A Multi-center Retrospective Study of INO Treating B-ALL

November 20, 2025 updated by: Jin Wang, Ruijin Hospital

A Multi-center Retrospective Study of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Treating Acute B-cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia

This multi-center retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inotuzumab ozogamicin in adults B-ALL of different subgroups. This study is a retrospective study. Data will be collected from Electronic Medical Record, interventions will not be implemented on patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200025
        • Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients received INO-based therapy in all participant center of this study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between ≥16 and ≤80 years at screening, no gender restrictions
  • Be diagnosed with B-ALL

  • Appropirate organ function, meeting the following criteria:

    1. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN);
    2. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤3 times ULN;
    3. Total bilirubin ≤2 times ULN (for patients with Gilbert's syndrome, total bilirubin ≤3.0 times ULN and direct bilirubin ≤1.5 times ULN);
    4. Serum creatinine ≤1.5 times ULN, or creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min (using the Cockcroft-Gault formula);
    5. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active infection at screening.

  • Any of the following cardiac conditions:

    1. NYHA Class III or IV congestive heart failure;
    2. Severe arrhythmia requiring treatment;
    3. Uncontrolled hypertension or pulmonary hypertension despite standard therapy;
    4. Unstable angina;
    5. Myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, or stent placement within six months before cell retransfusion;
    6. Clinically significant valvular disease;
    7. Other cardiac conditions deemed unsuitable by the investigator;
  • History of epilepsy, cerebellar disease, or other active central nervous system disorders;
  • History of hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational product.
  • Life expectancy of less than three months;
  • Other conditions deemed unsuitable for participation in this clinical trial by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
observation group
Drug: Inotuzumab Ozogamicin
All patients have received Inotuzumab Ozogamicin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall response rate
Time Frame: Till the end of the study, up to 12 months
The proportion of patients who reach CR/CRi.Bone marrow of every patient will be analysed by multiparameter flow cytometry or/and RT-qPCR for MRD evaluation.
Till the end of the study, up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
minimal residual disease negativity rate
Time Frame: Till the end of the study, up to 12 months
The proportion of patients who reach MRD negative in all patients reached CR/CRi.Bone marrow of every patient will be analysed by multiparameter flow cytometry or/and RT-qPCR for MRD evaluation.
Till the end of the study, up to 12 months
overall survival
Time Frame: Till the end of the study, up to 12 months
Interval from the date of the feedback to the time of death due to any reason. Evaluation of OS will be based on follow-up results.
Till the end of the study, up to 12 months
Relapse-free survival
Time Frame: Till the end of the study, up to 12 months
Interval from the date of reception of the INO-based therapy to the time of hematological recurrence or death from any cause. Evaluation of RFS will be based on follow-up results.
Till the end of the study, up to 12 months
Hematological toxicity: neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, bone marrow suppression Non hematological toxicity: SOS,TLS, peripheral edema, fever, fatigue, MODS, infection, liver dysfunction, renal dysfunction et al.
Time Frame: Till the end of the study, up to 12 months

Hematological toxicity includes: neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, and bone marrow suppression Non hematological toxicity includes sinus obstruction syndrome(SOS), tumor lysis syndrome(TLS), peripheral edema, fever, fatigue, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome(MODS), infection, liver dysfunction, renal dysfunction, abnormal blood electrolytes, and infusion reactions.

All AEs will be assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Till the end of the study, up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ruijin Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 18, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 20, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RJ-ALL 2025-B03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Clinical Trials on Inotuzumab Ozogamicin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings