Enteric-Coated Peppermint Oil Versus Standard Antispasmodic in SLC6A4 (5-HTTLPR) Carriers With Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

April 17, 2025 updated by: S.LAB (SOLOWAYS)

"A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial of Enteric-Coated Peppermint Oil Versus Standard Antispasmodic in SLC6A4 (5-HTTLPR) Carriers With Irritable Bowel Syndrome."

This study is a non-inferiority, double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing enteric-coated peppermint oil with a standard antispasmodic (e.g., mebeverine) in adult IBS patients who carry at least one "S" allele in the SLC6A4 (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism. The primary goal is to see whether peppermint oil provides symptom relief (measured by IBS severity scores) that is not worse than the antispasmodic by more than a predefined margin (30 points on the IBS-SSS). Secondary goals include evaluating differences in abdominal pain, stool patterns, quality of life, and adverse event profiles, with a focus on peppermint oil's tolerability. About 224 participants (112 per arm) will be enrolled, with allowances for dropout, to detect non-inferiority at 80% power. After 12 weeks of treatment, results will inform whether peppermint oil is a viable, well-tolerated alternative to standard antispasmodics, especially in patients with heightened GI sensitivity linked to the SLC6A4 polymorphism.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority RCT will randomize ~250 adults (18-65 y) who meet Rome IV criteria for IBS and carry at least one short 5-HTTLPR (SLC6A4) allele to enteric-coated peppermint-oil capsules (180 mg three times daily) or the standard antispasmodic mebeverine (135 mg three times daily) for 12 weeks. Because the S-allele reduces serotonin-transporter expression and heightens visceral sensitivity, the study targets a genetically defined subgroup in which menthol's smooth-muscle-relaxing calcium-channel blockade may yield clinically meaningful benefit with fewer anticholinergic effects. Randomisation (1 : 1) is web-based, stratified by genotype and centre, and treatments are packaged identically to maintain blinding of participants, investigators, and outcome assessors. The primary endpoint is change from baseline in the IBS Severity Scoring System at week 12; non-inferiority is met if the upper bound of the two-sided 95 % CI for the treatment difference (peppermint - mebeverine) is ≤ +30 points. A mixed-model repeated-measures analysis will be applied to both intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations, providing 80 % power with ~112 evaluable patients per arm. Secondary outcomes include abdominal-pain intensity, stool form, quality of life, global satisfaction, and adverse events; safety is tracked via weekly contacts, laboratory tests, and an independent data-safety monitoring board. Demonstrating that peppermint oil is at least as effective as mebeverine while better tolerated would support its use as a genotype-guided first-line therapy for IBS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
224

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630090
        • Center for New Medical Technologirs

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-65 years.
  • Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome by Rome IV criteria, with at least moderate severity (IBS-SSS ≥ 175).
  • SLC6A4 genotyping confirms at least one S allele (SS or SL).
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • L/L genotype of 5-HTTLPR.
  • Known organic GI diseases (e.g., IBD, celiac disease).
  • Severe/unstable comorbidities (e.g., cardiac, hepatic, or renal dysfunction).
  • Use of peppermint oil, antispasmodics, or investigational drugs within 30 days prior to enrollment.
  • . Known hypersensitivity to peppermint or mebeverine.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Significant psychiatric illness that, in the investigator's judgment, might interfere with participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Enteric-coated peppermint oil capsules (~180 mg total peppermint oil/ capsule) to ensure release in
Dietary supplement: Peppermint Oil

Enteric-coated peppermint oil capsules (~180 mg total peppermint oil/ capsule) to ensure release in the small intestine.

1 capsule three times daily, 30 minutes before meals, for 12 weeks.
Active Comparator: A standard antispasmodiс
A standard antispasmodic (e.g., mebeverine 135 mg).
Drug: A standard antispasmodic
A standard antispasmodic (e.g., mebeverine 135 mg). 1 tablet three times daily, before meals, for 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Symptom severity in this trial is captured with the IBS-SSS (IBS Severity Scoring System): 0 = no symptoms to 500 = most severe symptoms
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events: Incidence
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Number of any adverse events
12 weeks
Numeric Rating Scale (for abdominal pain)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Range: 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable pain
12 weeks
Abdominal Pain: Measured by visual analog score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
0 as a minimum value and 10 maximum value
12 weeks
Stool Consistency: Bristol Stool Form Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
range 1-7, 1 = separate hard lumps/constipation, 7 = watery stool/diarrhea; higher scores indicate looser stool
12 weeks
Quality of Life: Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 weeks
transformed score 0-100; higher scores indicate better IBS-specific quality of life
12 weeks
Quality of Life: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: 12 weeks
domain and summary scores 0-100; higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life
12 weeks
Global Patient Satisfaction: Five-point Likert Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
ange 1-5 (1 = very dissatisfied, 5 = very satisfied); higher scores indicate greater satisfaction
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
S.LAB (SOLOWAYS)

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Center for New Medical Technologies, Novosibirsk, Russia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 17, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 7, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 17, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SW027

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings