Blood Flow Restriction Therapy to Optimize Muscle Size and Strength in Recovery From Lower Limb Fractures (BOOST)

August 1, 2025 updated by: Kelly A. Lefaivre, University of British Columbia

BOOST- Blood Flow Restriction Therapy to Optimize Muscle Size and Strength in Recovery From Lower Limb Orthopaedic Trauma

This study will assess the feasibility and effectiveness of blood flow restriction therapy in patients with tibia fractures (or lower leg bone). Personalized blood flow restriction therapy has shown to help people regain muscle size and strength after surgical treatment by allowing them to be able to start physiotherapy on their injured leg sooner. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of personalized blood flow restriction therapy to improve thigh muscle size and strength in patients with lower limb tibia fractures which require a period of non-weightbearing.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Lower limb fractures constitute the largest burden of fracture care globally. It is well documented that major upper and lower extremity trauma results in significant disability, with a protracted trajectory of recovery. A large proportion of these fracture can require a period of immobilization or protected weight bearing for up to 12 weeks depending on the nature, location and treatment of the fracture. Loss of muscle bulk and functional strength can occur with immobilization and disuse in as early as five days, and is confounded by severity of injury. Rehabilitation of these patients is focused on regaining range of motion, muscle strength and return to function. Traditional regimens to increase muscle size require exercises to be performed at high loads and intensities, typically at 60%-70% of a person's one repetition maximum. Due to the prolonged period of weight bearing protection and/or immobilization, and the recovery from the traumatic injury itself, most patients are unable to engage in high intensity and load exercises. This limits their ability to improve muscle size and strength and in turn slows down their return to function.

Blood flow restriction therapy (BFRT) originated in the 1960s in Japan. However, this initial approach was wrought with poor safety and reliability. The implementation of the automatic pneumatic tourniquet in 1979 allowed for the pressure applied by the tourniquet to be reliably controlled and replicated. Since then, multiple studies have been done to improve upon the technique, with the main aims to identify the optimal occlusion pressure and extent of blood flow restriction.

Blood flow restriction works on the principle of restricting arterial inflow and occluding venous outflow from the chosen limb. The personalized aspect is drawn from the fact that the pressure applied is a pre-determined percentage of the patient's Limb Occlusion Pressure (LOP). LOP is defined as the minimum pressure required, at a specific time by a specific tourniquet cuff applied to a specific patient's limb at a specific location, to stop the flow of arterial blood into the limb distal to the cuff. Benefits have been shown with blood flow restriction at 40%-80% of the patient's LOP. Further, despite the relationship between blood flow and fracture healing, studies in upper limb fractures have demonstrated that the reduced blood flow does not have a detrimental effect on bony union.

Personalized blood flow restriction therapy (BFRT) can help achieve similar muscle growth by performing exercises at lower loads and intensities (20%-30%) of one repetition maximum. There is significant excitement around this concept in elective orthopaedics, and this treatment modality has been shown to be effective in rehabilitation from ACL reconstruction, total knee replacements, wrist fractures and Achilles tendon ruptures. Although what is known about recovery and long-term disability in lower extremity orthopaedic trauma patients makes them an obvious candidate for this, there is a lack of evidence for use in lower limb fractures. With this pilot study, the investigators hope to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a larger RCT on this topic.

Hypotheses The investigators hypothesize that personalized BFRT will be tolerated by patients from 2 weeks post injury with increasing tolerance overtime. Personalized BFRT will demonstrate an increase in quadriceps muscle size and strength in the injured leg at 12 weeks following injury. The treatment effects of BFRT on lower extremity strength at 12 weeks in fracture patients will be used to inform the sample size calculation of a future definitive trial. The investigators further hypothesize that the proposed pilot trial will demonstrate feasibility of a future definitive trial.

Research design and methods This is a pilot study at a Level 1 Trauma Center (Vancouver General Hospital) involving patients with a peri-articular tibial fracture (treated operatively or non-operatively) which require a minimum 6 weeks of protected weight bearing (non weight bearing or partial weight bearing). Patients will be randomised to one of two groups - Physiotherapy with or without Blood Flow Restriction Therapy (PT with BFRT or PT without BFRT). Potential patients will be identified in the Orthopaedic Trauma outpatient clinic and physiotherapy departments. Recruitment and screening will be carried out as approved by the UBC Clinical Research Ethics Board. All patients presenting with a peri-articular tibial fracture (treated operatively or non-operatively) will be pre-screened, assigned a screening number, and recorded in a de-identified site screening log by the Orthopaedic Trauma research team. Those deemed potentially eligible will be approached by the research personnel. Informed, voluntary consent will be obtained from patients in a non-coercive manner. Patients will be enrolled for biweekly physiotherapy treatments from week 2 to week 12 post injury or post surgery. They will remain non-weightbearing for 6 weeks following the injury or surgery (first 4 weeks of physiotherapy). They Both groups will have standard clinical follow up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks post injury/surgery.

Once local ethics approval and the pneumatic tourniquet have been received and the pneumatic tourniquet, the training planned for two of our hospital physiotherapists will be finalized. These therapists work full time in the outpatient setting, which is dedicated to the care of injured patients, and where baseline therapy is completely funded by the local Health Authority. Local expertise for training, and preliminary collaborations have been established. Patients will be assigned to one of two of these physiotherapists regardless of whether they are allocated to the PT with BFRT or PT without BFRT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z1M9
        • University of British Columbia
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kelly Lefaivre, MD MSc FRCSC
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Stockton, MD MSc FRCSC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 19-60 who have sustained an isolated (single bone/area as per AO/OTA classification) unilateral lower limb fracture of the tibia that requires a period of 6 weeks of protected weight bearing (non-weight bearing or toe touch weight bearing)
  2. Must speak English
  3. Must be able to comply with protected weight bearing instructions for at least 6 weeks
  4. Must be able to consent for inclusion into the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have sustained multiple fractures in the same limb (i.e. AO/OTA 3 and 4, or 4 and 8 etc).
  2. Patients who have a neurovascular injury associated with the fracture
  3. Patients who have sustained bilateral lower limb injuries
  4. Patients aged <19 and >60
  5. Patients with known peripheral vascular disease or vascular repair
  6. Patients with known coagulation disorders
  7. Patients with compartment syndrome
  8. Patients with free tissue transfer for soft tissue coverage
  9. Patients with ongoing VTE or infection in the affected limb
  10. Non-ambulatory patients
  11. Patients who are pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Physiotherapy without BFRT
Experimental: Blood Flow Restriction Therapy (BFRT)
Physiotherapy with BFRT
Personalized Blood Flow Restriction Therapy uses an an inflatable cuff (Delfi PTS system) around the upper thigh which partially restricts arterial inflow during exercise. BFR allows for similar improvements of muscular strength and muscle mass as traditional heavy load strength training while using significantly lower loads. The reduced stress on supporting tissues ( tendons, joints, bones and ligaments) allows people who normally couldn't tolerate high loads to enhance their strength and muscle mass.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants who consent to participate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Percentage of participants approached for recruitment who consent to study participation
12 weeks
Number of participants self-reporting adherence to treatment protocol
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Percentage of participants enrolled in the study who report to completing their prescribed post injury physiotherapy sessions
12 weeks
Number of participants missing data on regular assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Percentage of participants with missing data on regular assessment
12 weeks
Number of participants who withdraw from the study
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Percentage of participants enrolled in the study who withdraw before completion of the study
12 weeks
Number of participants who complete follow up at 12 weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Percentage of enrolled participants who complete all follow up visits
12 weeks
Muscle strength tension and compression in pounds
Time Frame: 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery
Muscle strength of participants measured as force, tension and compression in pounds, in the affected limb using a dynamometer force gauge (ergoFET Digital Force Gauge)
0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery
Muscle size of the affected limb measured in centimeters
Time Frame: 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery
Muscle size of participants estimated by measuring muscle circumference of thigh at 10 cm above superior pole of patella in affected limb
0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery
Range of motion in degrees
Time Frame: 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery
Range of motion (degrees) of participants' knees (flexion, extension and rotation) and ankles (dorsiflexion and plantar flexion) using a goniometer.
0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery
Physical and mental health (SF12)
Time Frame: 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery
Physical and mental health of participants assessed using the short form health survey (SF12)
0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery
Ambulatory status
Time Frame: 0, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post the injury/surgery
Percentage of participants who do or do not require a walking aid including cane, walker, wheelchair, or other.
0, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post the injury/surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Limb Occlusion Pressure (LOP) in millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Time Frame: 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery
Participants' maximum percentage of Limb Occlusion Pressure (LOP) in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) at which all exercises could be completed
0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery
Number of participants with incomplete Limb Occlusion Pressure (LOP)
Time Frame: 0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery
Number of participants who could not complete the exercises at any percentage of Limb Occlusion Pressure (LOP)
0, 2, 6, 12 weeks post injury/surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Stockton, MD MSc FRCSC, University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H25-01080

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

  1. Will Individual participant data be available? Yes- only as permitted by UBC's Clinical Research Ethics Board
  2. What data: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in an published article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures) only as permitted by UBC's Clinical Research Ethics Board
  3. Other documentation: Study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent
  4. When data is available: Beginning 3 months and ending 24 months following publication.
  5. With whom: Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by UBC's Clinical Research Ethics Board.
  6. Types of analyses: To achieve the aims in the proposal approved by UBC's Clinical Research Ethics Board.
  7. Data made available: proposals may be submitted up to 24 months following article publication.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 24 months following publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in a published article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures) only as permitted by UBC's Clinical Research Ethics Board. Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by UBC's Clinical Research Ethics Board.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tibial Fracture

Clinical Trials on Blood Flow Restriction Therapy

Search Similar Trials