Colour Match, Stability, and Patient's Satisfaction of Single-Shade Composites in Anterior Teeth
Colour Matching, Stability, and Patient's Satisfaction in Maxillary Anterior Restorations Using Single-Shade Composite and Silicone-Guided Index: A 12-Month Clinical Evaluation
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the clinical performance of a single-shade composite resin, used with an injection moulding technique, in restoring maxillary incisors affected by traumatic dental injury in patients aged 6-15 years.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How well does a single composite resin colour match the natural tooth?
- How stable is the colour over a 6- and 12-month follow-up?
- How satisfied are the children and parents with the restoration?
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Sawanya Prutthithaworn Dr, PhD
- Phone Number: +662-200-7821
- Email: sawanya.pru@mahidol.ac.th
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bangkok, Thailand
- Recruiting
- Pediatric Dental Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University
-
Contact:
- Sawanya Prutthithaworn, Dr
- Phone Number: +662-200-7821
- Email: sawanya.pru@mahidol.ac.th
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children who exhibit cooperative dental behaviours (rating 3 and 4) according to Frankl's behaviour rating scale (Frankl et al. 1962)
- Presence of at least one maxillary anterior permanent tooth with one-third of crown structure loss from dental trauma
- The affected tooth must be vital or have undergone vital pulp therapy (e.g., pulpotomy with Calcium hydroxide, white-MTA, or Biodentine)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known allergy to methacrylate-based materials
- Presence of parafunctional habits, such as bruxism
- Presence of rampant caries
- Presence of signs of hypomineralisation, such as post-eruptive breakdown, hypersensitivity, changes in enamel texture and hardness, and abnormal translucency on radiographs.
- The affected tooth is classified as having moderate or severe discolouration according to Dean's fluorosis index (Dean, 1942)
- The affected tooth has lost less than one-third of its coronal crown structure
- The affected tooth has a fracture located at the subgingival margin
- The affected tooth requires splinting due to the severity of the trauma
- Presence of severe malocclusion that could compromise the integrity of the restoration
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
|---|
|
Test
Restoring with an injectable single shade composite resin using an injectable moulding technique
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Colour matching
Time Frame: Immediate, 1-week, 6-month, 12-month after restoration
|
Colour match and translucency grading of 'very good' according to FDI criteria indicates clinically excellent colour matching and translucency.
|
Immediate, 1-week, 6-month, 12-month after restoration
|
|
Colour stability
Time Frame: 1-week, 6-month, 12-month after restoration
|
Colour match and translucency, surface and margin staining, and surface lustre grading of 'very good' according to FDI criteria indicates clinically excellent colour stability.
|
1-week, 6-month, 12-month after restoration
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1-week, 6-month, 12-month after restoration
|
Patients show the highest aesthetic satisfaction if they score 5 on a 5-point Likert scale on the aesthetic questionnaire, ranging from 5 (most satisfied) to 1 (not satisfied).
|
1-week, 6-month, 12-month after restoration
|
|
Parent satisfaction
Time Frame: 1-week, 6-month, 12-month after restoration
|
Parents show the highest aesthetic satisfaction if they score 5 on a 5-point Likert scale on the aesthetic questionnaire, ranging from 5 (most satisfied) to 1 (not satisfied).
|
1-week, 6-month, 12-month after restoration
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Pipop Saikaew, PhD, Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MU-DT/PY-IRB 2025/082.3010
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.