of the treatment
Time Frame: after six months of follow-up
|
Five-point Likert scale
|
after six months of follow-up
|
|
Participant's satisfaction on the outcome of treatment
Time Frame: after six months of follow-up
|
Five-point Likert scale
|
after six months of follow-up
|
|
PD Home diary
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
ON time with troublesome dyskinesia
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
PD Home diary
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
ON time without dyskinesia
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
PD Home diary
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
OFF time
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
PD Home diary
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
Asleep time
|
during six months of follow-up
|
|
Academic Medical Center Linear Disability Score (ALDS) (ON and OFF phase)
Time Frame: change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
Level of physical disability
|
change from baseline to six months of DBS
|
|
Time to final adjustment of the DBS settings
Time Frame: during six months of follow-up
|
first time point for stimulation parameters following the last adjustment of the stimulation parameters
|
during six months of follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Martijn Beudel, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NL009220
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.