Gong Mobilization With and Without Thoracic Manipulation in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
Effects of Gong Mobilization With and Without Thoracic Manipulation on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab Province
-
Kasur, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 55030
- Hassan Medical Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 40 and 60 years
- Both male and female
- Clinically diagnosed with stage 2 frozen shoulder
- Hypomobility of the thoracic spine
- Unilateral or bilateral frozen shoulder with pain lasting for more than 3 month
- Shoulder ROM limited with a flexion <165°, abduction <150°, or external rotation <45°, restricted capsular pattern .
- Positive shoulder shrug sign
Exclusion Criteria:
- Shoulder Arthritis
- Thoracic outlet syndrome
- Metabolic bone disease in the shoulder
- Neoplastic bone disease in the shoulder
- Osteoporosis and Osteomyelitis
- Arm fracture, torn ligament around the shoulder joint, and shoulder surgery
- Rheumatoid arthritis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Gong Mobilization and thoracic manipulation
|
Gong mobilization was applied on affected shoulder joint in which distraction is applied followed by corrective AP force.
Patient performs abduction and then prolong stretching of 7 seconds.
It takes 2 to 3 minutes and is applied for three sessions per week for 4 weeks.
Thoracic manipulation was applied in prone position.
Low amplitude high velocity thrust was applied at the end of available range at T4 and T5 after complete exhalation by the patient.
intervention is applied for 3 times per week for 4 weeks.
Conventional therapy includes heat therapy for 8 minutes, TENS for 20 mins.
Stretches of posterior capsule, serratus anterior, pectoralis major and minor along with Codman exercises.
|
|
Active Comparator: Gong Mobilization
|
Gong mobilization was applied on affected shoulder joint in which distraction is applied followed by corrective AP force.
Patient performs abduction and then prolong stretching of 7 seconds.
It takes 2 to 3 minutes and is applied for three sessions per week for 4 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a unidimensional, patient-reported outcome measure used to assess the intensity of pain.
Patients were asked for their pain intensity and then mark the number on the line according to their pain perception.
The categorical variables of the NPRS are, none for 0, mild for value 1-5, moderate for 6-7 and severe for 8-10.
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
|
SPADI-U
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
SPADI-U is a self-reported shoulder-specific outcome questionnaire by the evaluation of subjective clinical outcome measures.
SPADI-U is an Urdu translated version of SPADI for cultural adaptation.
It has a total of 13 items with 5 items related to pain and 8 items related to disability.
The maximum score of SPADI-U is the same to that of SPADI i.e. 13.
The scoring system includes the sum of all attempted questions divided by the maximum score and the multiply by 100 to find in percentage.
Five items are designed to quantify pain, and eight items cover the disability measures of a patient with shoulder pathology.
|
from enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Shoulder flexion ROM
Time Frame: From enrollment till end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
Changes in shoulder flexion ROM at baseline and 4 weeks was measured using Goniometer
|
From enrollment till end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
|
Shoulder Abduction ROM
Time Frame: From enrollment till end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
Changes in shoulder abduction ROM at baseline and 4 weeks was measured using Goniometer
|
From enrollment till end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
|
Shoulder internal rotation ROM
Time Frame: from enrollment till end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
Changes in shoulder Internal rotation ROM at baseline and 4 weeks was measured using Goniometer
|
from enrollment till end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
|
Shoulder external rotation
Time Frame: From enrollment till end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
Changes in shoulder external rotation ROM at baseline and 4 weeks was measured using Goniometer.
|
From enrollment till end of treatment at 4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Humera Mubashar, Ms-OMPT, Riphah International University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sah MK, Nagaraj S, Pearlson K. Gong's mobilization versus cyriax manipulation on range of motion and function recovery in subject with frozen shoulder-a comparative study. International Journal of Development Research. 2017;7:13260-8.
- Hua A. The Effects of Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation in Modulating Shoulder Pain and Dysfunction in Patients with Adhesive Capsulitis: Azusa Pacific University; 2018.
- GoPinath Y, SeenivaSan SK, Veeraraghavan SNC, Viswanathan R, Govindaraj MK. Effect of Gong's Mobilisation versus Muscle Energy Technique on Pain and Functional Ability of Shoulder in Phase II Adhesive Capsulitis. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2018;12(9).
- BILAL U, KHALID M, ANWAR K, ARSHAD H, AHMED U. Additional effects of Thoracic manipulation on pain, shoulder disability and range of motion in patients with Adhesive Capsulitis.
- Prasanth S, Sreedharan S, Subbarayalu A, Shahul P. Comparative effect of Gong's mobilization and Spencer technique to manage frozen shoulder. Physiotherapy Quarterly. 2022;31(3):57-64.
- Challey T, Dutta A, Kalita A, Pyngrope HR. Effectiveness of Gong's Mobilization Over Myofascial Release Technique in Patients with Adhesive Capsulitis..(2023). Int J Life Sci Pharma Res.13(3):L134-L44.
- El Melhat AM, Abbas RL, Zebdawi MR, Ali Ismail AM. Effect of adding thoracic manipulation for the management of patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized clinical trial. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2024:1-14.
- Babu SKR, Ramalingam V, Swetha K. Effect of Gong's Mobilization Versus Conventional Physiotherapy Among Type II Diabetic Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis. Cureus. 2024;16(6).
- Akram¹ Z, Zaheer G, Hanif A, Deen⁴ N, Rahman A, Liaquat F. EFFECT OF GONGS MOBILIZATION WITH NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION VS CONSERVATIVE EXCERCISES AMONG ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS. 2025.
- Nilkar N, Pathan UI. COMPARISON OF GONGS MOBILIZATION AND MAITLAND'S MOBILIZATION IN POST OPERATIVE SHOULDER STIFFNESS. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia. 2025;54(4):938-52.
- Summaya Maham M, Rubab N, Nayab A, Rahat F, Maria U, Arooj, et al. Effects of Gong's Mobilization vs Reverse Distraction Technique in Diabetic Patients with Adhesive Capsulitis. Journal of Health, Wellness and Community Research. 2025;3(9):e614.
- Jahangir S, Naz H, Abid F, Shahid H, Mehmood M, Tariq M, et al. Effects Of Thoracic Manipulation in Increasing Rom and Pain in Frozen Shoulder Randomized Control Study: Thoracic Manipulation in Increasing Rom and Pain in Frozen Shoulder. Pakistan BioMedical Journal. 2022;5(7):70-3.
- Amjad F, Asghar H. Comparative effects of gong's mobilization and mobilization with movement in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized clinical trial. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):4272.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- REC/RCR & AHS/24/01109
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.