Evaluation of the Added Value of Logotherapy in the Psychological Support of Patients With Primary Breast Cancer (AELO)

November 25, 2025 updated by: Elsan

Randomized, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Added Value of Logotherapy in the Psychological Support of Patients With Primary Breast Cancer

The diagnosis of breast cancer in a woman can cause major psychological trauma with many destructive effects in all areas of life.

Dealing with this profound distress is often difficult, sometimes poorly defined between different professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, psychotherapists, proponents of alternative therapies), leading to highly variable and difficult-to-measure results.

Since the first French cancer plan (2003/2007), facilities offering cancer care have been legally required to have a notification and support system in place. This consists of offering patients a range of supportive care throughout their cancer treatment (psychotherapy, physical activities, dietetics, pain management, etc.).

In recent years, logotherapy has been offered as part of psychological care. Logotherapy is a form of psychotherapy based on meaning, which has been offered for many years and aims to help patients create or discover meaning in their lives. Meaning serves as motivation to continue living despite illness by placing this ordeal in the context of existence.

Suffering can thus be transformed into opportunity. The use of logotherapy gives the suffering person the ability to take an active part in their treatment and helps them to mobilize their personal resources to keep the disease at bay, stabilize it, or cure it.

Several studies conducted on women with breast or gynecological cancer have shown that logotherapy can reduce the symptoms of traumatic stress and increase their ability to find meaning in their lives. However, these studies have certain limitations because they are not randomized.

In order to evaluate the short- and medium-term benefits of logotherapy in patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer, we propose a prospective, comparative, randomized study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Female patient:

  • With a first diagnosis of histologically proven breast cancer,
  • Affiliated to a health insurance scheme,
  • Having been informed and having given her free and informed consent prior to any procedure specific to the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Female patient:

  • Unable to understand the study and to answer to the questionnaires
  • With an indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Undergoing antidepressant treatment at the time of diagnosis
  • Presenting with alcohol or drug addiction at the time of diagnosis
  • Protected: adult under guardianship, curatorship, or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision.
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding, or in labor.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Support within the framework of the "announcement procedure" with logotherapy
Other: Support to the patient including logotherapy
Logotherapy consists of four individual sessions conducted by a nurse who is specialized and certified in logotherapy, at a rate of one session every two weeks, lasting approximately 60 minutes.
Active Comparator: Support within the framework of the "announcement procedure" without logotherapy
Other: Support to the patient without logotherapy
Supportive care offered as part of the patient notification process following the diagnosis of breast cancer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Anxiety score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score. The HADS is a validated self-administered questionnaire consisting of 14 items allowing patients to assess their mood over the past week. It is composed of two parts (anxiety and depression) The result ranges from 0 to 21.
10 weeks
Depression
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Depression score of the HADS. This score will be analysed on a second step (two-step hierarchical sequential analysis) only if a significative difference is observable on the first step (anxiety).
10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks, 6 months and 9 months
HADS score (anxiety and depression).
Baseline, 10 weeks, 6 months and 9 months
Perceived stress
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks, 6 months and 9 months
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score. It is a validated self-administered questionnaire, comprising 10 questions assessing a patient's individual stress level. The result is expressed in a score between 0 (no perceived stress) and 40 (high perceived stress)
Baseline, 10 weeks, 6 months and 9 months
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks, 6 months and 9 months
EORTC QJQ-C30. It is a general self-administered questionnaire comprising 30 questions to assess the quality of life of cancer patients participating in clinical trials. The result is expressed in a score between 0 and 100.
Baseline, 10 weeks, 6 months and 9 months
Consultations of psychotherapists
Time Frame: Over 9 months
Number of consultations with a specialist in psychotherapy in relation to breast cancer management.
Over 9 months
Anxyolitic treatments consumption
Time Frame: 10 weeks, 6 months and 9 months
Number of anxyolitic treatments (type, dose and indication)
10 weeks, 6 months and 9 months
Anti-depressant treatments consumption
Time Frame: 10 weeks, 6 months and 9 months
Number of anti-depressant treatments (type, dose and indication)
10 weeks, 6 months and 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Elsan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 5, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AELO
  • 2024-A02252-45 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings