The Application of Sentire Surgical System Plus Patient Side Single Arm in Robotic Colorectal Surgery

March 5, 2026 updated by: Simon S. M. Ng, Chinese University of Hong Kong

The Application of Sentire Surgical System Plus Patient Side Single Arm in Robotic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Study

Robotic assisted surgery has been performed for more than two decades with good success and safety profile. However, there was only one dominating robotic surgical system available in the past which led to high cost for robotic surgery. Recently, a new robotic surgical system (Sentire Robotic Surgical System) was introduced by researchers of The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK). This new robotic surgical system aims to achieve similar outcomes and standards of robotic surgery performed using the dominating system but with a significantly lower cost. The technologic innovation and development of this new robotic system is made by the Cornerstone Robotics Limited, which is based in Hong Kong. In a pilot clinical study conducted at Prince of Wales Hospital involving 55 patients, the Sentire Surgical System C1000 had demonstrated high success rate with minimal complications in patients who underwent robotic colorectal surgery. Recently, a new component of the system - the Patient Side Single Arm, is developed. It is an independent robotic arm designed for compatibility with the Sentire Surgical System, creating the hybrid surgical system known as the C1000 Ultra. The new component may enhance port placement flexibility, minimize arm collisions with the patient or operating table, and optimize docking for seamless integration into the operating room. The Patient Side Single Arm was proven by a preclinical study using cadaveric models to be safe and effective. The investigators would therefore like to conduct a prospective clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Sentire Surgical System Plus the Patient Side Single Arm in robotic colorectal surgery. The investigators believe that the results of this study will provide data to support its use for wide range of colorectal procedures with minimal access trauma, for the benefit of patients. This system will also lead to a wider range of clinical applications for minimally invasive surgery with a cost-effective model.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adenocarcinoma or large adenoma (not amenable to endoscopic removal) located at the colorectum (from the cecum to the anal verge) amenable to minimally invasive surgery
  • Body mass index <35 kg/m2
  • Willingness to participate as demonstrated by giving informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • T4 tumor
  • Recurrent tumor
  • Extensive previous abdominal surgery precluding minimally invasive surgery
  • Contraindication to general anesthesia
  • Severe concomitant illness that drastically shortens life expectancy or increases risk of therapeutic intervention
  • Untreated active infection
  • Noncorrectable coagulopathy
  • Presence of another malignancy or distant metastasis
  • Emergency surgery
  • Vulnerable population (e.g., mentally disabled, pregnancy)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Robotic surgery using the Sentire Surgical System Plus Patient Side Single Arm
Procedure: Robotic surgery using the Sentire Surgical System Plus Patient Side Single Arm
Robotic surgery using the Sentire Surgical System Plus Patient Side Single Arm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perioperative complications
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Perioperative complications including intraoperative complications and all complications occurring during the hospital stay or within 30 days after discharge will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III (those requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiologic intervention) or above are regarded as major complications.
Up to 1 month
Conversion rate
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
The definition of a conversion for this study is an emergent or unplanned change in the treatment plan to conventional laparoscopic or open surgery.
Up to 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Number of lymph nodes harvested
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Operative time
Time Frame: Perioperative
Perioperative
Operative blood loss
Time Frame: Perioperative
Perioperative
Pain scores on visual analog scale
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Pain scores on visual analog scale range from 0 which implies no pain at all, to 100 which implies the worst pain imaginable.
Up to 1 month
Analgesic requirement
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Total doses of paracetamol and tramadol used postoperatively.
Up to 1 month
Completeness of resection
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Completeness of total mesorectal excision (TME) is classified as complete, nearly complete, or incomplete based on gross pathologic assessment. Complete TME is defined as intact mesorectum with only minor irregularities of a smooth mesorectal surface; no defect is deeper than 5 mm; no coning toward the distal margin; and smooth circumferential resection margin (CRM) on slicing. Nearly complete TME is defined as moderate bulk to the mesorectum; irregularity of the mesorectal surface; moderate coning of the specimen; and lack of visibility of the muscularis propria visible at any site, with the exception of the insertion of the levator muscles. Incomplete TME is defined as little bulk to mesorectum with defects down onto muscularis propria and/or very irregular CRM.
Up to 1 month
Resection margin positivity for malignancy
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
A circumferential resection margin <1mm is defined as positive; a distal resection margin <1 mm is defined as positive.
Up to 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CREC 2025.712

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings