Lead Exposure Intervention Program (LEIP)

September 26, 2026 updated by: Sarah Benki-Nugent, University of Washington

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if BLL (blood lead level) screening and "healthy home" lead prevention program created in the US is adaptable to a Sub-Saharan African context. It will also work to address child lead exposure in Nairobi, Kenya. The main questions it aims to answer is:

  • Can materials and protocols developed for a US audience be effective in a Sub-Saharan African one?
  • Is there a difference in learning and action between groups that receive different degrees of intervention?

Researchers will compare the outcomes of a group that received lead risk reduction information only in the clinical setting to a group that also received a home visit and tailored risk reduction messages.

Participants will:

  • Have their child's blood lead levels measured at several timepoints
  • Take part in a questionnaire about lead risk
  • Receive lead risk reduction messaging either only in the clinic setting or also in their homes
  • Have their knowledge and risk reduction behaviors measured

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Kenya
      • Nairobi, Kenya
        • Dandora and Baba Ndogo Health Centres

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child age 12-72 months
  • Parent or primary caregiver that is a biological relative is available to give informed consent for LEIP study
  • Parent/caregiver is 18 years of age or older or is an emancipated minor
  • Parent available for 9 months follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

-Parent unwilling to be contacted for the purposes of tracing and follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Immediate messages

Caregivers of children with elevated blood lead levels will be provided with immediate messages about lead risk mitigation in the clinic setting. They will receive follow-up at 3 months and 9 months and will complete recall, behavior, and recheck questionnaires and their children will have BLL rechecks.
Behavioral: In-clinic lead risk reduction intervention

For children with BLL < 5 ug/dL, the result will be provided to the caregiver, together with standard post-test messaging on reducing lead exposure. A job-aid, such as a poster, showing common sources of lead exposure in children, and important sources of iron rich foods will be used to guide messaging. For BLLs ≥ 5, tailored messaging on potential sources identified on the risk factor survey will be provided.

A random sample of caregivers will complete an in-depth interview to gather barriers, understandability, and acceptability of the lead risk reduction messages received.
Experimental: Home visit

Caregivers of children with elevated blood lead levels will be provided with immediate messages about lead risk mitigation in the clinic setting. They will also receive a home observation visit and have those risk reduction methods reiterated and tailored to their home situation. They will receive follow-up at 3 months and 9 months and will complete recall, behavior, and recheck questionnaires and their children will have BLL rechecks.
Behavioral: In-clinic lead risk reduction intervention

For children with BLL < 5 ug/dL, the result will be provided to the caregiver, together with standard post-test messaging on reducing lead exposure. A job-aid, such as a poster, showing common sources of lead exposure in children, and important sources of iron rich foods will be used to guide messaging. For BLLs ≥ 5, tailored messaging on potential sources identified on the risk factor survey will be provided.

A random sample of caregivers will complete an in-depth interview to gather barriers, understandability, and acceptability of the lead risk reduction messages received.

Behavioral: Home visit with tailored messages

The home visit will be conducted within 2 weeks of initial screening. During the home visit, the lead exposure risk survey will be re-administered, for comparison to in-clinic self-report survey responses. In addition, an observational checklist of potential lead exposure risk factors will be conducted to identify and discuss residential features and items in the home environment that may be influencing their BLL. Tailored messages on lead exposure risk reduction will be provided.

A random sample of caregivers will complete an in-depth interview to gather barriers, understandability, and acceptability of the lead risk reduction messages received.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recall of survey risk factors
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post clinic visit

Lead risk surveys will be completed by participants during the clinic visit and at 3 and 9 months post home visit. Qualitative analysis of the lead risk survey will summarize themes on understandability and acceptability of survey items and messages. The rapid analysis will also explore facilitators and barriers to uptake of recommended exposure reduction measures, and individual level determinants associated with uptake (e.g., empowerment, self-efficacy).
3 and 9 months post clinic visit
Self report of risk-reduction behavior
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post clinic visit

Assess the proportion of caregivers self-reporting uptake of at least one of their risk reduction recommendations within arms and by BLL.
3 and 9 months post clinic visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in outcomes between arms
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post clinic visit

Using risk survey responses and self-reported changes in risk reduction behavior, we will compare the participants of both arms to assess for differences.
3 and 9 months post clinic visit

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uptake of the BLL re-check
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post-initial visit

Return for a re-check visit is an indicator of caregiver awareness of importance of reducing lead exposure. We will summarize the proportions of caregivers returning for each BLL re-check visit for each arm.
3 and 9 months post-initial visit
Change in BLL
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post-initial clinic visit

Change in BLL at re-checks. We do not anticipate observing a significant reduction in child BLL, given that caregivers might not have the ability to identify and/or modify a lead risk exposure.
3 and 9 months post-initial clinic visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Washington

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Benki-Nugent, University of Washington

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 26, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY00022114
  • 1R01ES036010 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All data other than patient direct or indirect identifiers will be shared.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Other researchers can contact the MPIs and complete an approved Data Sharing Agreement

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings