Neuromodulation Strategies for Treatment-Resistant Essential Tremor Using Chronos™ DBS
Neuromodulation in Treatment Resistant Essential Tremor in Early Habituation - Investigating Low and High Frequencies / Waveform Shaping / Pulse and Bursts / Combination Therapy in Deep Brain Stimulation Utilizing the Boston Scientific® Chronos™ Software
The goal of this observational study is to learn whether a new way of programming Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) can improve and maintain tremor control in adults with essential tremor (ET) who stopped responding to standard DBS therapy.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1. Can advanced DBS settings, using varied stimulation patterns, frequencies, and pulses, restore tremor control in people with ET who lost benefit from standard Ventral Intermedius Deep Brain Stimulation (VIM-DBS)?
- 2. Do these advanced settings provide more stable, longer-lasting tremor improvement over time?
Researchers will compare six different stimulation settings to see if any of them can improve tremor symptoms when standard DBS programming no longer works.
Participants will:
- Complete a clinic visit where they try six different DBS stimulation settings using specialized Chronos software.
- Be randomly assigned to one of these settings to use at home.
- Receive a follow-up phone call at 4 weeks to check on symptoms and device use.
- Return to the clinic at 3 months for a full tremor evaluation.
- Have the option to return for an additional follow-up visit at 1 year.
This study will include 5 participants with essential tremor who previously lost benefit quickly after receiving standard VIM-DBS treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
- Purpose: To test whether new DBS programming patterns can restore and sustain tremor control in essential tremor (ET) patients who lose benefit quickly after standard Vim-DBS.
- Hypothesis: Novel stimulation paradigms - like high-frequency, microburst, cycling, and scheduling - can overcome early habituation and provide lasting tremor improvement.
- Justification: Some ET patients experience rapid loss of benefit despite correct DBS placement. Standard programming does not help them, creating a disabling condition. Advanced programming may offer a safe, non-surgical solution.
- Objectives:
- 1. Determine if Chronos™ software programs maintain tremor improvement beyond one month.
- 2. Assess safety, tolerability, and identify the most effective stimulation parameters.
- Research Design: Prospective, single-center cohort study of 5 early-habituating ET patients. Patients trial six stimulation paradigms in clinic, then are randomized to one program for home use. Follow-up occurs at 4 weeks, 3 months, and optionally 1 year.
- Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics due to small sample size. Outcomes include tremor ratings, patient-reported benefit, and recurrence of habituation.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Danielle A Pietramala
- Phone Number: 68396 604-875-4111
- Email: danielle.pietram@ubc.ca
Study Locations
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z1M9
- Vancouver General Hospital
-
Contact:
- Danielle A Pietramala
- Phone Number: 68396 604-875-4111
- Email: danielle.pietram@ubc.ca
-
Principal Investigator:
- Christopher R Honey
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults with essential tremor who have undergone standard Vim-DBS surgery
- Demonstrated rapid (early) habituation to standard programming.
- Ability to provide informed consent and attend follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to attend programming visits.
- Cognitive or language impairment precluding consent.
- Other neurological conditions confounding tremor assessment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Single Experimental Arm
All participants will test six different experimental DBS stimulation programs in the clinic using Chronos™ software.
After trying all six programs, each participant will be randomly assigned to one of the six stimulation patterns to use at home for the study period.
There is no control or placebo group; all participants receive an active DBS programming intervention.
|
DBS setting: 185 Hz, 60 µs pulse width, optimized amplitude
DBS setting: Alternates 30s at 185 Hz and 30s at 1000 Hz
DBS setting: 1000 Hz continuous, 60 µs, optimized amplitude
DBS setting: 900 Hz intraburst, 80 Hz interburst, 6 pulses per packet
DBS setting: Two or three effective programs on alternating schedules
DBS setting: 30s on / 5s off cycle without ramp, subthreshold stimulation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
The Fahn-Tolosa-Marín Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS)
Time Frame: 3-Month post programming
|
3-Month post programming
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- H25-03800
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.