Comparing the Effects of Ischemic Compression and Kinesiology Taping Techniques
Comparing the Effects of Ischemic Compression and Kinesiology Taping Techniques in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Chronic low back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition associated with pain, reduced mobility, and functional limitations. Nonpharmacological interventions are frequently used to support symptom management and improve physical function. Manual therapy techniques and supportive therapeutic applications are commonly included in rehabilitation programs for individuals with chronic low back pain.
This study is designed to investigate the effects of ischemic compression and kinesiology taping techniques in individuals with chronic low back pain. Participants are assigned to different intervention groups receiving either conventional treatment alone or conventional treatment combined with additional therapeutic techniques. Interventions are delivered according to structured protocols over a defined treatment period. Outcome measures evaluate changes in pain intensity and lumbar range of motion using standardized assessment methods.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Malatya, Turkey (Türkiye), 4400
- Inonu University Turgut Ozal Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Volunteers willing to participate in the study,
- Those who have had back pain for at least 12 weeks,
- Those who have been tested with a test patch and have no allergy to kinesiology tape,
- Patients who can comply with the exercise programme to be applied were included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have undergone surgery for back pain,
- Pregnant women,
- Patients with rheumatological diseases were not included in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Treatment Group
Participants in this group receive conventional treatment consisting of standard physiotherapy modalities administered according to a structured treatment protocol over a three-week period.
No additional taping or manual compression techniques are applied in this group.
|
Conventional treatment consists of standard physiotherapy modalities administered according to a structured protocol during scheduled sessions over a three-week period.
|
|
Experimental: Conventional Treatment Plus Kinesiology Taping Group
Participants in this group receive conventional treatment consisting of standard physiotherapy modalities together with kinesiology taping applied according to a structured application protocol over a three-week treatment period.
|
Kinesiology taping is applied using standardized techniques by a trained therapist according to a structured application protocol during the treatment period.
|
|
Experimental: Conventional Treatment Plus Ischemic Compression Group
Participants in this group receive conventional treatment consisting of standard physiotherapy modalities together with ischemic compression therapy applied according to a structured protocol during scheduled sessions over a three-week period.
|
Ischemic compression therapy is a manual technique applied by a therapist using sustained pressure to targeted areas according to a structured treatment protocol during scheduled sessions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention period
|
Pain intensity is assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, a validated measure consisting of a scale ranging from no pain to worst imaginable pain.
Change is calculated as the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention scores.
|
Baseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Lumbar Flexion Range of Motion
Time Frame: Baseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention period
|
Lumbar range of motion is assessed using standardized measurement methods to evaluate spinal mobility.
Measurements are obtained before and after the intervention, and change is calculated as the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention values.
|
Baseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention period
|
|
Change in Lumbar Extension Range of Motion
Time Frame: Baseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention period
|
Lumbar range of motion is assessed using standardized measurement methods to evaluate spinal mobility.
Measurements are obtained before and after the intervention, and change is calculated as the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention values.
|
Baseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention period
|
|
Change in Lumbar Right Lateral Flexion Range of Motion
Time Frame: Baseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention period
|
Lumbar range of motion is assessed using standardized measurement methods to evaluate spinal mobility.
Measurements are obtained before and after the intervention, and change is calculated as the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention values.
|
Baseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention period
|
|
Change in Lumbar Left Lateral Flexion Range of Motion
Time Frame: Baseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention period
|
Lumbar range of motion is assessed using standardized measurement methods to evaluate spinal mobility.
Measurements are obtained before and after the intervention, and change is calculated as the difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention values.
|
Baseline and after completion of the 3-week intervention period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ilker DEMİR, PhD, Inonu University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024/136 (Other Identifier: Inonu University Clinical Research Ethics Committee)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.