Accelerated rTMS for Apathy in Parkinson's Disease

August 25, 2026 updated by: Daniel Lench, Medical University of South Carolina
This single-site, open-label pilot study will evaluate the feasibility, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) for apathy in individuals with Parkinson's Disease (PD). Fifteen participants with PD and clinically significant apathy will undergo six treatment visits over two weeks, receiving eight iTBS sessions per day. Outcomes include adherence, tolerability, changes in apathy (Lille Apathy Rating Scale), functional engagement, and neural target engagement assessed via resting-state fMRI and EEG. Follow-up assessments will occur at two and four weeks post-treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is designed to explore a new treatment option for people with Parkinson's disease who experience apathy, which means loss of motivation or interest in daily activities. Apathy is common in Parkinson's disease and can lower quality of life, but current treatments are limited. Investigators are testing whether a non-invasive brain stimulation technique called repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is tolerable, acceptable and can be used to improve apathy in patients with Parkinson's disease. TMS delivers brief magnetic pulses to specific areas of the brain that are linked to motivation and decision-making. In this study, Investigators will use an "accelerated" version of TMS, which gives several short sessions in a single day, reducing the number of visits required. The purpose of this research is to see whether this treatment approach is feasible, tolerable and and potentially effective at treating apathy in people with Parkinson's disease. If successful, this research study will hopefully lead to a larger study in the future where the efficacy of the treatments can be studied.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of South Carolina
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel Lench, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Emily Laramie Study Coordinator
          • Phone Number: +18437923873
          • Email: laramie@musc.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 45-85
  • Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease
  • AES ≥37
  • Stable PD medications
  • Caregiver informant available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • MRI/TMS contraindications
  • Severe cognitive impairment (MoCA <21)
  • Psychiatric disorders (bipolar, schizophrenia, active substance use disorder)
  • Seizure history
  • Acute suicidality as assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) or suicide attempt in the previous year
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: TMS group
participants with Parkinson's disease and clinically significant apathy receive accelerated iTBS rTMS targeting the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) using a MagVenture MagPro system with a cooled figure-of-eight coil and Brainsight neuronavigation (slightly off midline). Resting motor threshold (rMT) is determined on the first stimulation visit (PEST) and stimulation is delivered at 120% rMT. Treatment occurs on 6 days over ~2 weeks (days may be non-contiguous), with 8 sessions/day separated by 10-15 min. Each session delivers 600 pulses (50 Hz triplets; 2 s on/8 s off; ~190 s), totaling 4,800 pulses/day and 28,800 pulses overall. Coil position/angle and scalp-to-cortex distance are tracked; tolerability/acceptability (headache, pain, scalp irritation, facial twitching, fatigue, fear/anxiety) is assessed before/after sessions.
Device: Accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) rTMS to left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC)
Accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) rTMS to left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) (MagVenture MagPro with cooled figure-of-eight coil; Brainsight neuronavigation; 120% rMT; 6 treatment days over ~2 weeks; 8 sessions/day; 600 pulses/session; 10-15 min inter-session interval).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TMS adherence
Time Frame: Day 1 through Day 14 (6 treatment days over approximately 2 weeks)
Proportion of planned accelerated iTBS sessions completed. Adherence is calculated as number of iTBS sessions completed out of 48 scheduled sessions (6 treatment days × 8 sessions/day).
Day 1 through Day 14 (6 treatment days over approximately 2 weeks)
Target engagement (dmPFC network modulation)
Time Frame: Baseline MRI/EEG assessments (Days 0-1) and post-treatment MRI/EEG assessments (Days 14-15)
Change in dmPFC target engagement measured by (1) resting-state fMRI functional connectivity of dmPFC to motivation/effort-related nodes and (2) EEG waveform/response metrics during motivation/effort tasks, comparing pre- vs post-intervention.
Baseline MRI/EEG assessments (Days 0-1) and post-treatment MRI/EEG assessments (Days 14-15)
Frequency and Severity of TMS-Induced Side effects (TMS tolerability and acceptability)
Time Frame: Measured during each treatment day (6 days within a 2-week period)
Participant-reported tolerability/acceptability assessed with a standardized questionnaire capturing frequency and severity of common TMS side effects (e.g., headache, pain, scalp irritation, facial twitching, fatigue, fear/anxiety), collected during treatment days (pre/post sessions).
Measured during each treatment day (6 days within a 2-week period)
Apathy severity as measured by the Lille Apathy Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), immediately post-treatment (Day 14), 2 weeks post-treatment, and 4 weeks post-treatment
Change in apathy measured by the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) patient and caregiver/informant versions; analyzed as change from baseline to post-treatment and follow-up timepoints. Possible scores range from -36 to 36 with higher scores indicating greater apathy.
Baseline (Day 0), immediately post-treatment (Day 14), 2 weeks post-treatment, and 4 weeks post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Goal attainment
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), immediately post-treatment (Day 14), 2 weeks post-treatment, and 4 weeks post-treatment
Change in goal-directed behavior measured by Bangor Goal-Setting Interview outcomes, including proportion/percent attainment of individualized goals across assessment timepoints.
Baseline (Day 0), immediately post-treatment (Day 14), 2 weeks post-treatment, and 4 weeks post-treatment
Change in apathy as measured by the Dimensional Apathy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), immediately post-treatment (Day 14), 2 weeks post-treatment, and 4 weeks post-treatment"
Change in apathy-related symptoms measured using the Dimensional Apathy Scale (DAS), including patient/informant reports where applicable. Scores range from 0-24 on each of the three subscales (executive, emotional, and behavior/ cognitive initiation) with higher scores indicating greater apathy.
Baseline (Day 0), immediately post-treatment (Day 14), 2 weeks post-treatment, and 4 weeks post-treatment"
Change in apathy-related behavior as measured by the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), immediately post-treatment (Day 14), 2 weeks post-treatment, and 4 weeks post-treatment"
Change in apathy-related symptoms measured using the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FRSBE), including patient/informant reports where applicable. Apathy components include 14 questions scored 0-4 for a range of scores 0-56 with higher scores indicating greater apathy.
Baseline (Day 0), immediately post-treatment (Day 14), 2 weeks post-treatment, and 4 weeks post-treatment"

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of South Carolina

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Lench, Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 15, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 25, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00147039

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings