El Ensayo Piloto Abierto de Establecimiento de la Agenda para la Enfermedad Renal (ASK)
Estableciendo la Agenda: Un Estudio Piloto Abierto de una Intervención Estructurada para la Definición de la Agenda en Consultas Clínicas para Personas con Enfermedad Renal Crónica Avanzada que Residen en Zonas Rurales
The goal of this open pilot is to practice using an intervention and surveys before a larger pilot stepped wedge clinical trial. The intervention the researchers plan to use is Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics, and it is a structured clinical agenda-setting intervention (SAS), or a customized list of discussion topics. The people the researchers are practicing using the SAS with have advanced CKD (stages 4-5), and many of them live in rural areas. The researchers will practice administering CKD Topics, along with survey questions. By doing the open pilot, the researchers will learn if they need to modify the steps they plan to take in the larger trial.
The main questions the researchers aim to answer are:
- Do the steps for identifying eligible participants work?
- Do the steps for administering CKD Topics work?
- Do the steps to administer survey questions work?
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Estado
Condiciones
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
In this open pilot, the researchers will administer a novel structured agenda-setting tool (SAS) called Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics. The researchers will determine if their procedures for screening eligible participants, administering the intervention, and administering outcome and other questionnaires are appropriate. Learnings from the open pilot will feed forward into procedures in a larger planned pilot stepped wedge feasibility trial.
This study only has one arm, the intervention arm. The intervention, CKD Topics, will be administered as a quality improvement intervention.
Future Directions: This open pilot will inform procedural changes in an upcoming pilot stepped wedge feasibility trial.
Tipo de estudio
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Inscripción
Fase
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Keene, New Hampshire, Estados Unidos, 03431
- Cheshire Medical Center/Dartmouth-Hitchcock
-
Lebanon, New Hampshire, Estados Unidos, 03766
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults >18 years old who have been diagnosed with advanced CKD (stages 4-5).
- Care partners, clinicians and staff supporting these CKD patients who are willing and able to provide informed consent
- English-speaking
- Able to provide informed consent
- Patient must be attending outpatient visits *(in-person and/or telehealth allowable).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children under 18 years old will not be included
- Non-English-speaking patients and/or care partners
- Patients on dialysis
- Individuals unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
- Asignación: N / A
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Número de brazos
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazoGrupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / TratamientoIntervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm 1 is Clinical Visit Agenda Setting Tool Intervention
The study team will implement a structured clinical visit agenda-setting (SAS) intervention customized for advanced chronic kidney disease, called Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics. |
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Topics is a novel clinical visit agenda-setting intervention developed through participatory research methods for people with CKD living in rural areas. CKD Topics includes 8 structured discussion topic areas with the option for patients to consider and indicate their priority topic areas and take notes before, during, and after a clinical visit. |
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Feasibility Outcome: Intervention receipt
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
Our primary outcome will be feasibility, assessed by the proportion of patients who received the intervention. |
Day 1
|
Otras medidas de resultado
Otras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Process Outcome: Enrollment Rate
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
As measured by participant enrollment in Redcap. |
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Patient Self-Advocacy Scale (PSAS)
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
Patient Self-Advocacy Scale (PSAS); a 12-item validated scale assessing the latent construct of perceived self-advocacy for patients. |
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Patient self-efficacy
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
Patient self-efficacy measured using the Ask, Understand, Remember Assessment, (AURA); a validated 4-item assessment of self-efficacy completed by patients. |
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Patient self-management
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
Patient demonstration of self-management using the Perceived Medical Condition Self-Management Scale; an 8-item instrument validated to assess self-management among CKD patients; correlated with treatment adherence. |
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI) scale
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
The 10-item version, PEPPI is a valid and reliable measure of older patients' perceived self-efficacy in interacting with physicians. This instrument may be useful in measuring the impact of empowerment interventions to increase older patients' personal sense of effectiveness in obtaining needed health care |
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Serious Illness Experience
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
Serious illness experience measured by the consideRATE questions; a validated 8-item, plain language (2nd grade) patient-reported experience measure (PREM) with Likert-like response options for patients, and care partners. |
Day 1
|
|
Preliminary Efficacy Outcome: Respect Experience Assessment
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1
|
Respect experience assessment measured by the "Heard and understood" tool. Heard and Understood is a validated Single-item PREM with Likert-like response options for patients. |
Day 1
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Colaboradores
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2015 Feb 6;350:h391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h391. No abstract available.
- Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
- Makoul G, Krupat E, Chang CH. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the Communication Assessment Tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):333-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
- Gramling R, Stanek S, Ladwig S, Gajary-Coots E, Cimino J, Anderson W, Norton SA; AAHPM Research Committee Writing Group; Aslakson RA, Ast K, Elk R, Garner KK, Gramling R, Grudzen C, Kamal AH, Lamba S, LeBlanc TW, Rhodes RL, Roeland E, Schulman-Green D, Unroe KT. Feeling Heard and Understood: A Patient-Reported Quality Measure for the Inpatient Palliative Care Setting. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Feb;51(2):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
- Brashers DE, Haas SM, Neidig JL. The patient self-advocacy scale: measuring patient involvement in health care decision-making interactions. Health Commun. 1999;11(2):97-121. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1102_1.
- Clayman ML, Pandit AU, Bergeron AR, Cameron KA, Ross E, Wolf MS. Ask, understand, remember: a brief measure of patient communication self-efficacy within clinical encounters. J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):72-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.500349.
- Frankel RM, Salyers MP, Bonfils KA, Oles SK, Matthias MS. Agenda setting in psychiatric consultations: an exploratory study. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Sep;36(3):195-201. doi: 10.1037/prj0000004. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
- Saunders CH, Durand MA, Kirkland KB, MacMartin MA, Barnato AE, Elwyn G. Psychometric assessment of the consideRATE questions, a new measure of serious illness experience, with an online simulation study. Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2581-2589. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
- Saunders CH, Durand MA, Scalia P, Kirkland KB, MacMartin MA, Barnato AE, Milne DW, Collison J, Bennett A, Wasp G, Nelson E, Elwyn G. "It helps us say what's important..." Developing Serious Illness Topics: A clinical visit agenda-setting tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Aug;113:107764. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107764. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
- Saunders CH, Durand MA, Scalia P, Kirkland KB, MacMartin MA, Barnato AE, Milne DW, Collison J, Jaggars A, Butt T, Wasp G, Nelson E, Elwyn G. User-Centered Design of the consideRATE Questions, a Measure of People's Experiences When They Are Seriously Ill. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Mar;61(3):555-565.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
- Sierpe A, Yen RW, Stevens G, Van Citters AD, Elwyn G, Saunders CH. Agenda-setting in the clinical encounter: A systematic review protocol. PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0312613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312613. eCollection 2024.
- Wild MG, Wallston KA, Green JA, Beach LB, Umeukeje E, Wright Nunes JA, Ikizler TA, Steed J, Cavanaugh KL. The Perceived Medical Condition Self-Management Scale can be applied to patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2017 Oct;92(4):972-978. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 May 18.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización primaria
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Finalización del estudio
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Publicado por primera vez
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización publicada
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
- Enfermedades urogenitales
- Procesos Patológicos
- Enfermedades urogenitales masculinas
- Enfermedades Renales
- Enfermedades urológicas
- Enfermedades urogenitales femeninas
- Enfermedades urogenitales femeninas y complicaciones del embarazo
- Enfermedad crónica
- Atributos de la enfermedad
- Insuficiencia renal
- Condiciones Patológicas, Signos y Síntomas
- Comportamiento
- Adherencia y Cumplimiento del Tratamiento
- Comportamiento de salud
- Aceptación del paciente de la atención médica
- Insuficiencia Renal Crónica
- Participación del paciente
Otros números de identificación del estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- STUDY02002598_2
- 1K01DK139400 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
The study will use standard processing and documentation protocols adopted by the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) for data formats, dictionaries, variable names, descriptions, and labels. An XML schema using Data Documenting Initiative standards will also be used for codebooks and other metadata as appropriate. The researchers will share RCT process and outcomes data in CSV files via openICPSR, which is a self-publishing repository for social, behavioral and health science data and part of the ICPSR.
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .