The Agenda-Setting for Kidney Disease Open Pilot Trial (ASK)
Setting the Agenda: An Open Pilot of a Structured Clinical Visit Agenda-Setting Intervention for Rural-Residing People With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease
The goal of this open pilot is to practice using an intervention and surveys before a larger pilot stepped wedge clinical trial. The intervention the researchers plan to use is Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics, and it is a structured clinical agenda-setting intervention (SAS), or a customized list of discussion topics. The people the researchers are practicing using the SAS with have advanced CKD (stages 4-5), and many of them live in rural areas. The researchers will practice administering CKD Topics, along with survey questions. By doing the open pilot, the researchers will learn if they need to modify the steps they plan to take in the larger trial.
The main questions the researchers aim to answer are:
- Do the steps for identifying eligible participants work?
- Do the steps for administering CKD Topics work?
- Do the steps to administer survey questions work?
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In this open pilot, the researchers will administer a novel structured agenda-setting tool (SAS) called Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics. The researchers will determine if their procedures for screening eligible participants, administering the intervention, and administering outcome and other questionnaires are appropriate. Learnings from the open pilot will feed forward into procedures in a larger planned pilot stepped wedge feasibility trial.
This study only has one arm, the intervention arm. The intervention, CKD Topics, will be administered as a quality improvement intervention.
Future Directions: This open pilot will inform procedural changes in an upcoming pilot stepped wedge feasibility trial.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Catherine H. Saunders, Assistant Professor of Medicine and of Health Policy, PhD, MPH
- Phone Number: 603-653-3436
- Email: Catherine.Hylas.Saunders@dartmouth.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Anne E. Dade, Research Associate, MPP
- Email: anne.e.dade@dartmouth.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Keene, New Hampshire, United States, 03431
- Recruiting
- Cheshire Medical Center/Dartmouth-Hitchcock
-
Contact:
- Maryam Gul, MD
- Phone Number: 603-354-6622
- Email: mgul@cheshire-med.com
-
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03766
- Not yet recruiting
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults >18 years old who have been diagnosed with advanced CKD (stages 4-5).
- Care partners, clinicians and staff supporting these CKD patients who are willing and able to provide informed consent
- English-speaking
- Able to provide informed consent
- Patient must be attending outpatient visits *(in-person and/or telehealth allowable).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children under 18 years old will not be included
- Non-English-speaking patients and/or care partners
- Patients on dialysis
- Individuals unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm 1 is Clinical Visit Agenda Setting Tool Intervention
The study team will implement a structured clinical visit agenda-setting (SAS) intervention customized for advanced chronic kidney disease, called Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics.
|
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics is a novel clinical visit agenda-setting intervention developed through participatory research methods for people with CKD living in rural areas.
CKD Topics includes 8 structured discussion topic areas with the option for patients to consider and indicate their priority topic areas and take notes before, during, and after a clinical visit.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Feasibility Outcome: Intervention receipt
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Our primary outcome will be feasibility, assessed by the proportion of patients who received the intervention.
|
Day 1
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Process Outcome: Enrollment Rate
Time Frame: Day 1
|
As measured by participant enrollment in Redcap.
|
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Patient Self-Advocacy Scale (PSAS)
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Patient Self-Advocacy Scale (PSAS); a 12-item validated scale assessing the latent construct of perceived self-advocacy for patients.
|
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Patient self-efficacy
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Patient self-efficacy measured using the Ask, Understand, Remember Assessment, (AURA); a validated 4-item assessment of self-efficacy completed by patients.
|
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Patient self-management
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Patient demonstration of self-management using the Perceived Medical Condition Self-Management Scale; an 8-item instrument validated to assess self-management among CKD patients; correlated with treatment adherence.
|
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Serious Illness Experience
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Serious illness experience measured by the consideRATE questions; a validated 8-item, plain language (2nd grade) patient-reported experience measure (PREM) with Likert-like response options for patients, and care partners.
|
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Respect Experience Assessment
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Respect experience assessment measured by the "Heard and understood" tool.
Heard and Understood is a validated Single-item PREM with Likert-like response options for patients.
|
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) scale
Time Frame: Day 1
|
The 10-item version, PEPPI is a valid and reliable measure of older patients' perceived self-efficacy in interacting with physicians.
This instrument may be useful in measuring the impact of empowerment interventions to increase older patients' personal sense of effectiveness in obtaining needed health care
|
Day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2015 Feb 6;350:h391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h391. No abstract available.
- Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
- Makoul G, Krupat E, Chang CH. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the Communication Assessment Tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):333-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
- Gramling R, Stanek S, Ladwig S, Gajary-Coots E, Cimino J, Anderson W, Norton SA; AAHPM Research Committee Writing Group; Aslakson RA, Ast K, Elk R, Garner KK, Gramling R, Grudzen C, Kamal AH, Lamba S, LeBlanc TW, Rhodes RL, Roeland E, Schulman-Green D, Unroe KT. Feeling Heard and Understood: A Patient-Reported Quality Measure for the Inpatient Palliative Care Setting. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Feb;51(2):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
- Brashers DE, Haas SM, Neidig JL. The patient self-advocacy scale: measuring patient involvement in health care decision-making interactions. Health Commun. 1999;11(2):97-121. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1102_1.
- Clayman ML, Pandit AU, Bergeron AR, Cameron KA, Ross E, Wolf MS. Ask, understand, remember: a brief measure of patient communication self-efficacy within clinical encounters. J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):72-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.500349.
- Frankel RM, Salyers MP, Bonfils KA, Oles SK, Matthias MS. Agenda setting in psychiatric consultations: an exploratory study. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Sep;36(3):195-201. doi: 10.1037/prj0000004. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
- Saunders CH, Durand MA, Kirkland KB, MacMartin MA, Barnato AE, Elwyn G. Psychometric assessment of the consideRATE questions, a new measure of serious illness experience, with an online simulation study. Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2581-2589. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
- Saunders CH, Durand MA, Scalia P, Kirkland KB, MacMartin MA, Barnato AE, Milne DW, Collison J, Bennett A, Wasp G, Nelson E, Elwyn G. "It helps us say what's important..." Developing Serious Illness Topics: A clinical visit agenda-setting tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Aug;113:107764. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107764. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
- Saunders CH, Durand MA, Scalia P, Kirkland KB, MacMartin MA, Barnato AE, Milne DW, Collison J, Jaggars A, Butt T, Wasp G, Nelson E, Elwyn G. User-Centered Design of the consideRATE Questions, a Measure of People's Experiences When They Are Seriously Ill. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Mar;61(3):555-565.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
- Sierpe A, Yen RW, Stevens G, Van Citters AD, Elwyn G, Saunders CH. Agenda-setting in the clinical encounter: A systematic review protocol. PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0312613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312613. eCollection 2024.
- Wild MG, Wallston KA, Green JA, Beach LB, Umeukeje E, Wright Nunes JA, Ikizler TA, Steed J, Cavanaugh KL. The Perceived Medical Condition Self-Management Scale can be applied to patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2017 Oct;92(4):972-978. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 May 18.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Male Urogenital Diseases
- Kidney Diseases
- Urologic Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Chronic Disease
- Disease Attributes
- Renal Insufficiency
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Behavior
- Treatment Adherence and Compliance
- Health Behavior
- Patient Acceptance of Health Care
- Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
- Patient Participation
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY02002598_2
- 1K01DK139400 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.