Augmentation of Peri-implant Keratinized Mucosa Using a Combination of Free Gingival Graft Strip With Platelet-Rich Fibrin
Clinical Effectiveness of Combining Free Gingival Strip Graft With Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Peri-Implant Keratinized Mucosa Augmentation
This clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of combining a strip free gingival graft (sFGG) with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) for increasing keratinized mucosa around dental implants. The study compares this combined technique with the conventional free gingival graft (FGG) method through three primary objectives:
- comparing the increase in keratinized mucosal height at immediate post-op, 1, 3, and 6 months;
- assessing post-operative pain levels at 1, 3, 7, and 14 days;
- evaluating soft tissue aesthetic outcomes at 6 months post-surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Pre-operative phase:
Eligible patients undergo clinical examination and medical record documentation. Written informed consent is obtained prior to enrollment. Participants are randomly assigned by drawing one of 22 sealed envelopes: odd numbers are allocated to Group A (strip free gingival graft with PRF) and even numbers to Group B (conventional free gingival graft). Baseline intraoral and extraoral photographs and intraoral scans (PLY format) are obtained.
Intra-operative phase:
- Group A (Experimental): PRF is prepared from venous blood. A strip free gingival graft is harvested from the palate and placed at the recipient site in combination with PRF.
- Group B (Control): A conventional free gingival graft is harvested from the palate and placed at the recipient site.
Post-operative phase:
Follow-up visits are conducted at days 1, 3, 7, and 14, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery. At 1 month, healing abutments are placed and prosthetic treatment begins and impressions were taken 2 weeks later. In another 2 weeks, the final restorations were delivered. Keratinized mucosa changes are assessed using pre- and post-operative intraoral scans. Post-operative pain is evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and soft tissue aesthetic outcomes are assessed at 6 months using a standardized aesthetic score.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
VIỆT NAM
-
HỒ CHÍ MINH, VIỆT NAM, Vietnam, 123456789
- Phòng Khám Chuyên Khoa Răng Hàm Mặt Đại Học Y Dược Thành Phố Hồ Chí Minh
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients meeting the following criteria are eligible for the study:
- Prosthetic Phase: Patients scheduled for the prosthetic phase of dental implant treatment.
- Keratinized Mucosa: Keratinized mucosa height (buccal or lingual) of less than 2 mm around the implant.
- Systemic Health: Systemic health status classified as ASA I or II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification.
- Oral Hygiene: Good oral hygiene, defined by a mean full-mouth plaque index (PlI) of ≤ 1.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
- Systemic Conditions: Presence of systemic diseases or use of medications known to affect the oral mucosa or gingival health.
- Periodontal Health: Untreated periodontal disease and/or peri-implant diseases.
- Surgical History: History of mucogingival surgery at the intended surgical site.
- Pregnancy/Lactation: Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Oral Hygiene: Poor oral hygiene, defined by a mean full-mouth plaque index (PlI) > 1.
- Smoking: Current smokers.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Conventional Free Gingival Graft (FGG)
A surgical procedure where a graft consisting of epithelium and connective tissue is harvested from the palate and transplanted to the peri-implant area to increase the width and height of keratinized mucosa
|
A surgical procedure where a graft consisting of epithelium and connective tissue is harvested from the palate and transplanted to the peri-implant area to increase the width and height of keratinized
|
|
Experimental: Combining a strip free gingival graft with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) to increase keratinized mucosa
Venous blood is collected using a butterfly needle and 10ml tubes to prepare the PRF membrane.
A keratinized mucosa strip of appropriate dimensions is harvested from the patient's palate.
The strip free gingival graft and PRF membrane are then sutured and stabilized at the recipient site.
|
Venous blood is collected using a butterfly needle and 10ml tubes to prepare the PRF membrane.
A keratinized mucosa strip of appropriate dimensions is harvested from the patient's palate.
The strip free gingival graft and PRF membrane are then sutured and stabilized at the recipient site.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-operative pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 1, 3, 7 and 14 days post-operatively
|
Pain intensity is measured on a Visual Analog Scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain).
Participants will be asked to mark their level of discomfort at each time point.
|
1, 3, 7 and 14 days post-operatively
|
|
Assessment of the increase in peri-implant keratinized mucosa width and mucosa thickness
Time Frame: 1, 3, 6 months
|
KMW and MT were assessed using STL surface data at 1, 3, and 6 months
|
1, 3, 6 months
|
|
Soft tissue esthetics assessed by the modified Pink Esthetic Score (PES)
Time Frame: 6 months post-operatively
|
"The esthetic outcome of the peri-implant soft tissue is evaluated using the modified Pink Esthetic Score (PES) as described by Fürhauser et al. (2005). The assessment compares the grafted area to the adjacent natural tooth based on parameters: Soft tissue color difference, soft tissue texture difference, soft tissue contour difference. Each parameter is assigned a score of 0, 1, or 2 (0 being the lowest, 2 being the highest/most esthetic). The total PES score ranges from 0 to 6, where a higher score indicates a superior esthetic result |
6 months post-operatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 25309-DHYD
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.