Blood Flow Restriction Therapy Combined With Neuromuscular Electrostimulation in Amateur Female Soccer Players

December 5, 2023 updated by: Carlos Fernández-Morales, Universidad de Extremadura

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Therapy Combined With Neuromuscular Electrostimulation in Amateur Female Soccer Players: A Pilot Study

The objective is to know the effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) and its combination with Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) Therapy in healthy amateur female soccer players.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The objective is to know the effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) and its combination with Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) Therapy in healthy amateur female soccer players.

For this purpose, a randomized clinical trial will be performed: 20 amateur female soccer players were distributed in two groups (control group n=10; experimental group n=10). In the control group, NMES (symmetrical biphasic rectangular pulse, 350 μs and 80Hz) combined simultaneously with active exercise in knee extension (75 repetitions in 4 sets, 20% 1RM, 30 seconds rest between sets) was applied. The experimental group performed the same intervention combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) therapy (80% of arterial occlusion pressure). The variables measured were muscle strength, muscle volume and static proprioception.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Badajoz, Spain, 06006
        • University of Extremadura

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be federated in a sports club playing 11-a-side soccer for at least the last two seasons.
  • Be between 16 and 28 years of age.
  • Be physically active players at the time of the study with a regular practice of at least 5 hours per week during the last 2 months,
  • Have been playing soccer for at least 5 hours per week during the last 2 months.
  • Have been playing soccer for at least 2 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who presented at the time of the study any lesion classified according to the Munich consensus and diagnosed by a doctor.
  • Those with systemic lupus erythematosus.
  • Hemophilia.
  • Unregulated hypertension.
  • History of pulmonary thromboembolism or stroke.
  • Impaired blood coagulation.
  • Contraceptive intake.
  • Spinal radicular lesions.
  • Previous surgeries related to the circulatory system.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
This arm only received the Neuromuscular and Muscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) intervention.
Consisting of the use of NMES (biphasic symmetrical pulse, bipolar mode, 50Hz frequency, pulse duration 300 μs at 1:1 ratio) (S82®; Enraf-Nonius BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands). The self-adhesive electrodes (8x5 cm2 Pals Platinum © type, Axelgaard Manufacturing Co. Ltd, Fallbrook, CA, USA) were placed on the quadriceps muscle. The positives electrodes placed distally on the rectus anterior and vastus externus and negative electrodes were placed proximally on the rectus anterior and vastus internus. The over current program consisted of 8 seconds (s) of work (ON phase) and 8 seconds of rest (OFF phase). The overcurrent program in the ON phase had a rise time of 2 s, a hold time of 4 s and a fall time of 2 s. The intensity of the electric current was increased to the maximum perceived tolerance, achieving a clear contraction without producing fatigue.
Experimental: Experimental group
This arm received the intervention with NMES and Blood flow restriction (BFR).
Consisting of the use of NMES (biphasic symmetrical pulse, bipolar mode, 50Hz frequency, pulse duration 300 μs at 1:1 ratio) (S82®; Enraf-Nonius BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands). The self-adhesive electrodes (8x5 cm2 Pals Platinum © type, Axelgaard Manufacturing Co. Ltd, Fallbrook, CA, USA) were placed on the quadriceps muscle. The positives electrodes placed distally on the rectus anterior and vastus externus and negative electrodes were placed proximally on the rectus anterior and vastus internus. The over current program consisted of 8 seconds (s) of work (ON phase) and 8 seconds of rest (OFF phase). The overcurrent program in the ON phase had a rise time of 2 s, a hold time of 4 s and a fall time of 2 s. The intensity of the electric current was increased to the maximum perceived tolerance, achieving a clear contraction without producing fatigue.
To attain partial vascular occlusion, a PTS ii portable tourniquet system (Delphi Medical, Vancouver, BC, Canada) with a corresponding size-specific tourniquet was placed around the patient's proximal thigh. This system allows for precise control of cuff pressure throughout training despite the changes in muscle volume that naturally occur while performing exercises. Total limb occlusion pressure (LOP) was identified by determining the pressure required to eliminate a detectable pulse using Doppler ultrasound. Partial vascular occlusion was achieved by setting the tourniquet to 80% of the LOP. This ensured that venous occlusion was obtained while still allowing arterial inflow and was personalized to each patient despite variations in thigh girth, cuff size, and systolic blood pressure. An Easy-Fit Tourniquet Cuff (Delfi Medical, Vancouver, VC, Canada) was used with the PTS ii system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscular Strenght
Time Frame: During the intervention, at day 1
It was performed using an isokinetic dynamometer (Kineo, Globus, Codognè, Italy). The maximum peak force that the user can perform was measured by means of the concentric-eccentric isokinetic force test. The patient is placed seated on the seat of the machine and with the dominant lower limb, performs 5 contractions with the maximum force, obtaining the concentric and eccentric peak force.
During the intervention, at day 1
Muscle volume
Time Frame: During the intervention, at day 1
It was performed by means of the thigh perimeter, using a tape measure. The superior pole of the patella is selected as an anatomical reference point and four segments are marked from it, located at 5, 10, 15 and 20 centimeters respectively (95). Subsequently, placing the beginning of the measuring tape at the mark of the segment in question, the thigh is encircled keeping the beginning of the tape fixed, which will coincide with a measurement of the tape when it is reached. This measurement is taken before the start of the quadriceps work with the knee extension exercise and at the end of the 15 minutes of rest after this work.
During the intervention, at day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee joint repositioning
Time Frame: During the intervention, at day 1
It was performed through the ability to perceive and reproduce an articular angle previously represented and explained passively. The angles are photographed and measured using the SAPO® computer program, by means of the placement of four marked points on the greater trochanter, lateral epicondyle of the femur, head of the fibula and peroneal malleolus. To perform this procedure, the user must memorize two positions, knee flexion of 90º and knee flexion of 135º, taking 3 photographs of each position in both seated and prone positions.
During the intervention, at day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Luis Espejo-Antúnez, Ph.D., University of Extremadura

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 04

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee

Clinical Trials on Electrostimulation

Subscribe