IMMEDIATE IMPLANT With Different Types of Membrane
Autogenous Dentine Derived Barrier Membrane Versus Extended Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane in Immediate Implant Placement in Posterior Mandible: a 2 Year Follow up
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Al Mansurah, Egypt, 002
- Mansoura University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Eligibility Criteria:
- Patients aged 18 years and older.
- Non-restorable mandibular molars requiring extraction and GBR for immediate implant placement.
- The tooth that required extraction showed no clinical or radiographic signs of acute infection.
- There was at least 5 mm of available bone between the superior border of the inferior alveolar canal and the root apex.
- At least 8 mm inter-arch space for the prosthesis.
- Patients were free of systemic conditions that absolutely contraindicate implant insertion.
- Patients with good oral hygiene.
- Patients capable of adhering to the mandated follow-up appointments.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Tobacco Smokers.
- Pregnancy.
- Patients with a history of radiation to the head and neck.
- Bruxism and parafunctional habits
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: immediate implant with dentin-derived membrane
|
immediate implant with dentin-derived barrier membrane with allograft covering any peri-implant defect and jumping gap.
|
|
Experimental: immediate implant with extended platelet rich fibrin membrane
|
immediate implant with eprf membrane with allograft covering any peri-implant defect and jumping gap.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant stability
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The implant stability was evaluated immediately postoperatively and after 3, 6, and 12 months.
An Osstell Mentor device (Osstell, Savadaled, Sweden; Integration Diagnostics) was utilized to assess implant stability utilizing resonance frequency analysis (RFA).
Measurements were made at 90° in four different directions in order to calculate the RFA value.
The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was calculated by averaging the results for each implant.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- R.26.01.96
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.