At-home Treatment With Cortico-spinal tDCS for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (tDCS-ALS)

June 9, 2025 updated by: Alberto Benussi, University of Trieste

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Home-based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Physical Function in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurological disease that causes gradual muscle weakness and loss of muscle mass. It affects all muscles that control movement, speech, swallowing, and breathing. Unfortunately, ALS is currently incurable, and treatments are limited. Only two medications, riluzole and edaravone, have been approved and can slightly extend survival, typically between 20 and 48 months from diagnosis.

Recent research has identified a useful biomarker known as neurofilament light chain (NfL), which increases in the blood as nerve cells become damaged. Measuring NfL levels can help track the progression of ALS.

A promising non-invasive treatment called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown potential benefits for patients with ALS. tDCS involves safely applying mild electrical currents to specific areas of the brain and spinal cord. This approach aims to stimulate nerve cells, potentially improving their function and slowing disease progression. Initial studies have reported temporary improvements in muscle strength and survival when tDCS was used over a short period.

Based on these encouraging results, our study proposes a new home-based tDCS treatment program specifically designed for ALS patients. Participants will use an easy-to-operate, safe, and portable device at home. The treatment involves placing electrodes on the scalp and the neck area to stimulate both the motor areas of the brain and the spinal cord. Therapy sessions will occur five days per week over 16 weeks.

This home-based approach allows patients to comfortably receive therapy without daily trips to the hospital, making treatment more accessible and convenient. By providing this therapy at home, the investigators aim to improve the quality of life for ALS patients and explore new possibilities in treating and managing ALS and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an irreversible neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, affecting all skeletal and respiratory muscles. This leads to increasing difficulties in speech, swallowing, and ultimately breathing. A progressive rise in neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels-biomarkers of neuronal damage-has also been documented and may serve as a tool for monitoring disease progression. Average survival ranges from 20 to 48 months. Currently, there is no cure for ALS. Only two drugs, riluzole and edaravone, have demonstrated a modest extension of survival. In this context, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive neuromodulatory technique capable of modulating central nervous system excitability. Its popularity is growing due to its simplicity, low cost, and broad therapeutic potential across various neurodegenerative conditions. tDCS exerts long-lasting effects on synaptic plasticity in the motor cortex, primarily through modulation of NMDA receptors and GABAergic systems. Given that ALS involves irreversible degeneration of both upper and lower motor neurons in the motor cortex and spinal cord, tDCS may offer therapeutic benefit. Preliminary studies have shown transient improvements in muscle strength and survival following cortico-spinal tDCS administered over two weeks.

Building on these findings, a protocol is proposed for home-based tDCS treatment in ALS patients, consisting of multiple sessions aimed at achieving greater and more sustained effects. A brain stimulation device specifically designed for home use will be employed. This device incorporates safety features that monitor for improper usage.

The procedure involves applying an anodal stimulation over the motor cortex bilaterally and a cathodal stimulation over the cervical spinal cord. Stimulation sessions will be conducted five days per week over a 16-week period. Home-based tDCS offers a safe alternative to hospital-based treatment, eliminating the need for daily travel and allowing patients to undergo therapy in the comfort of their own homes. This approach represents a potentially significant innovation in ALS care-offering a non-invasive, safe, and accessible therapeutic option that may enhance quality of life and open new avenues for research in neurodegenerative disease management.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Trieste, Italy, 34149
        • Recruiting
        • Clinica Neurologica, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alberto Benussi, MD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Paolo Manganotti, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alessio Bratina, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Edoardo Ricci, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jacopo Della Toffola, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Magda Quagliotto, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients with a probable, laboratory-supported diagnosis of ALS, or defined ALS according to current clinical criteria
  • Age greater than 18 years
  • Onset of disease ≤ 24 months
  • Disease progression in the last 3 months
  • A score ≥ 2 on the "respiratory failure" item on the ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R)
  • Treatment with riluzole or edaravone is permitted, provided it has been stable for at least 1 month prior to enrollment in the study, or no ALS-specific treatment
  • Presence of a caregiver who can assist the patient and who has successfully completed the necessary training in the use of the device
  • Signature of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People with fixed electrical stimulators (e.g. cardiac pacemakers, nerve stimulators, hearing implants) that would not work or would be damaged by the electric field;
  • People with particular intracranial metal foreign bodies (e.g. splinters, some prostheses, screws and nails) that could interact with the electric field
  • People with a history of epilepsy;
  • As the effects of tDCS on the developing fetus are not known, pregnant women will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Real tDCS

The device used for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is the Soterix Medical 1x1 tES mini-CT. The device is designed to be used at home by patients, with built-in safety controls to ensure adequate and safe stimulation. The electrodes of the device will be positioned according to the following scheme: one electrode (anode) will be applied on the skin overlying the motor cortices, one electrode (cathode) will be applied on the skin overlying the cervical cord, in the area corresponding to C6. Dosage: 4 mA for the anodal electrode and 4 mA for the cathodal electrode (intensity could be reduced if not tollerate by the patient).

Duration of stimulation: 20 minutes per session. Frequency: 5 days per week (Monday - Friday) for 16 weeks.
Device: Real tDCS
The electrodes of the device will be positioned according to the following scheme: one electrode (anode) will be applied on the skin overlying the motor cortices, one electrode (cathode) will be applied on the skin overlying the cervical cord, in the area corresponding to C6. Dosage: 4 mA for the anodal electrode and 4 mA for the cathodal electrode (intensity could be reduced if not tollerate by the patient). Duration of stimulation: 20 minutes per session. Frequency: 5 days per week (Monday - Friday) for 16 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS

The placebo device uses the same model as the tDCS device but without actually delivering the current. The electrodes will be positioned in the same way as the active device, but the current flow will be limited to the ramp-up (start of stimulation) and ramp-down (end of stimulation) phase, mimicking the sensation of stimulation without providing actual treatment.

Dosage: Simulation of stimulation without actual current. Duration of stimulation: 20 minutes per session. Frequency: 5 days per week (Monday - Friday) for 16 weeks.
Device: Sham tDCS
The electrodes will be positioned in the same way as the active device, but the current flow will be limited to the ramp-up (start of stimulation) and ramp-down (end of stimulation) phase, mimicking the sensation of stimulation without providing actual treatment. Dosage: Simulation of stimulation without actual current. Duration of stimulation: 20 minutes per session. Frequency: 5 days per week (Monday - Friday) for 16 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in the ALSFRS-R between groups at 16 weeks.
Time Frame: Baseline - 16 weeks
Difference in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) between groups at 16 weeks. The ALSFRS provides a physician-generated estimate of the patient's degree of functional impairment, which can be evaluated serially to objectively assess any response to treatment or progression of disease. The ALSFRS includes ten questions that rate the patients level of functional impairment in performing one of ten common tasks. Each task is rated on a five-point scale from 0 (can't do) to 4 (normal ability). Individual item scores are summed to produce a reported score of between 40 (no impairment) and 0 (severe impairment).
Baseline - 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in the ALSFRS-R between groups at 32 weeks and 48 weeks
Time Frame: 32 weeks - 48 weeks
Difference in the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) between groups at 32 weeks and 48 weeks. The ALSFRS provides a physician-generated estimate of the patient's degree of functional impairment, which can be evaluated serially to objectively assess any response to treatment or progression of disease. The ALSFRS includes ten questions that rate the patients level of functional impairment in performing one of ten common tasks. Each task is rated on a five-point scale from 0 (can't do) to 4 (normal ability). Individual item scores are summed to produce a reported score of between 40 (no impairment) and 0 (severe impairment).
32 weeks - 48 weeks
Difference in the ALSAQ-40 between groups
Time Frame: Baseline - 16 weeks - 32 weeks - 48 weeks

Difference in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire-40 score (ALSAQ-40) from baseline.The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire (ALSAQ) is a patient self-report health status scale. The ALSAQ is specifically used to measure the subjective well-being of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. There are 40 items/questions with 5 discrete scales: physical mobility (10 items), activities of daily living and independence (10 items), eating and drinking (3 items), communication (7 items), emotional reactions (10 items). Patients are asked to think about the difficulties they may have experienced during the last two weeks (e.g. I have found it difficult to feed myself). Patients are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale):

never/rarely/sometimes/often/always or cannot do at all. The total ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 160 (severe impairment).
Baseline - 16 weeks - 32 weeks - 48 weeks
Difference in the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) score between groups
Time Frame: Baseline - 16 weeks - 32 weeks - 48 weeks
Difference in the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) score between groups from baseline.The CBI scale is 24- item scale designed to assess the experience of caregivers of older people. The multidimensional instrument assesses five domains of burden (time-dependence, developmental, physical, social, and emotional). Items are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from "not at all descriptive" to "very descriptive". The scale ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 96 (severe impairment).
Baseline - 16 weeks - 32 weeks - 48 weeks
Difference in Quality of Life EQ-5D-5L Scale between groups
Time Frame: Baseline - 16 weeks - 32 weeks - 48 weeks
Difference in Quality of Life EQ-5D-5L Scale between groups from baseline.The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The scale ranges from 5 (no impairment) to 25 (severe impairment).
Baseline - 16 weeks - 32 weeks - 48 weeks
Difference in Muscle strength assessed by manual dynamometer from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline - 16 weeks - 32 weeks - 48 weeks
Muscle strength will be evaluated using a handheld dynamometer, a validated tool for objective measurement of isometric muscle force. Muscle groups typically involved in ALS will be assessed bilaterally using standardized testing positions. For each muscle group, participants will be instructed to perform a maximal voluntary isometric contraction against the dynamometer for approximately 3-5 seconds. Two trials will be performed per muscle, and the highest peak force (measured in Newtons) will be recorded. The sum of 10 muscles per side (20 overall) will be evaluated.
Baseline - 16 weeks - 32 weeks - 48 weeks
Difference in Plasma neurofilament levels between groups
Time Frame: Baseline - 16 weeks - 32 weeks - 48 weeks
Difference in Plasma neurofilament levels between groups from baseline. Neurofilament light chain (NfL), a well-established biomarker of neuroaxonal injury, can be reliably quantified in plasma (pNfL) and has shown superior diagnostic accuracy in differentiating patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) from those with ALS mimic syndromes. In addition, numerous studies have emphasized the prognostic value of both cerebrospinal (cNfL) and plasma (pNfL) NfL levels, reporting strong correlations with disease progression rate (DPR) and overall survival. Notably, early longitudinal investigations indicate that pNfL levels remain relatively stable over the disease course, underscoring their promise as biomarkers for monitoring therapeutic response.
Baseline - 16 weeks - 32 weeks - 48 weeks
Difference in Survival from the onset of symptoms between groups
Time Frame: Continuously - 48 weeks
Difference in Survival from the onset of symptoms between groups. Survival is defined as the time from the symptom onset to death from any cause. Patients who are alive at the time of the last follow-up are censored at the date of last contact.
Continuously - 48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Trieste

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alberto Benussi, MD, University of Trieste

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 19, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 5, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 371/2024H

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)

Clinical Trials on Real tDCS

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings