Pairing Subjective Patient Rating and DBS Programming (PERCEPT-DBS)

January 12, 2026 updated by: Thomas Köglsperger, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

Pairing Subjective Patient Rating and Local Field Potentials for DBS Programming

This multicenter, prospective and retrospective diagnostic study investigates personalized programming strategies for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with Parkinson's disease. DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an established therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease; however, optimization of stimulation parameters remains time-consuming and resource-intensive due to the growing complexity of electrode designs and programming options.

The PERCEPT-DBS study aims to improve DBS programming by combining subjective patient-reported outcomes with objective electrophysiological biomarkers. Specifically, the study examines the relationship between patients' subjective assessment of stimulation efficacy, measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and local field potentials (LFPs), with a focus on beta-band activity recorded from implanted DBS electrodes. These data are integrated with structural and functional neuroimaging to identify individualized stimulation "sweet spots" within the STN.

A total of 24 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease treated with bilateral STN-DBS will be recruited across several German DBS centers. Participants undergo standardized clinical assessments, VAS-based blinded monopolar reviews, and LFP recordings using sensing-enabled implantable pulse generators. In addition, imaging-based analyses are performed to relate electrophysiological and subjective measures to anatomical and connectomic features.

The primary objective is to determine whether electrophysiological markers correlate with subjective patient ratings and whether their overlap defines personalized optimal stimulation targets. By integrating patient perception with neurophysiological and imaging data, this study seeks to advance individualized DBS programming strategies and contribute to the development of more efficient, patient-centered, and potentially adaptive DBS therapies.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of adult patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease treated with bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). Participants are recruited from specialized DBS centers during postoperative follow-up or ambulatory care. All patients are capable of providing informed consent and participating in standardized clinical, electrophysiological, and patient-reported assessments. The cohort includes individuals implanted with DBS systems that allow recording of local field potentials, enabling analysis of electrophysiological biomarkers in relation to subjective patient-reported DBS efficacy and neuroimaging data.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Age between 35 and 80 years

Clinically confirmed idiopathic Parkinson's disease according to Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria

Status post bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS)

Implanted DBS system suitable for electrophysiological recordings (prospective cohort: sensing-enabled IPG)

Ability to understand study procedures and communicate reliably with the investigator

Written informed consent provided

Exclusion Criteria:

Any condition impairing the ability to provide informed consent or comply with study procedures

Presence of exclusion criteria for Parkinson's disease according to MDS criteria

Manifest dementia according to ICD-10 criteria

Severe neurological, psychiatric, or medical conditions interfering with study participation or assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Parkinson's disease patients with STN-DBS (PERCEPT-DBS cohort)
Patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease who have undergone bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Participants are implanted with sensing-enabled implantable pulse generators (e.g., Medtronic Percept™) and undergo standardized DBS programming assessments. The intervention of interest includes DBS parameter testing combined with recording of local field potentials (LFPs) and patient-reported subjective ratings using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Clinical assessments and neuroimaging data are integrated to identify personalized stimulation "sweet spots" and to evaluate the relationship between subjective symptom improvement and electrophysiological biomarkers.
Other: No intervention (observational study)
No intervention (observational study)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between beta-band local field potentials and patient-reported DBS efficacy
Time Frame: 30 to 45 days after DBS electrode implantation (first study visit)
The primary outcome is the relationship between electrophysiological activity recorded from the subthalamic nucleus and subjective patient assessment of deep brain stimulation (DBS) efficacy. Beta-band (13-30 Hz) local field potential (LFP) amplitude recorded from implanted DBS electrodes is correlated with patient-reported ratings of overall stimulation quality measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) during blinded monopolar programming. Outcome analyses assess whether electrophysiological markers correspond to higher subjective DBS benefit and whether overlapping signals define individualized stimulation "sweet spots."
30 to 45 days after DBS electrode implantation (first study visit)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Medtronic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 2, 2026

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 12, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PERCEPT-DBS STUDY

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease (PD)

Clinical Trials on No intervention (observational study)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings