The Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Desvenlafaxine in Patients With Herpes Zoster
The Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Oral Medications (Desvenlafaxine) in Patients With Herpes Zoster
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Fang Luo
- Phone Number: 13611326978
- Email: 13611326978@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Beijing, China
- Recruiting
- Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, Beijing 100070
-
Contact:
- Fang Luo
- Phone Number: 13611326978
- Email: 13611326978@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1. Ages more than 18 years;
- 2. Patients with onset of HZ rash less than 90 days;
- 3. Experiencing moderate to severe HZ pain with an average pain score of at least 4 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain);
- 4. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels less than twice the upper limit of normal;
- 5. Estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or higher;
- 6. Willing to sign the informed consent form and possessing sufficient cognitive and language abilities to comply with all the study requirements.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. History of taking desvenlafaxine;
- 2. Patients with evidence of cutaneous or visceral dissemination of HZ infection (cutaneous dissemination is defined as more than 20 discrete lesions outside adjacent dermatomes) or ocular involvement of HZ;
- 3. History of intolerance or hypersensitivity to any active components or excipient of the desvenlafaxine;
- 4. History of systemic immune diseases, organ transplantation, or cancers;
- 5. Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
- 6. Suffering from acute or chronic pain disorders other than HZ.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional therapy group
|
In the conventional therapy group, treatments will include NSAIDs, opioids, antiviral drugs and so on.
|
|
Experimental: Desvenlafaxine combined with conventional therapy group
|
In the desvenlafaxine combined conventional therapy group, venlafaxine will be initiated at 50 mg daily.
The maximum recommended dose is 400 mg daily.
In addition, the group will contain conventional treatment for HZ, except desvenlafaxine, including NSAIDs, opioids, antiviral drugs and so on.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the average numeric rating scale score over the past 24 hours, rated each morning upon awakening and average over 7 days.
Time Frame: At week 4 after experimental drug medication
|
The numeric rating scale (NRS) score is a way to quantify the degree of subjective feelings such as pain using numbers.
Generally, 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents the most severe pain.
A higher score indicates more severe pain.
|
At week 4 after experimental drug medication
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The worst numeric rating scale score
Time Frame: at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 after experimental drug medication
|
The numeric rating scale (NRS) score is a way to quantify the degree of subjective feelings such as pain using numbers.
Generally, 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents the most severe pain.
A higher score indicates more severe pain.
|
at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 after experimental drug medication
|
|
Proportion of Patients Achieving Pain Reduction
Time Frame: at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 after experimental drug medication
|
The proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% and ≥ 30% reduction in mean baseline pain intensity
|
at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 after experimental drug medication
|
|
Proportion of patients developing postherpetic neuralgia
Time Frame: at week 12 after experimental drug medication
|
at week 12 after experimental drug medication
|
|
|
The type of analgesics and average weekly consumption per analgesics
Time Frame: at weeks 4, 8, and 12 after experimental drug medication
|
at weeks 4, 8, and 12 after experimental drug medication
|
|
|
The 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) score
Time Frame: at weeks 4, 8, and 12 after experimental drug medication
|
The SF-12 score assesses the health-related quality of life, capturing preferences across various health states.
It assesses 8 dimensions: physical functioning, physical role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health.
Scores range from 0 to 100 for each dimension, with higher scores indicating better health status.
|
at weeks 4, 8, and 12 after experimental drug medication
|
|
The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS)
Time Frame: at weeks 4, 8, and 12 after experimental drug medication
|
The MOS is a questionnaire comprising 12 items that assess various aspects of sleep using a 6-point ordinal scale (1 indicating permanence and 6 indicating absence).
|
at weeks 4, 8, and 12 after experimental drug medication
|
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
|
The incidence and proportion of adverse events will be recorded and categorized as mild, moderate, severe, or life-threatening.
AEs are defined as events that arise during treatment, were absent before treatment, or worsen relative to the pretreatment state.
|
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
- Rosamilia LL. Herpes Zoster Presentation, Management, and Prevention: A Modern Case-Based Review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21(1):97-107.
- Liu Y, Xiao S, Li J, Long X, Zhang Y, Li X. A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Antiviral Agents for Immunocompetent Patients with Herpes Zoster-Associated Pain. Pain Physician. 2023;26(4):337-46.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KY2025-369-02-4
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.