Lead Exposure Intervention Program (LEIP)

February 3, 2026 updated by: Sarah Benki-Nugent, University of Washington

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if BLL (blood lead level) screening and "healthy home" lead prevention program created in the US is adaptable to a Sub-Saharan African context. It will also work to address child lead exposure in Nairobi, Kenya. The main questions it aims to answer is:

  • Can materials and protocols developed for a US audience be effective in a Sub-Saharan African one?
  • Is there a difference in learning and action between groups that receive different degrees of intervention?

Researchers will compare the outcomes of a group that received lead risk reduction information only in the clinical setting to a group that also received a home visit and tailored risk reduction messages.

Participants will:

  • Have their child's blood lead levels measured at several timepoints
  • Take part in a questionnaire about lead risk
  • Receive lead risk reduction messaging either only in the clinic setting or also in their homes
  • Have their knowledge and risk reduction behaviors measured

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nairobi, Kenya
        • Pumwani Hospital and Baba Ndogo Health Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Caregivers with children ages 12-72 months attending routine care/vaccination visit at Nairobi clinical site.

Exclusion Criteria: Children outside of age range, caregivers younger than 18; plan to leave study catchment within 9 months.

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Immediate messages
Caregivers of children with elevated blood lead levels will be provided with immediate messages about lead risk mitigation in the clinic setting. They will receive follow-up at 3 months and 9 months and will complete recall, behavior, and recheck questionnaires and their children will have BLL rechecks.

For children with BLL < 5 ug/dL, the result will be provided to the caregiver, together with standard post-test messaging on reducing lead exposure. A job-aid, such as a poster, showing common sources of lead exposure in children, and important sources of iron rich foods will be used to guide messaging. For BLLs ≥ 5, tailored messaging on potential sources identified on the risk factor survey will be provided.

A random sample of caregivers will complete an in-depth interview to gather barriers, understandability, and acceptability of the lead risk reduction messages received.

Experimental: Home visit
Caregivers of children with elevated blood lead levels will be provided with immediate messages about lead risk mitigation in the clinic setting. They will also receive a home observation visit and have those risk reduction methods reiterated and tailored to their home situation. They will receive follow-up at 3 months and 9 months and will complete recall, behavior, and recheck questionnaires and their children will have BLL rechecks.

For children with BLL < 5 ug/dL, the result will be provided to the caregiver, together with standard post-test messaging on reducing lead exposure. A job-aid, such as a poster, showing common sources of lead exposure in children, and important sources of iron rich foods will be used to guide messaging. For BLLs ≥ 5, tailored messaging on potential sources identified on the risk factor survey will be provided.

A random sample of caregivers will complete an in-depth interview to gather barriers, understandability, and acceptability of the lead risk reduction messages received.

The home visit will be conducted within 2 weeks of initial screening. During the home visit, the lead exposure risk survey will be re-administered, for comparison to in-clinic self-report survey responses. In addition, an observational checklist of potential lead exposure risk factors will be conducted to identify and discuss residential features and items in the home environment that may be influencing their BLL. Tailored messages on lead exposure risk reduction will be provided.

A random sample of caregivers will complete an in-depth interview to gather barriers, understandability, and acceptability of the lead risk reduction messages received.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recall of survey risk factors
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post clinic visit
Lead risk surveys will be completed by participants during the clinic visit and at 3 and 9 months post home visit. Qualitative analysis of the lead risk survey will summarize themes on understandability and acceptability of survey items and messages. The rapid analysis will also explore facilitators and barriers to uptake of recommended exposure reduction measures, and individual level determinants associated with uptake (e.g., empowerment, self-efficacy).
3 and 9 months post clinic visit
Self report of risk-reduction behavior
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post clinic visit
Assess the proportion of caregivers self-reporting uptake of at least one of their risk reduction recommendations within arms and by BLL.
3 and 9 months post clinic visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Differences in outcomes between arms
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post clinic visit
Using risk survey responses and self-reported changes in risk reduction behavior, we will compare the participants of both arms to assess for differences.
3 and 9 months post clinic visit

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uptake of the BLL re-check
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post-initial visit
Return for a re-check visit is an indicator of caregiver awareness of importance of reducing lead exposure. We will summarize the proportions of caregivers returning for each BLL re-check visit for each arm.
3 and 9 months post-initial visit
Change in BLL
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post-initial clinic visit
Change in BLL at re-checks. We do not anticipate observing a significant reduction in child BLL, given that caregivers might not have the ability to identify and/or modify a lead risk exposure.
3 and 9 months post-initial clinic visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Benki-Nugent, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00022114
  • 1R01ES036010 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All data other than patient direct or indirect identifiers will be shared.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Other researchers can contact the MPIs and complete an approved Data Sharing Agreement

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lead Exposure

Clinical Trials on In-clinic lead risk reduction intervention

Subscribe